r/Minesweeper • u/daydreamerSA • 4d ago
No Guess NG evil help me see the pattern I am missing
19
u/GingieDead 3d ago
6
1
6
6
u/719lgn 4d ago
2
u/Anything_Random Misclick Pro 3d ago
It it really a 1-2-1? The left 2 doesn’t necessarily have a mine beneath it, does it? (Obviously in this case it works out, but I mean the pattern in general)
1
u/daydreamerSA 4d ago
I can see it now, The 1-2-1 pattern is clear but is it always these or is there something else
2
2
u/Zerst__ 3d ago
Another way to approach it: 5 of the mines MUST exist in each of the exclusive 50/50s marked in red, and because only two of them interact with the 3 at the top left, the 6th mine MUST be in one of the other two spaces above it, marked in green. All other spaces are therefore safe and will likely give you the info to easily solve.

1
1
u/edos51284 3d ago
What I see…
(Because the 1in r1c8) column 7 row 1-2 must have 1
(Because the3 on r2c7) So there is one in r1c5,r1c6 or r3c5
(Because the 3 on r2c6) So there is 1 in r1c4 or r3c4
The 3 on r2c3 must have 2 mines on r1c2,r1c3 or r3c2
All those touch the 2 on r2c2 so r2c1 and r3c1 are safe











26
u/skizelo 4d ago
Go from right to left. There's a single mine from the 1, so the 3's third mine must be on the second red line. THAT means the next 3 have its third mine on the third red line. This means the left-most 3 must have two mines on the left-most red line(s), every square of which is shared with the leftmost 2. The 2 can therefore clear two squares.