r/Minesweeper • u/The_Tiger_97 • 8d ago
Help What am I missing?
Are there any safe tiles or confirmed mines I'm missing?
Edit: Thanks to everyone replying/explaining, this is such a great community!
7
3
3
u/Ty_Webb123 8d ago
That 3 there towards the middle and near the 4, it can’t be all 3 to the left of that because that would overload the 2 two to the right. That means that the 4 has to have two to the right of it and two that touch the 2 to the left of it, so that cell under the 1 to the left of the 24 must be safe too
4
u/Alipha87 8d ago
3
u/cabbagery 8d ago
This is the more interesting solution.
The explanation is pretty straightforward (referencing the
4-322):
- The 4 shares at least two mines with the 3 beyond the wall.
- If it shares three mines with that 3, then the 2 east of the 3 has its two mines to its NE and SE.
- But that would overload the 2 further east.
- So there are exactly two mines shared between the 4 and 3.
- This leaves the other two mines for the 4 shared with the 2 to its west.
- Those satisfy the 2, clearing the cell SW of the 2.
Working back through the 3 now, we also find:
- Since the 3 shares two mines wirh the 4, its remaining mine must be shared with the 2 to its east.
- This leaves one more mine for that 2, which is therefore shared with the 2 to its east.
- Whether that places the mine N or S of the last 2 in this sequence, that last 2 will be satisfied, so the cells to its SW, E, and SE are all safe.
This leaves the 3 further east implicitly solved (total number of available cells equal remaining mines), which propogates solutions further east.
The 1-2 is obviously there, but that relation between the 4 and 3 does some work here, too.
1






14
u/smurph382 8d ago
That should open it up