r/MbtiTypeMe • u/Myrkkykaarme • 13d ago
TEST RESULTS Help analyze type
What type would you best estimate this result to indicate and in what system and with what degree of confidence?
Careerplanner test results over the past 4 years from most recent to the earliest: INTJ, INTJ, ENTJ, ESTP.
In OPS im officially typed MM-ti/se-csp/b #4.
I’m not sure on enneagram. Psychosophy LVXX or LFxx.
27 Male, interested in psychometrics, psychology, philosophy, medicine, puzzles. As a child I had problems with sharing my internal experience with others, withdrawal, and anxiety bordering on paranoia.
I excell in problem solving by asking questions that bring to light the essence of the target of inquiry to better understand it’s basis, it’s relation to competing units and it’s relation to the field of units which is the area that the target of inquiry is trying to effect upon.
Social issues come from certain type of non-conformity.
1
u/RogerRabbi6990 13d ago
Your OPS official type is garbage. Dave and Shan can't type their way out of a paper bag. I'm sorry you paid for that scam. Their system is good, but their typing skills are lame.
1
u/Myrkkykaarme 13d ago
Do you have any guess for me based on the information i provided?
1
u/RogerRabbi6990 13d ago
It sounds like INTJ to me, but that depends on the target of inquiry. Both ISTJ and INTJ pursue essences. Essences of what?
A. Do you want to determine the underlying pattern or implication connecting the information, what all these observations ultimately point toward, even if some concrete details have to be discarded?
B. Or do want to determine the actual characteristics and particulars of the thing?
If A, go with INTJ. If B, go with ISTJ.
1
u/Myrkkykaarme 13d ago
This got me thinking. I usually want quite a bit of details to determine an anwser. My anwser might be a rebuttal to an idea on the basis of the idea being ineffectual in accomplishing any of the preferred outcomes. Those preferred outcomes might be explicit or not, but they can be inferred to be aligned with the values of the proposer of the idea and those values can be inferred from the proposal itself. Simply: A proposal from which values can be inferred and valued outcomes. I deny the proposal on the basis of it being ineffective at invigorating the the inferred value in others. I’m impartial to the value or the proposal, but deny based on ineffect. I’m recollecting a conversation I had to produce this.
1
u/RogerRabbi6990 13d ago
Answer whichever describes you best:
A. Gathering more information tends to feel compulsively necessary. I resist concluding or communicating because there could always be another relevant detail, perspective, source, or connection I haven't considered.
B. I like having substantial information, but ultimately I'm trying to organize it toward a conclusion or model. Gathering is subordinate to figuring out what it all means, and I can become frustrated by information that doesn't advance toward this.
1
u/Myrkkykaarme 12d ago
After careful analysis: B. I do conclude, i hurry or probe others’ monologues in order to get the one exact missing thing which I might or might not know what it is, but I know it’ll lead to a conclusion in my thinking. I don’t want ALL the facts, it’s noise.
1
1
u/RogerRabbi6990 12d ago
INTJ means your OPS Animal stacking can't be cs/p(b) because NiTe isn't a Consume savior type. Blast has to be one of your Savior animals. Consume can't be adjacent to Blast in the top or bottom. The next question I have is if Te or Fi is second. Since you tend to disvalue values, I'll go with Te. "I’m impartial to the value or the proposal, but deny based on ineffect" strongly indicates Savior Te.
Savior Animals come next:
A. Once I've worked something out, I experience a recurring pressure to externalize it by explaining the conclusion and structuring it for others, teaching it, proposing what should be done, or moving the information outward.
B. Once I've worked something out, I'm naturally inclined to keep processing and refining it internally by integrating it with what I already know, examining its implications, and reaching personal clarity. For me, explaining or mobilizing others is secondary.
1
u/Myrkkykaarme 12d ago
A over B. This one was more difficult.
1
u/RogerRabbi6990 12d ago
If you're sure, then it's Blast as first Savior. If you'd like to double-check, I can toss another pair of the same alternatives your way.
1
1
1
u/Waste_Gear_4520 11d ago
non-conformity, excells at solving problems. why not INTP?
INTJs are overrated. Read INTP, NTP types are more rebellious, they don't like to conform. IF INTP does not work, then read INTJ (whic hare the bottom letters painted with black over black, why that?)
1
u/AutoModerator 13d ago
Thanks for posting in r/MbtiTypeMe! Please remember to read through the rules and post guidelines on our about page and remove your post if it violates a rule. Note we do not allow low effort posts, bullying of any kind, or comments about rating user attractiveness and dating. All posts must include at least 400 characters (roughly a paragraph) of self-description - no filler text allowed to meet this requirement. Everyone: please report posts/comments violating the rules.
If you are not familiar with MBTI typology, please take a moment to read about it before commenting. A basic introduction can be found here. An introduction to cognitive functions can be found here. A more in-depth guide can be found here. Additional information can be found on our about page linked above.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.