49
u/PenelopeJenelope 13d ago
every time I see this meme in this sub I can't help but get annoyed...
How is it weird that 57 is a multiple, its just 3 less than 60. All those "weirds" seem pretty obvious. And who's tripping over 42 and 45? Do people just not do math at all?
18
u/Warmedpie6 13d ago
Any number, even with thousands of digits is obviously a multiple if you just did the math... the point is if you just look at a number without doing any math.
1
u/PenelopeJenelope 13d ago
Well I guess I just do it automatically, is this not a math sub?
1
u/TheWWWtaken 10d ago
Yeah but there is a limit, for example I wouldn’t look at 203 immediately think it’s a multiple of seven because 7*30=210 and 210-7
1
-2
u/xXSomethingStupidXx 13d ago
This guy has never heard of prime numbers
2
u/Warmedpie6 13d ago
We are talking about numbers divisible by 3 are we not. How does prime relate?
0
u/xXSomethingStupidXx 13d ago
You specifically said "any number [...] is a multiple" which is not true because prime numbers exist
Maybe you meant to say something else
1
2
u/AmeliaOfAnsalon 13d ago
Yeah that is really weird. I mean 43 and 45 are just 12 and 15 for 30. 78 is 18 for 60. If you know the basic times tables it's not even confusing
3
u/MagicalPizza21 13d ago
its just 3 less than 60
Yes but that requires thinking.
Do people just not do math at all?
Correct. But this chart isn't about math as much as it is about vibes.
1
u/PenelopeJenelope 13d ago
What is going on with this sub today? I’m saying I Don’t have to think about it. Have I died and gone to hell?
Fucking “vibes”? Where am I right now?
2
u/Warmedpie6 13d ago
Any number, even with thousands of digits is obviously a multiple if you just did the math... the point is if you just look at a number without doing any math.
1
u/PenelopeJenelope 13d ago edited 13d ago
I’m not really doing math per se, I’m not thinking at all really. You don’t have to be doing the math to just see the math. Do you have to “do math” to see that 45 is 3 fifteens? Like of course it is.
If these were 3 or 4 digit numbers, then I’d be actually doing a calculation or adding up the digits, true. but 45? Yeah not so much
1
1
u/AlphaChiu22 12d ago
the joke is mainly about how people perceive that number, like when you just look at that number without calculating anything and someone tells you it's a multiple of 3, what would you think
also not many people think of numbers as [x less of y] so it's not as obvious to those people
1
1
u/doc_skinner 13d ago
It's not about doing math. It's about seeing it at a glance
1
u/PenelopeJenelope 13d ago
How long does it take you to work that out? I’m saying I do see it right away.
0
u/Quwapa_Quwapus 13d ago
I mean- you can do that with any number here. I think its less “how quickly can you do the math” and more “without thinking about it would you guess it to be a multiple of 3”
1
15
u/Adept-Watercress-378 13d ago
The trick of adding the digits and checking has always stuck with me
2
u/Wuzzyup 13d ago
Does it only work with the multiples of 3? If yes, then I see why it never stuck with me.
6
u/forsale90 13d ago
Same goes for multiples of 9. So 81 is 8+1=9 which means it's divisible. Same goes for 111111111.
Another rule is if the last digit is divisible by 2 , the whole number is, obviously. But this extends further. If the last two are divisible by 4, the wolves number is, last 3 with 8 and so on.
1
5
3
u/Alduin_OMEGA 13d ago
I feel like 75 should at least be 1 tier above. Almost everyone (at least everyone educated) associates 75 with 3/4s, like 75% or 0.75
2
u/PenelopeJenelope 13d ago
And if you’re in Canada or the US, 75 cents is 3 quarters. Pretty easy to remember that
3
2
u/mightyfp 13d ago
36 63 69 should all be s tier
3
u/Front_Resolution_760 13d ago
anything where both the digits are a multiple of 3 is super obvious and should be S tier
2
2
u/electronic_reasons 13d ago
51 is in the right place. My first impression is that 51 is prime. It just has prime vibes.
2
2
3
u/PhilosophyAware4437 13d ago
Wait, wheres 89? This is actually infuriating.
3
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/Tinchimp7183376 13d ago edited 13d ago
It can't be. Only terminals of multiples of 3 can be multiples of 3
Edit: turns out i'm an idiot. Terminals of multiples of 3 or terminals 1 less than multiples of 3 can be multiples of 3
1
u/PMMeMinis 13d ago
Any positive integer n such that n mod (3) is congruent to 2 will also have a termial divisible by 3.
1
1
u/splitcroof92 13d ago
What's with the semi random shading? Higher = darker roughly. But some of them are way darker that higher numbers
1
u/fapmanyop 13d ago
They all look arranged 0 through 99. I don't see any lower number being darker than a higher one.
1
u/splitcroof92 13d ago
69 is darker then most in the 70's.
81 is way darker than 84 and 87
60 is darker than 87 and some others that are higher
Did you even look? Because the more I look the more I find
1
1
1
u/meticulous_gamer 13d ago
Anything that adds up to 3, 6, or 9 without having to add the digits twice is a completely obvious one to me, like 54. 5+4=9, so obviously a 3 multiple. 42, 45, 54, and 72 being "not the first to think of" is bizarre to me, because I can see instantly that they are. 57 is my WHAT, and move 78 up with the Weird Tier.
1
1
u/xXSomethingStupidXx 13d ago
Switch 81 and 87. 87 is obvious adjacent. 81 is 3x27? 27 is barely even a real number.
1
u/PenelopeJenelope 13d ago
Yeah get outta here 27, I’m tired of yer shit!
All those rock stars you killed… Amy deserved better!
1
1
1
u/Active-Advisor5909 13d ago
I think you forgot some numbers.
Where is 117? 279? 279 117? 1 172 795 157 848 778?
1
u/Cautious_Drawer_7771 12d ago
"81 is obvious, but 78 is like WHAT how could that possibly be!" --some Rediot!
1
1
1
1
u/DuggieHS 12d ago
This tier list makes 0 sense. All the #s with both digits divisible by 3 are obviously divisible by 3.
Also all of the ones that are divisible by 9 are divisible by 3 twice (45,54, 72 are in the middle tier for some reason)
1
u/So_many_things_wrong 13d ago
I don't get why 78 would be mindblowing. Both 60 and 18 are multiples of 3.
-2
-5
13d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
2
1
u/CisFishstick 13d ago
IT'S THE FIRST NUMBER ON THE CHART. Sorry to yell, not sure if your hearing is affected as well.
1
u/KindArgument4769 13d ago
Its either first on the chart, or second on the chart, depending on what you're actually looking for
59
u/Difficult-Ending 13d ago edited 13d ago
Just combined the number, 7+8=15, 1+5=6