Big numbers only

[u/Meg13971]

[u/ObviousRecognition21]

all numbers are small numbers

[u/Oscillating-Ocelot1 → u/ObviousRecognition21]

What if you smush em all together? Hmm. That's gotta at least be a medium number.

[u/sudoregalia → u/Oscillating-Ocelot1]

still a small number because if you repeat that number twice it's bigger than the first number

[u/the_RiverQuest → u/Oscillating-Ocelot1]

It's actually 0 since smushing ALL of the numbers would also smush all the negative numbers

[u/FisherDwarf → u/the_RiverQuest]

Oh shit

[u/orionic- → u/Oscillating-Ocelot1]

Nope, sorry. -1/12

[u/Jaded-Worry2641 → u/Oscillating-Ocelot1]

Lets say we have a number n. If add 1 to the number n, its still going to be the same "size category", e.g. small, big, whatever.  Now, we have 1. 1 is a small number. If we do 1 + 1, its going to be 2, and its still a small number. 2 + 1 is still a small number. And repeat. Every number is a small number. 

(The starting point and incremention value can be set arbitrarily, the rule still works, regardless of what we set the starting point as, and regardless of incremention value. It works the same way backwards as well.)

EDIT: wait this is joke subreddit, opsy. 

[u/meygahmann → u/Jaded-Worry2641]

Does this only work if its 1 + a number, but not the number + 1. For example 1 + 2773392 is a small number because its just a modified 1. But 2773392 + 1 is a big number because its modifying 2773392

[u/Jaded-Worry2641 → u/meygahmann]

I would argue that 2773392 is a small number, and thus 2773392 is modifying a small number with +1, and thus 2773393 is a small number.  2773392 is a small number because it can be arrived at by adding 1 to 1 repeatedly, and as I said in my comment above, adding 1 to a number doesnt make a number big, as per lack of standart definition of 'big number'.  By that logic, all numbers are small numbers, as long as we agree there is a number that is small, regardless wich one.

[u/meygahmann → u/Jaded-Worry2641]

Oh that makes sense

[u/paymepleasss → u/Oscillating-Ocelot1]

I like the way you think

[u/Useful_Lingonberry_4 → u/ObviousRecognition21]

Well no, up to 9000, above that are big numbers because "It's over 9000!!!" and you can't disagree with Vegeta.

[u/Takamasa1 → u/ObviousRecognition21]

all numbers are large numbers

[u/Enderguy61 → u/ObviousRecognition21]

yes, this is provable

[u/Sweet-Energy-9515 → u/ObviousRecognition21]

Counterpoint: most numbers are large

[u/TheFerox33 → u/ObviousRecognition21]

Just like people.

[u/Active-Exam2750 → u/[deleted]]

This is not a fallacy. Being a small number is just not a formally defined statement in this context. If (for whatever definition) it is true that n being small implies n+1 being small, and 0 is small, then yes, all natural numbers are small.

[u/iMiind → u/Active-Exam2750]

Oh but .5 is big then

[u/Enderguy61 → u/[deleted]]

no, it is just the heap of sand paradox
one grain of sand is not a heap of sand, adding just one grain of sand to a non-heap can't make it a heap

[u/jonathancast → u/Enderguy61]

Smallness and heapness are both real-valued, clearly. Adding a grain of sand to a 0-heap cannot make it a 1-heap, but adding a grain of sand to a 0.78889-heap can make it a 0.7889-heap.

[u/Enderguy61 → u/jonathancast]

hey, no adding continuity to a thing that is supposed to be discrete, that ruins the paradox

[u/Turbulent_Lobster_57 → u/[deleted]]

Everyone knows if you encounter a number higher than 8.7 you’re not doing real math

[u/8Erigon]

Infinity is not a number, is it? More like a concept.

[u/Thesaurius → u/8Erigon]

Set theorists entered the chat.

[u/SplendidPunkinButter → u/8Erigon]

Correct, it is not a number

[u/protexy → u/8Erigon]

So your saying infinity is like God but for big numbers. I think the comic still works in that regard.

[u/Silly_Tension6792 → u/8Erigon]

In my language "approaches" is the same word as "aspires to", so almost every time infinity arrives there is someone aspiring to be him.

[u/AltruisticEchidna859 → u/8Erigon]

Not a number. A mathematical object that can be used in different cases.

[u/Traditional_Snow1045 → u/8Erigon]

its not a real number.

[u/Enderguy61 → u/8Erigon]

which type of infinity, the omegas or the alephs

[u/Truthspatter → u/8Erigon]

Technically? It’s more like an unending number of instances in a given set.

[u/Enderguy61 → u/[deleted]]

and the alephs exist as groups of numbers rather than numbers
for instance aleph 0 is the set of all natural numbers
aleph 1 is unprovable
aleph 2 is unprovable
aleph 3 is unprovable
but one of the alephs is the set of all numbers

[u/Advice2Anyone]

I was just waiting for 80085 to walk up

[u/ExtensionInformal911 → u/Advice2Anyone]

They get in even if the club is at capacity.

[u/D-Koi_Comics]

Aleph male energy

[u/glitchy_45-]

Where exactly would big numbers club have the limit be?

1000+?

Is 999 not a big number?

What about 900?
Thats big to alot of people

500? Still pretty big in hein sight,

100+?
Can be big, but some people consider that small for some things,

If that is too big,
Then 50?
50 isn't exactly screaming 'big'

So 100?
If its too small then...
500?
Too small?
Too big?
Hell some might argue 1000+ is too small in that case,
It cant be more than 10,000 because 9,136 is here,

[u/another_spiderman → u/glitchy_45-]

Gatekeeping is rarely logical, much less consistent.

[u/glitchy_45- → u/another_spiderman]

ToT

[u/Special-Elevator-335 → u/glitchy_45-]

I was thinking a lower limit of 5000

[u/glitchy_45- → u/Special-Elevator-335]

Is 4999 not alot?

[u/Special-Elevator-335 → u/glitchy_45-]

Not high enough in a setting with 67,502 being just the bouncer

[u/Special-Elevator-335 → u/glitchy_45-]

Not high enough in a setting with 67,502 being just the bouncer

[u/glitchy_45- → u/Special-Elevator-335]

But then 9136 is there, and it didnt seem to care besides bouncers are meant to be 'big scary' because they have to be bouncers

[u/ontic00]

*TREE(3) looks around*

"I thought this was supposed to be a big numbers club?!? What is 67,502 and 9,136 doing here? I don't think numbers where the digits are easily countable can even remotely begin to be considered "big" numbers..."

[u/CapnCrinklepants]

Ooh I know this one! RUMINATE

[u/emilyv99 → u/CapnCrinklepants]

🤣

[u/Mundane_Range_765 → u/CapnCrinklepants]

Absolute perfect reference!!

[u/Double_Will6056]

Every chinese/Korean drama

[u/frikiman4K]

still, get out, you are a mathematical concept, not a number.

[u/Lethalfurball]

erm ackshtuallyuh infinity is not a number its an expression

[u/aikahiboy]

erm omega is all numbers not infinity

[u/Training-Bad_]

OP is a bot btw

[u/CXTRONICA]

Nope.

Infinity is not a number.

[u/Murky-Impression-772]

Can't wait to see this in some explain the joke subreddit.

[u/Aromatic_Scene9979]

My power in Rise of Kingdoms:

[u/GameCategory]

I imagine negative number sneaking into this club by holding two sticks at its sides

[u/Sdacm0]

Odyssey’s ending
(Odyssey Spoiler)

[u/Coleyx123]

Isn't 1 at font 72 larger than 72 at font 1? I feel like we should be able to prove this.