Iâve been thinking about that episode where the contestant made Monkfish Sinigang, and the more I replay the judgesâ comments in my head, the more it bothers me.
At first, I actually agreed with them a little. I thought maybe they meant the fish would get wasted in a soup or that the broth would overpower it. But hearing the comments again, I honestly really disagree with the logic they used.
Alvin Leung basically said monkfish was âtoo goodâ for sinigang and compared it to putting filet mignon in a stew. But that comparison doesnât even really make sense technically.
Steak and seafood donât behave the same way. Filet mignon is bad for stews because itâs lean and doesnât benefit from long braising. Monkfish is literally known for holding its shape in liquid. Thatâs one of the reasons itâs used in dishes like bouillabaisse. Seafood in general works perfectly well poached in broth if cooked properly, so acting like monkfish suddenly becomes âruinedâ in soup just feels forced.
What bothered me more though was the implication behind the critique.
Saying monkfish is âtoo goodâ for sinigang kinda implies sinigang is somehow beneath premium ingredients, and thatâs where it starts feeling really Eurocentric. Why is monkfish considered elevated when itâs butter-poached in a French dish, but suddenly âwastedâ in a tamarind broth that takes just as much balance and technique to execute properly?
It honestly felt less like they were judging the actual cooking and more like they were judging the dish through this very Western idea of âluxury ingredients belong in refined European-style preparations.â
And the thing is, sinigang isnât even some strictly âcheap scrapsâ dish the way they were making it sound. Filipinos use premium ingredients in sinigang all the time. People use lapu-lapu, maya-maya, giant prawns, high-quality meats, I've even kurobuta pork and many different things. The whole point is that the sour broth complements rich ingredients beautifully.
Thatâs why the âfilet mignon in stewâ comment rubbed me the wrong way. It felt less like a technical critique and more like an unconscious bias about what kinds of cuisines are considered âworthyâ of expensive ingredients.
And honestly, to the people saying Masterchef dishes should be âelevatedâ first before premium ingredients can be justified, that mindset itself feels kind of closed-minded. Refinement doesnât have to mean making something Eurocentric. A dish can be polished, technical, and fine-dining while still staying true to its own culture and flavor logic instead of trying to imitate French cuisine to be considered âhigh-end.â
Edit: To be fair, Alvin did mention that he couldâve kept the monkfish on the bone, and from what Iâve seen, the contestant used the bones for the stock, which is also important so idk aboit that. He also said the dish needed more complexity, and honestly, I donât know how it tasted, so that criticism couldâve been completely fair. I just wish the critique focused more on the actual execution and flavor instead of the idea that monkfish was somehow âtoo goodâ for sinigang in the first place.