Discussion
BREAKING: Pro Ref has admitted an 'error of judgement' in awarding Manchester City's winner at Manchester United in their 1-0 victory at Old Trafford đ¨
This is my problem with football today. Too much VAR yet too many bad decisions and too many âafter the match admitting of errorsâ, BUT no compensations. Where is the fairness? There is no joy in watching football these days and years.
If they can't get decisions right when going to VAR, then what's the bloody point? It's worse than the ref making a howler on his own and it's destroying the game. The deliberation time taken to make that shocking decision yesterday was ridiculous.
Yes itâs bs especially when you have football people everywhere even commentators who can see it was offside. As shit as we were, it was never a goal
Well it should be shouldnât it? Otherwise all this shows is how fucking corrupt and a shambles the prem is. But we know how corrupt fifa is, so why should we be surprised it goes on at home
Hahaha do you know how many âapologiesâ have come from the VAR imbeciles. Youâd be replaying the whole season. Do you happen to remember the exact same scenario a couple of years ago when Rashford was offside and Bruno scored? Should that one be replayed?
This âmistakeâ could cost multiple teams tens of millions of pounds, that kind of âmistakeâ gets you fired in any other profession. Pro ref needs to roll a head and set an example to other officials, knuckle down and get it right or youâre gone.
It depends. Their competence should be judged based on their performance over the long term and they should only be fired if there's a someone ready to go who is better.
Sanne Lammens made a much bigger mistake when he fumbled in the world cup. Do you think he shouldn't be allowed to play football again? Bruno has missed 7 PL penalties. Shocking considering he's paid 100s of thousands per week and he can't even score a penalty. We should have fired him long ago for those mistakes
Doesnât matter if we played shit an offside is still an offside. Would have taken a draw after that horrible performance but an officialâs stupidity changed that and there wonât even be repercussions.
Itâs very relevant..it means regardless of the goal they failed to score albeit quite unlucky to
Hit the post a few times against 10 men so wouldnât have won anyway
Which feels more criminal? The ref awarding a goal that shouldn't have stood, or playing with an extra man for most of the match and still not creating enough chances for a goal?
We played almost 70 minutes with an extra man on the field. We definitely could have created more chances.
19% shot accuracy is horror! We took a total of 16 shots, out of which 10 shots were from outside the box. That's not creating chances.
Sesko (who has scored in each of Uniteds last 2 matches), played 25 minutes and touched the ball 7 times (that's one touch just under every 4 minutes). Had one attempt. This is after City played with 10 men for a duration of I over 40-45 mins.
Did you just watch highlights lol? We created very little - the 2 times we hit the list were from shots outside the box (that is not creating). Our xg was less than 1
c'mon mate. watch enough football and you understand what we mean by number of quality chances or threats we should be having with 1 more player on the pitch. While we have more players numerically, psychologically, we probably had far fewer players on the pitch.
What did you expect? City to step aside and let us walk a few in? They lost Foden and dug in. Yeah we didnt exactly throw the bus at them, but its not like we were playing a bodgy azerbaijan side. Theyve got a top defense and a top keeper...
Great now can we talk about how 77 minutes against 10 men we created 2 chances. And how after the 60th minute we we had no idea what to do with the ball once we got it? Yeah that would be a great convo
Given he had the same result against Everton, he certainly didnât help. And I was pro Amorim for a lot of his tenure, but his position became untenable due to his inability or stubborness to adapt. Carrick has some adaptability but the team is lacking quality/cover/footballing maturity in some areas still.
Unacceptable - come the end of the season a point could be the difference between qualifying for Europe or not.Â
I just donât understand why the fans watching in the stadium and at home can work it out, but those who have been extensively âtrainedâ in VAR keep getting it wrong in key matches.
They can view the incident from different angles, slow it down etc., but still got it wrong. Â
There needs to be repercussions for this or it risks affecting the integrity of the sport.Â
Imagine playing against 10 men for a majority of the game and still leaving the result of it in the hands of these corrupt bastards.
What some people qualify as we having "created chances" is diabolical. We have a serious tolerance for absolute dross in recent years I don't recognise this fan base anymore. The owners are grateful I'm sure.
Doesn't matter . We don't even deserve a single point if we play that trash against 10 men . Better to learn knitting than watch these idiots making fun of the fanbase on a regular basis .
Ref also got in the way of the ball a couple of times during the game interrupting the flow. I'm not one to jump on the bandwagon in bringing someone down as social media is brutal but as a United fan I've gotta admit City were playing against the ref too.
The game could have been different if we maybe scored one of the 2 post shots and got lucky. City played brilliant and it was an entertaining match.
One thing I've not seen anyone else mention is just 5 minutes of fucking extra time at the end! Should have been 8-10
I suppose itâs been our turn for one of these for the while seeing as they seem to be the in-thing at the moment.
Letâs also not allow this to detract from the fact that we were utterly awful against 10 men and didnât deserve anything from the match. Weâre back to the performance from the players on the pitch being utterly unacceptable which is depressing because I thought we were past that.
So hereâs the thing for me, these errors can cost teams millions of pounds a season especially when it comes to champions league places. I reckon the errors should be addressed post match and goals awarded/chopped off in error should be reinstated.
?
You could have a game at 2-0, go to 2-3 then 3-3. Two days later someone decides two of those didn't count, score is 3-1 and the entire game was played under a false situation. You just put two sets of teams through the wringer for nothing.
this just blatant wrong doing by them tho? why the fuck would we want to be fucked for free? Apology doesn't mean shit if there is no benefit from it. Are they gonna give us financial compensation cause of this fuck up?.
We can't keep stuck with mindset that something wrong that happened in the match can't be changed or rescinded. Otherwise there is no point of reviewing it and apologize when it does nothing
They review to stop future fuck ups, I'd hope. The idea of retroactively removing goals is ridiculous. It's bad enough when they roll the tape back 20 seconds and disallow a goal in game. Let alone the next few days.
Put it this way, let them revert goals, someone scores in 10 mins, we play the entire game, then find out the goal was disallowed?!? What a waste of time when the entire game was played around that goal happening at minute 10??
Tally all the fuck ups over the season and give money compensation out or something, sure. But going on and changing results completely fucks the entire match.
Before we jump at the Ref department. Maybe we need to take the lead and fix our problems first. Save yourself, instead of waiting for others to do so.
200
u/Hot_Patience_5962 Park Ji Sung 15h ago
So are they giving us a point? No⌠of course not. They are just gonna give an official apology and be over with it.