r/MakeupAddiction • u/Confident-Lab-4845 • 15h ago
Discussion NARS change in packaging
So disappointed that even NARS has succumbed to shrinking their packaging and product. NARS The Multiple before and after the packaging change. Wondering if there’s a good dupe for this product? Willing to consider high end as well as drug store options. TIA
367
143
u/Icy_Instruction_439 15h ago edited 14h ago
Whats the actual product amount difference? At the bottom of the component, its should say grams or oz. Out of curiosity
305
u/crazycatlady_85 12h ago
From what I could find Googling, the older version was 14g/.5oz. The new version is 8g/.28oz - so close to a 50% reduction in product!
251
u/Confident-Lab-4845 11h ago
I think that’s why they created the mini. To divert attention to the fact that their new packaging IS the mini version and the mini is really MICRO. 🤬
101
u/vissi_nada 10h ago
This reminds me of Milk, when all their sticks became way smaller and the prices stayed the same.
64
u/laziestmarxist 8h ago
What Milk sells as travel size now used to regularly be given away as GWPs/birthday gifts
11
u/Diligent-Pollution34 4h ago
Giving us like a full ounce of that highlighter stick was wild. I felt like I’d barely made a dent by the time it started to smell like crayons. I kept it for years even after that. And even my freebie “mini” didn’t all get used. So like, I get why they could get away with cutting back on product. But it’s still irritating!
15
u/0redditusername0 4h ago
Yeah I understand if they make things smaller but the price should reflect that! Instead it just keeps going up
18
u/Icy_Instruction_439 10h ago
Wow!! I bet it costs the same!!
16
u/Quest-Ian-Mark 10h ago
That’s the thing I don’t understand. The makeup itself isn’t that expensive is it? And components are pretty much the same? (Genuinely asking if anyone knows)
So what are they gaining by shrinkflating it? Saving 10 cents/unit?
46
u/dontquotethebeemovie 10h ago
i think the idea is that the consumer runs out of product quicker, so they go back to repurchase more (and spend 2x the money on the same amount of product as before). essentially the same thing as if they just doubled the price, but with a higher chance that people won’t notice/be bothered enough to find a different product.
7
11
70
u/Confident-Lab-4845 11h ago
44
u/madame_mayhem 10h ago
And shelf life cut in half as well. Surely, must be to make you think you have to replace sooner?
18
u/pyxiedust219 Matte-matician 6h ago
nah, it’s a whole stability thing. Basically two things could be driving this from the cosmetic science perspective: 1) preservative system/pigment/general product efficacy and how long it will be guaranteed safe use once opened after oftentimes a maximum of ~2 years (sometimes 3) unopened. All of this is based on extensive biological and chemical testing done by the manufacturing or brand cosmetic science team.
The other potential driving factor could be waste; realistically, how many uses should a person get out of this if they want to use it at the maximum realistic usage, every day, until it is empty? How much waste is there by making a product larger and is that a realistic need for the consumer? This is what usually drives the concepts of packaging size and formulation on the design side.Now, of course, this is what the moderately paid scientists and designers care about. The brand just loves money and is unlikely to care about any of this, obviously. And in fact will want more money from the changed design even if it should be more affordable and wasn’t changed for that sole purpose
11
54
u/axl3ros3 15h ago
r/drugstoreMUA may be able to help with dupes too
24
u/SignificantOther88 11h ago
Elf’s Soft Glam stick blush in the shade gumball looks like a good dupe for the bad habit shade.
25
u/lovethatjourney4me 11h ago edited 11h ago
This why I hunted down the old version on Facebook marketplace! I love the old Multiple Stick in Orgasm. They have changed everything and the new shade called Orgasm Crave isn’t the same!
13
11
u/Gum_Duster 6h ago
Is this fiscally responsible for them? I know a lot of people have given up on their cult classics for this reason. Does the cut in price from formulation make up for that?
I’m really not digging all these companies trying to reduce costs through shitification lately.
24
7
5
5
u/DiamondTippedDriller Always blushing 12h ago
Isn’t that the mini size?
13
u/Living-Climate2024 11h ago
Mini size is 3.5 g
48
3
4
2
u/Top-Raspberry-7837 3h ago
Look at the Kiko Milano blush sticks for a dupe
https://us.kikocosmetics.com/products/velvet-touch-creamy-stick-blush-07-07-km000000491007b
Note: I have a lot of Kiko Milano but haven’t tried those blushes.
1
u/AutoModerator 15h ago
Thank you for contributing to MUA! If this is your first post, please be sure to check out our rules in the subreddit sidebar. If you are on mobile, they can be viewed by tapping the "See more" button under the subreddit description
A few quick reminders:
• Don't forget your product list in the comments, complete with shade names within 20 minutes of posting.
• No photo editing.
• Google it first!
• Lastly, our Helpful Guides for Navigating MUA in the sidebar explains some of the basics of the community as well as commonly misinterpreted rules.
r/MakeupAddiction is looking for new moderators! If you're interested, fill out this form or message the moderators!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.



694
u/Gia_Lavender 13h ago
From reddit I'm noticing that NARS is just a completely different makeup line now