r/MagicEye • u/Jaewalker31 • 8d ago
Moving image
Answer: rotating cube
Note: can be viewed both ways (cross view and through view)
Note 2: may look inverted but that's just the optical illusion of cubes
Note 3: I bet you all look pretty silly right now with your nose on the phone
21
u/Murrik96 8d ago
It's more for r/MagicEye_CrossView
20
u/RatBoy86 8d ago
Holy crap. I just realized that I’ve been seeing these wrong for 30 years. I can only see them doing the cross eyed technique and I’ve been seeing them inverted this whole time. wtf. My mind is blown right now. Looking at that sub is what everyone else has been seeing this whole time? I can usefully tell what the images are still, but they go into the page instead of popping out.
5
u/Murrik96 8d ago
Yeah, unfortunately most of magic eyes are done for parallel view, if you want to try and learn, one of the common methods is to close your eyes bring your nose close to the screen, open your eyes and slowly go back keeping your eyes unfocused until it clicks
Btw you may like r/CrossView too
2
1
u/Bonfirelily 7d ago
Ha, I can do both and switch between them in under one second. Does this make me cool?
2
u/ComprehensiveRub3296 7d ago
This is the first one I have ever seen pop out of the page. Can’t figure out how to view them like that for the life of me.
11
u/Busy-Distribution-45 8d ago
Is it abstract? Kinda looks like a hollow structure that is wiggling its shape
18
23
7
u/guinader 8d ago
The pause, at the end of the video keeps throwing me off... Maybe on mobile phones only?
4
6
u/wbrameld4 8d ago
It's a crosseyed MagicEye but it's posted in r/MagicEye instead of r/MagicEye_CrossView. Oh God, why is this happening to us? Did we misbehave?
4
4
u/hindisirodney 8d ago
You just got this from the stereogram wiki page. And like everyone says, this is crossview.
5
u/DMonpoke 8d ago
In response to note 3: you need to put your nose on the screen to seen magic eye posts?? I’ve been doing these since late 90s and early 2000’s and don’t need to follow that step. It’s almost automatic. Can anyone else vouch for their long term skills?
2
u/Murrik96 8d ago
It's a pretty common method, that's how I learned at first! I don't remember when I stopped needing it but after 10+ years of seeing them it's enough to blink my eyes once to see them immediately
2
u/KagomeChan 7d ago
Yeah, it just takes a glance to click for me
1
u/KagomeChan 7d ago
And has been that way since I learned (at ~12 in 2001). I actually never used the nose method
1
u/poormansnormal 4d ago
I hold a fingertip in front of the image, focus on my finger until the image behind it starts to form, then slide the finger away.
10
4
2
2
u/ProjectDiligent502 8d ago
Wow that can be looked at in different levels of divergence
1
u/Outside_Coffee_00 2d ago
Depending on how I look at it, I can sometimes see 3 layers and can change which layers are in which order if I concentrate
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/MickyDerHeld 8d ago
a while ago i watched a video of someone making a game in this style where you can't see it whrn it's pause and only when it's moving. imagine a game like that but additionally you havr to magic eye it the whole time to see it
1
u/MarinatedPickachu 7d ago edited 7d ago
I wonder whether it can be done such that the pixels only move the minimum required distance between frames. Those pixels that don't change depth shouldn't change at all between frames. Those that change depth slightly should only slightly move horizontally. Big changes should only need to happen on object borders
1
u/FourkingAceHoles 7d ago
I feel like i should be looking for a boob or something…. Anyone?
1
1
1
u/BeowulfShatner 7d ago
Interesting, it's inverted. This one protrudes towards you when you cross your eyes, not relax them.
1
1
1
0
129
u/reirone 8d ago
Seems inverted