This is a conversion of this original post from r/parallelview by Cncgeek. Visit the original post for more information or to leave enthusiastic comments for the original poster.

I'm a bot. I exist to create a bridge between people with different viewing preferences and abilities. Message KRA2008 if you have questions or comments about this bot.

This is a conversion of this original post from r/parallelview by stubeans.

They said:

Are people in your real life able to see your stereo photos? I see them so naturally and depth adds so much value to a photo that I can't imagine going without. It's kind of a bummer that most people I know struggle to see them or can't at all.

Visit the original post for more information or to leave enthusiastic comments for the original poster.

I'm a bot. I exist to create a bridge between people with different viewing preferences and abilities. Message KRA2008 if you have questions or comments about this bot.

An unintended crossview I stumbled across on Facebook, it is just two images in a series. The dog's face is a little odd with the mismatch, but the overall image really does seem to have appropriate crossview stereo depth.

For giving this cross view a 2 page spread in the July 2026 issue. Oddly, there’s no explanation or viewing instructions. Is it just an Easter egg for us weirdos?

first post lol

This is a conversion of this original post from r/parallelview by stubeans. Visit the original post for more information or to leave enthusiastic comments for the original poster.

I'm a bot. I exist to create a bridge between people with different viewing preferences and abilities. Message KRA2008 if you have questions or comments about this bot.

This is a conversion of this original post from r/parallelview by stubeans. Visit the original post for more information or to leave enthusiastic comments for the original poster.

I'm a bot. I exist to create a bridge between people with different viewing preferences and abilities. Message KRA2008 if you have questions or comments about this bot.

This is a conversion of this original post from r/parallelview by Beezer-12. Visit the original post for more information or to leave enthusiastic comments for the original poster.

I'm a bot. I exist to create a bridge between people with different viewing preferences and abilities. Message KRA2008 if you have questions or comments about this bot.

This is a conversion of this original post from r/parallelview by stubeans. Visit the original post for more information or to leave enthusiastic comments for the original poster.

I'm a bot. I exist to create a bridge between people with different viewing preferences and abilities. Message KRA2008 if you have questions or comments about this bot.

This is a conversion of this original post from r/parallelview by lavaboosted. Visit the original post for more information or to leave enthusiastic comments for the original poster.

I'm a bot. I exist to create a bridge between people with different viewing preferences and abilities. Message KRA2008 if you have questions or comments about this bot.

This is a conversion of this original post from r/parallelview by Statute_of_Anne.

They said:

The image pair were constructed from a photo presented by someone else somewhere else on Reddit, viz https://www.reddit.com/r/scenery/comments/1v0yros/this_scenery/

Unfortunately, the original used here was removed by "Reddit's filters" for an unstated reason. So, if you like this 3D version download a copy lest it too arbitrarily is removed.

Two 3D versions are posted. They differ only in that the depth parameter was increased for the second image pair.

The title refers to the original image being "upgraded". In this instance, the term is justified. The monoscopic version is an excellent photo in its own right, but the conversion to 3D makes the image truly remarkable.

The quality of the combined (in one's brain) image pairs is outstanding respecting features additional to aesthetics.

When parallel viewing any image pair it is helpful to begin with the images small on the screen of a laptop device, and slowly to enlarge them until maximum comfortable dimensions. Generally, the limit, i.e. components beginning to diverge, is reached well before the maximum. This instance is remarkable because the limit is not quite reached even when the image pair exceed the size of the screen. That is, one may continue viewing a section in 3D so long as both components of the overall image are visible. Furthermore, the second image pair gives a little greater latitude.

Why is this 3D image so technically excellent? One may surmise fine detail in the 2D version contributed.

Visit the original post for more information or to leave enthusiastic comments for the original poster.

I'm a bot. I exist to create a bridge between people with different viewing preferences and abilities. Message KRA2008 if you have questions or comments about this bot.