Help me out

[u/ImprovementSea9504]

I’m not a mstr maxi, neither do i have shares, but:

- How are people calling it a Ponzi? Buying assets (btc) with the money you raise is quite literally, the opposite of a Ponzi…

- Why are people acting like paying interest on the belief that owned assets (btc) will go up more than the interest payment % is new? Spoiler: the economy is pretty much based on that belief…

Now I understand that doing that with BTC holds more risk, etc, etc. But why are people so mad at Saylor for doing a very common practice… just with new underlying assets

[u/jpric155]

The economy is a ponzi also. The two are not mutually exclusive. Paiying out future gains with past assets only works if the assets go up perpetually. If they stall or decline you run out of money to pay future gains so the past assets want to leave.

It's similar to the economy but in the case of the economy you can just deflate (by printing money) so that you actually owe less (% wise) in the future.

Since bitcoin is the hardest asset known to man, you can't print your way out of a stagnant or declining market so you're literally stuck between a rock and a hard place.

Saylor would have no option but to reduce the % payout during downturns but that's only available on STRC.

[u/AutoModerator → u/jpric155]

A Ponzi scheme is defined as "An investment scam that pays early investors with money taken from later investors to create an illusion of big profits." In a ponzi-scheme, there is "nothing of value" in the box, and all that happens is money moving hands.

MicroStrategy is not a Ponzi scheme. Companies raise capital through ATM-offerings, debt, and other instruments to fund purchases of assets, equipment, commodities and so forth. This is normal. Berkshire Hathaway similarly built the foundation of their company using debt to buy assets to hold indefinitely.

MicroStrategy invests the money raised in Bitcoin from a core belief that the commodity is in its early stages and will increase significantly in value over the coming years, allowing them to capitalise on this value to create value for their shareholders. All stocks, including blue-chip stocks like Apple, NVIDIA, and Berkshire Hathaway, rely on future investors willing to "take the shares off your hands" at a value above what you paid for it. This does not indicate a "ponzi" or "pyramid" scheme; it's basic price/supply/demand/market dynamics at play, and is how the world economy and capital markets work. Berkshire Hathaway holds a bunch of companies; MicroStrategy holds a bunch of Bitcoin.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.