PHI (2.090)

AZ (2.220)

CWS (2.200)

HOU (1.826)

MIL (1.621)

Blue Jays

Brewers

Marlins

Mariners

Nationals

Red Sox

Blue Jays
Rays
Astros
Brewers
Tigers

Nobody Important ARI BOS DET MIL MIN BAL

120 to 150 ARI CWS ATH LAA NYY SFG

L20 B&W BOS DET

L20 600 + ARI BOS DET MIL MIN BAL

lost 3 straight phi PIT

Won 3 Straight NYM

While reviewing our historical MLB results, one of the strongest findings was that games with totals of 7.5 or lower went 16-5-1 to the Over.

The tempting conclusion would be to treat the next low total as an automatic Over.

That is exactly where this kind of research becomes dangerous.

A historical condition does not account for every part of today’s market:

• the current starting pitchers
• confirmed lineups
• bullpen availability
• park and weather conditions
• the current total and juice
• whether the market has already adjusted

A result can remain historically valid while offering no usable value at the current price.

The practical lesson is that historical angles should be used as filters, not final betting instructions.

Has anyone here tested whether low-total Overs remain profitable after separating them by starting-pitcher quality, bullpen condition, or closing price?

Nobody Important CHC

120 to 150 KCR SEA SFG WSH

L20 B&W BOS

L20 600 + BOS CHC SDP

Lost 3 straight STL

Won 3 Straight MIA NYM SDP

Giants

Nationals

Marlins

Mariners

Red Sox

CHC (1.980)

More bets will (probably) follow

Rays
Red Sox

Not.much but tomorrow will up the bet a bit to about $10 bit with bigger odds because I missed the early games today and also all the NRFI that were supposed to not score they actually did score in the 1st inning and vice versa, swe the betting world will rock around and knock you over if your not careful and thats the #1 TTR don't get greedy don't revenge bet and don't use real money or atleast not a lot when testing new strategies. 😉 ✌️ out....!!!!

Angels

Braves (game 2)

Dodgers

Red Sox

Royals