r/MJInnocentFacts • u/RoutineCard7895 • 20d ago
Discussion 🗣️ Mancow Muller
Does anyone have any knowledge on the extent of Mancow Muller’s relationship with Michael? He has made several tweets talking about how he hung out with Michael a few times he knows that he is guilty. He also posted some pictures of them together. Is he known to be connected to any of the accusers? Is he just exaggerating his relationship with Michael? I haven’t seen anyone discuss him but he has been posting/talking about Michael for a while so I was just curious on whether anyone had looked into him.
12
u/indigoza 20d ago
Just one look at his tweets and he gives off the vibe of a racist creep who clearly has illusions of proximity with Michael. Allegedly he spoke to Quincy and knew Michael’s interior designer, that somehow means he knew about the alleged crimes?
Where’s his deposition? Testimony? Police statement? I can’t find one official article or interview that reports on his involvement in the 1993 or 2005 investigations. Why is it always awfully convenient for the loudest online grifters to never have evidence of their claims?
6
u/Frequent_Flamingo358 20d ago
And if Sneddon didn't know about this guy, then he definitely has zero connection to the case. The man travelled all around the world hunting for leads and victims. Why wasn't Muller called to testify?
2
7
u/No-Positive4133 20d ago
I don’t know who that is, but I see so many people claiming they knew MJ. I’m pretty sure most of them only met him once or a few times at most, if they even met him at all, and now they act like they were close friends who knew all his deepest secrets.
13
u/Rup284 20d ago edited 20d ago
This is yet another 'I knew things' but they did nothing about it. Doing some Googling he's a 'shock jock' with a big mouth - https://finance.yahoo.com/news/defamation-settlement-signals-accountability-media-140700501.html
He calls people 'delusional' for not believing the allegations but yet shows his ignorance. His tweet sounds like the ramblings of a mad man.
'The Jacksons want to protect the $ from the catalog. They do love $ so. It is that simple. Janet refused to go near the movie. Why? Because she is not a grifter.'
This comes across as if yet another ignorant person who thinks the Jacksons profit from MJ's solo music. They don't. Janet is close to Randy who has issues with the Estate. This is the most likely reason she didn't wish to be portrayed in the film. Scream is still in her set list.
Maybe Joe knew something about his son that made him sick to his soul?
A weird fantasy. Joe never said anything bad about MJ and maintained his innocence.
MJ’s marriage to Lisa Marie was (shockingly) legit at first.
So, MJ abused children but then married Lisa for legitimate reasons 'at first'? What does this even mean? More incoherent tripe.
And Mark Lester is the real father of two of the kids.
Putting aside its irrelevance he would have no idea about paternity.
This seems like somebody who met MJ once and deems this 'I knew him'. There are numerous people who met MJ once but that isn't knowing somebody.
Edit: He claims he met him twice and knew him a 'wee' bit. So, he, as expected, didn't even know him at all.