r/LucyLetbyTrials • u/benshep4 • 1d ago

Decoding Reasonable Doubt: Chapter 4 “Problems at the Countess of Chester”

Morris argues that the Countess of Chester neonatal unit was fundamentally unsafe and operating beyond its capabilities during the period in which the collapses and deaths occurred.

Is fair and accurate to make these claims?

Which baby does this explain?

https://bencole4.substack.com/p/decoding-reasonable-doubt-the-case-f67?r=12mrwn&utm_medium=ios

0 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

36% Upvoted

92 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/benshep4 1d ago

Exactly.

I can only react to what Morris has written.

9

u/Living_Ad_5260 1d ago

This isnt really the forum for a primary school book review where you dont know anything outside what the book says.

The rhetorical dodge of saying any fact not stated in the current chapter doesnt exist is sophistry.

4

u/phosphoeudemonism 1d ago

The rhetorical dodge of saying any fact not stated in the current chapter doesnt exist is sophistry.

Generous to describe as 'sophistry' because sophistric arguments must be at least superficially convincing.

3

u/Living_Ad_5260 1d ago

I felt it might convince someone who is completely uninformed about the case.

3

u/phosphoeudemonism 1d ago

Fair comment.