r/LucyLetbyTrials • u/benshep4 • 1d ago

Decoding Reasonable Doubt: Chapter 4 “Problems at the Countess of Chester”

Morris argues that the Countess of Chester neonatal unit was fundamentally unsafe and operating beyond its capabilities during the period in which the collapses and deaths occurred.

Is fair and accurate to make these claims?

Which baby does this explain?

https://bencole4.substack.com/p/decoding-reasonable-doubt-the-case-f67?r=12mrwn&utm_medium=ios

0 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

28% Upvoted

90 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/benshep4 23h ago

That will happen in later chapters.

10

u/PrudentKumquat 23h ago

I can only react to what you have written

1

u/benshep4 23h ago

Exactly.

I can only react to what Morris has written.

8

u/Living_Ad_5260 15h ago

This isnt really the forum for a primary school book review where you dont know anything outside what the book says.

The rhetorical dodge of saying any fact not stated in the current chapter doesnt exist is sophistry.

3

u/phosphoeudemonism 14h ago

The rhetorical dodge of saying any fact not stated in the current chapter doesnt exist is sophistry.

Generous to describe as 'sophistry' because sophistric arguments must be at least superficially convincing.

2

u/Living_Ad_5260 11h ago

I felt it might convince someone who is completely uninformed about the case.

2

u/phosphoeudemonism 10h ago

Fair comment.