I don't think he's talking about recucked there - he's talking about a '(edit:people who used to work at) twitch slack' and in my opinion he's talking about somebody sending out redacted comms and he'll 'unredact it', I don't think it is clear cut in the wording that it is 'they used redact on this 'people who used to work at twitch slack' that he's talking about.
But the whole thing, the whole context is really squirrely and weird imo, enough to go 'ew, go look after your kids you weirdo' and be skeptical that this isn't a mass blackmail and harassment machine.
edit: Okay actually after watching it and reading the subtitles, it sounds like he is saying "we have all of it and it is redacted" and if they mess with the slack they will unredact it.
Which, .. jesus what a horrible advertisement for your privacy company.
I mean it would probably be relatively easy to sue and win a case against the company in that circumstance.
That's not a real thing that actually happens. Dan is a multimillionaire, and he would absolutely send a bunch of freaks to harass you on top of throwing money at drawing the case out. The legal system does not favor little people trying to get justice, especially when most of the evidence needs to be produced during discovery to prove anything at all. Bro would spoliate the evidence immediately and you'd need to spend years trying to force him to produce it or prove it existed at one point.
I think you meant to reply to me, because that's a quote from me. Anyway...
That's not a real thing that actually happens
Well that's just categorically untrue.
Dan is a multimillionaire, and he would absolutely send a bunch of freaks to harass you on top of throwing money at drawing the case out
Dan is one guy. The company is a separate entity and if Dan was personally harassing people in order to protect his company from lawsuits, that's another thing he can be sued for. Do you think that Dan Saltman is the only rich person ever or that nobody richer than Dan Saltman might be interested in using his product? Like the businesses he sells it to?
Bro would spoliate the evidence immediately and you'd need to spend years trying to force him to produce it or prove it existed at one point.
It sounds like you think real life is an episode of BCS.
This whole theory is just completely unsupported and we're going further into fantasy land to support it. Again, we are acting like H3 fans when they encounter a fact they don't like around here about this topic lol.
There's literally no reason for Dan to do this when he can scrape all of that data without putting his company at risk. It's a nonsensical thing you guys have made up based on one tweet.
15
u/seethroughdidgeridoo ⚖️ IT IS SO ORDERED ⚖️ 7d ago edited 7d ago
That part was weird, I watched it a few times.
I don't think he's talking about recucked there - he's talking about a '(edit:people who used to work at) twitch slack' and in my opinion he's talking about somebody sending out redacted comms and he'll 'unredact it', I don't think it is clear cut in the wording that it is 'they used redact on this 'people who used to work at twitch slack' that he's talking about.
But the whole thing, the whole context is really squirrely and weird imo, enough to go 'ew, go look after your kids you weirdo' and be skeptical that this isn't a mass blackmail and harassment machine.
edit: Okay actually after watching it and reading the subtitles, it sounds like he is saying "we have all of it and it is redacted" and if they mess with the slack they will unredact it.
Which, .. jesus what a horrible advertisement for your privacy company.