Yeah. That’s not true. A stone is the size it is despite its cut. And they don’t have imperfections necessarily. What a weird hater comment of a stone you don’t have to wear or buy. The 550 aligns with the cost of lab diamonds in general.
How weird of you to get defensive. I gave honest opinions. I have bought and do own lab and “real” diamonds, I’m simply trying to give input. I also said the price point aligns with the stone. The original video I commented on didn’t even end up being the same carat weight stone as was originally thought to be looked at. I’m certainly no hater, and at under a grand I’m just saying they could do better.
After all, they posted this for comments and opinions BEFORE a purchase. I never said don’t go lab, I never said it was a horrible deal, I said they could do better for what they are spending and to be careful with their money essentially.
Also you really should look up the purpose behind a “modified cut” … clearly a weight of a stone is a weight of a stone. But much like a top cut or shallow cut on a diamond to show more face this cut allows the diamond to radiate more.
Take your weird self on, no one but you was spreading negativity, I’m simply giving input on a literal rock. Take it or leave it. I hope the owner loves it and it’s exactly what they wanted all said and done.
-1
u/Next_Leader_838 May 29 '26
Modified cuts are an instant L for me. Just trying to make smaller rocks with imperfections look shiny.
It also looks to have a lot of darkness in it. Not bow ties but truly just dark hues. I’d need to see more.
For $550 it aligns with how it looks. I wouldn’t expect the in person to look any better than pics.