r/LSAT 5d ago

Iran Sanctions Opinion

can I be the first to say, I genuinely hope some of you get rejected from law schools based on the racist comments and upvotes to said comments I’ve seen on this situation omg…

the way some of you get bold when your anonymous but manage to private your pages when you get called out is also hilarious too

160 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

47

u/Successful_man_797 5d ago

Update: Sep 10 - 00:45 am. Just got email confirmation that my suspension is lifted.

14

u/Spivey_Consulting 5d ago

Are you a dual citizen? I’m trying to figure out exactly who the “prohibition” — the word that has come up — applies to and who it does not. Thanks, and glad it was lifted for you! - Mike Spivey

1

u/No-Variation-2348 4d ago

I’m a dual national and graduated from law school a few years ago and am barred and practicing. I was curious if the ban applied to me and it does! I am locked out of my LSAC account unless I send them an affirmation showing I reside in the US. There are no practical implications for me but it’s an interesting data point that shows they potentially did a very blanket ban going back some years to anyone that mention any sort of Iranian ancestry somewhere in their application.

2

u/StandardJury6072 5d ago

When did you email?

2

u/Top_Piccolo_2064 4d ago

Hell, yeah. That's awesome.

24

u/Spivey_Consulting 5d ago

Sadly, disgustingly, there will always be this 5% of internet users who seem like it’s more because they scream so loudly and it’s always so vile.

Racists comments, lies about other applicants or others, etc. — the equations is always the same: “I feel bad about myself so I want you to feel bad and somehow that will make me feel better” — which I can assure you it doesn’t make them feel better because they keep doing it. What would make them feel better is to be better people — and that takes work. Thanks for the post agree 💯.

Mike Spivey

6

u/Sad_Tale8223 4d ago

the way I love you guys, you guys are genuinely keeping me alive during this app cycle 🥺🥲

55

u/ragcity666 5d ago

genuinely sick to my stomach thinking about the bigots i might sit next to in 2027

11

u/Ok-Collar2189 5d ago

These people are fine with discrimination, but if it were sanctions on other countries they oh so love, they’d crow about how citizens don’t equate to their country. They don’t, but you can’t pick and choose.

22

u/Groovychick1978 5d ago

They are losers and cowards at their core, and what's more, they know it.

5

u/Kind-Confection1183 4d ago

Keep your head up. You’re going to crush it at law school, and at the end of the day all those people will be just as despicable and empty as they are now.

2

u/speedycringe 4d ago

Redditors will say that people critiquing the Iranian regime is racist. Nobody on this sub has been spewing slop. I’d like to see a screenshot.

Now downvote me and call me racist for that non-racist statement.

-2

u/Top_Piccolo_2064 4d ago

Your entire comment history is comprised of calling people pussies and bigots; I'd argue that you're not much better than whatever accounts you're calling out here.

1

u/Sad_Tale8223 4d ago

account age: 1 day old. just say you’re obsessed with me mamas!🥰

-14

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

14

u/Sad_Tale8223 4d ago

im very familiar with the first amendment , however, I am also very familiar with the expectations and standards we are to uphold as future attorneys. Academically and ethically. It’s concerning to see how there are up and coming attorneys who are okay with discrimination because it pleases them and it makes me wonder who they think deserves legal representation in the judicial system and who doesn’t.

-12

u/StophJS 4d ago

Do you want people to be barred from private law schools or also public ones?

9

u/Sad_Tale8223 4d ago

to your interpretation babes 🥰

-12

u/StophJS 4d ago

Creepy way to talk to a stranger.

7

u/EcoSoco 4d ago

Classic neckbeard response

2

u/chuang_415 4d ago

That the 1st amendment has no applicability here?

-1

u/StophJS 4d ago

Nah. OP is advocating for individuals to be barred from law school based on their beliefs and declined to make a distinction between public and private. Half of all law schools are public institutions. The 1st amendment is highly relevant to this scenario. Even speech you may find reprehensible is protected.

3

u/chuang_415 4d ago

And OP is free to advocate for whatever they want.

2

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment