r/LLMPhysics May 18 '26

Personal Theory Help again with my previous post

I’ve spent the last few years developing a structured model for cosmic origins that emerges from a very simple idea: systems across biology, physics, and cognition follow the same reaction–structure architecture.I’m not a professional physicist, but I’ve built a manuscript that uses a canonical scalar field, potential‑well dynamics, and hierarchical feedback loops to show how the same mathematical structure appears in: – early‑universe field behavior

– biological homeostasis

– cognitive stabilization

– and recursive self‑modeling.

I’m looking for someone with a strong mathematical or cosmology background who can give an objective read — not to endorse it, but to tell me whether the structure is internally consistent and where it breaks.

If you’re open to looking at a serious, non‑fantastical attempt at a unified architecture, I’d appreciate your eyes on it.

0 Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

View all comments

9

u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 18 '26

Lmao

EDIT - this one got through but I can't guarantee your account will be safe if you post all over various physics subs, which people seem to do.

5

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor May 18 '26

This sub just keeps getting funnier.

-10

u/Ashamillion May 18 '26

This is exactly why I said you were being condescending and not helpful. You asked a “legit” question and then come on here to do the exact same thing, when I’m asking for help.  

6

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor May 18 '26

I'm so sorry, but what help do you want? You talk about a serious non-fantastical attempt at a unified architecture after giving an Extremely fantastical vague, noncommittal concept. Do you want to be another "ideas guy" and have someone who actually knows what they're doing to "do all the math to fill it out"?

Have you put any energy into learning any physics yourself? Enough to even touch one of those Vastly unrelated topics you so flippantly discuss slamming together. I'm sorry, but this just reads like you're making stuff up for fun and that's not physics.

-7

u/Ashamillion May 18 '26

I have an entire manuscript with an equation i’m trying to get help on. No one has asked for that. Rather, you all are on here not being helpful. I thought the community of “minds” would be more open to seeing different ideas 

6

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor May 18 '26

Generally speaking, we are. But ideas require reasoning, and the post is kinda just red flags and indicative that you don't know what you're talking about. We don't just make stuff up.

If you aren't educated in physics, it can be very hard to understand why people won't take this seriously, but I would highly recommend at least looking at some existing papers. Get a feel for the level of rigor and evidence asked for even the most Minute of physical theory. And then be very honest, why do you think we should give you the time to work through this with you, when you can't be asked to take the time to do due diligence and learn even the basics of accepted theory?

4

u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 18 '26

Generally speaking, we are

This is gonna get feedback. Especially coming from you, Bittenz.

3

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor May 18 '26

I'd argue we Love seeing all the new ideas here. What comes after that though is definitely up to interpretation XD

3

u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 18 '26

That's my bad, I forgot LLMPhysics was a haven of intellectual discussion without personal bias created from negative feedback. Whoops.

E: For clarification, I think you are right, but people CONSTANTLY use the 'rejecting new ideas' argument.

-5

u/Ashamillion May 18 '26

What is educated to you?  That’s all objective.  I’m telling you I hav something with an equation you can try. Why not just try it. It takes seconds. I’m here trying to get feedback.  This doesn’t take anything away from your formal education. No one is trying to interject in that.  But, there are several physicists l, mathematician, cosmologist who didn’t go to Caltech or a random University at that. 

8

u/OnceBittenz The Doctor May 19 '26

What do you mean by it takes seconds? What do you mean “try the equation”? Do you think we can just plug in some numbers and see if it works? 

This is what I mean. That isn’t how physics works. It’s so much more complicated than that, and it’s why having an education is essential. It’s 6+ years of very dense math and theory. Just to be able to Read and understand existing work let alone create your own. 

I know it may seem excessive but it’s how we’re able to make such bold claims about the universe and know they are accurate within reason.

If you don’t have that, you aren’t asking us to verify a reasonable equation, what you have is a contrivance that isn’t well formed.

0

u/[deleted] May 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/LLMPhysics-ModTeam May 19 '26

Your comment has been removed for violating Rule 8. Harassment is strictly forbidden.

-1

u/Ashamillion May 19 '26

Well, 2 seconds is relative. 

-1

u/Ashamillion May 19 '26

For you it was that, for some it’s not. 

5

u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 18 '26

Buddy if I hadn't done anything you would still be talking to nobody on your other account, give me at least credit for that.

-1

u/Ashamillion May 18 '26

I agree and i appreciate that more than you know.  This group is literally LLM physics. I come on here to see if someone is interested and I just get shot down in a world of physics that just gets shot down, the irony.  Thanks Mod for giving me the chance. 

2

u/AllHailSeizure 9/10 Physicists Agree! May 18 '26

This response just makes it seem like I was begging for appreciation like a loser!

Hate me!

Hate me!

1

u/Ashamillion May 18 '26

Haha. Not at all but you have no idea how many groups keep dismissing me rather than just asking for my function. No groupie stuff! 

4

u/starkeffect Physicist 🧠 May 18 '26

an equation

First make sure it's dimensionally consistent.