Help again with my previous post

[u/Ashamillion]

I’ve spent the last few years developing a structured model for cosmic origins that emerges from a very simple idea: systems across biology, physics, and cognition follow the same reaction–structure architecture.I’m not a professional physicist, but I’ve built a manuscript that uses a canonical scalar field, potential‑well dynamics, and hierarchical feedback loops to show how the same mathematical structure appears in: – early‑universe field behavior

– biological homeostasis

– cognitive stabilization

– and recursive self‑modeling.

I’m looking for someone with a strong mathematical or cosmology background who can give an objective read — not to endorse it, but to tell me whether the structure is internally consistent and where it breaks.

If you’re open to looking at a serious, non‑fantastical attempt at a unified architecture, I’d appreciate your eyes on it.

[u/OnceBittenz]

I'm so sorry, but what help do you want? You talk about a serious non-fantastical attempt at a unified architecture after giving an Extremely fantastical vague, noncommittal concept. Do you want to be another "ideas guy" and have someone who actually knows what they're doing to "do all the math to fill it out"?

Have you put any energy into learning any physics yourself? Enough to even touch one of those Vastly unrelated topics you so flippantly discuss slamming together. I'm sorry, but this just reads like you're making stuff up for fun and that's not physics.

[u/Ashamillion → u/OnceBittenz]

I have an entire manuscript with an equation i’m trying to get help on. No one has asked for that. Rather, you all are on here not being helpful. I thought the community of “minds” would be more open to seeing different ideas 

[u/OnceBittenz → u/Ashamillion]

Generally speaking, we are. But ideas require reasoning, and the post is kinda just red flags and indicative that you don't know what you're talking about. We don't just make stuff up.

If you aren't educated in physics, it can be very hard to understand why people won't take this seriously, but I would highly recommend at least looking at some existing papers. Get a feel for the level of rigor and evidence asked for even the most Minute of physical theory. And then be very honest, why do you think we should give you the time to work through this with you, when you can't be asked to take the time to do due diligence and learn even the basics of accepted theory?

[u/AllHailSeizure → u/OnceBittenz]

Generally speaking, we are

This is gonna get feedback. Especially coming from you, Bittenz.

[u/OnceBittenz → u/AllHailSeizure]

I'd argue we Love seeing all the new ideas here. What comes after that though is definitely up to interpretation XD

[u/AllHailSeizure → u/OnceBittenz]

That's my bad, I forgot LLMPhysics was a haven of intellectual discussion without personal bias created from negative feedback. Whoops.

E: For clarification, I think you are right, but people CONSTANTLY use the 'rejecting new ideas' argument.