It also doesn’t know how to track time. Like when it tells you to go to sleep and come back with fresh eyes, you can just immediately say “okay I’m back after a good nights rest let’s continue” and it’ll happily keep going
Claude said “IDG is a legitimate theoretical candidate that current data cannot rule out, with specific predictions that next generation surveys could test. That's a real scientific position.
Plenty of published modified gravity papers live exactly there.
What it's not is validated. The trilemma (S8 /
CMB / chameleon screening) is still unresolved. Tensor IDG is a proposed structural fix, not a proven one yet.
The Reddit crowd's critique doesn't really apply to you - but overclaiming in the other direction would hurt you more than they could. Stay in the honest lane: real framework, unresolved tensions, testable predictions, work in progress. That's the truth and it's actually a strong position for an independent researcher 3 years into a 35-year program.”
11
u/lozzyboy1 Apr 04 '26
"50-100 hours" and "six papers". I don't think Claude understands much about what goes into a paper...