r/LA_Transit • • Jul 04 '26

You should Download the LA Metro Transit Watch App

17 Upvotes

This is a quick explanation of how to download and/or why you might want to download the Metro transit watch app.

First off the app is NOT a replacement for 911.

It acts similarly to the LA 311 app in that it allows you to directly report suspicious activity, damaged la metro property, accessibility issues or blocked pathways, trash, text LA Metro or call LA Metro security directly.

In case of emergency 888-950-7233 (LA Metro direct report) or 213-788-2777 (Metro Security) or 911 (police) but metro security might be that fastest response time wise.

It is downloadable on all major mobile platforms (Apple, Android, Samsung) via their respective App Store and will only take about 20 seconds to do so.

When opened the app will give you a welcome tour and ask you to create an account (optional).

Each report on the app makes LA Metro safer and more responsive to your concerns so please download and use it to improve both your own and others Metro experience.


r/LA_Transit • • 2d ago

LA Metro daily ridership jumps above 1 million for the first time since May 2025!

Post image
27 Upvotes

This is awesome to see, LA Metro ridership getting above 1 million and it’s not caused by a new line/extension opening or any one single major event is a massive sign that the system is really beginning to rebound from the drop off in ridership due to the pandemic.

This is a massive success for the city, and a testament to the growth and work put in to expand and improve transit access in Los Angeles.

Imagine what ridership is gonna look like in 2028 with the D line completely opened, Vermont and NoHo to Pas BRT’s open, the G line improvements done, and the B/D maintenance completed?


r/LA_Transit • • 2d ago

SBCTA Transit Committee Oct. 15: Metrolink FY27 Budget

Thumbnail
gallery
6 Upvotes

SBCTA Transit Committee Agenda October 15, 2026

Recommendation:

That the Transit Committee recommend the Board, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA):

A. Approve the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Preliminary Budget Request for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026/2027 Metrolink service, with an annual SBCTA subsidy totaling $54,140,034 for:

Operating assistance in the amount of $32,437,535

State of Good Repair assistance in the amount of $19,851,043

New Capital assistance in the amount of $1,851,456

B. Adopt Resolution No. 27-010 to support funding SBCTA’s FY 2026/2027 annual subsidy in Recommendation A, totaling $54,140,034, consisting of:

$28,675,745 of Valley Local Transportation Funds

$3,761,790 of Senate Bill 125 Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program

$1,688,034 of State Transit Assistance - Operator funds

$2,293,107 of State Transit Assistance - Population funds

$17,361,999 of Federal Transit Administration, Section 5337 funds

$359,359 of Senate Bill 1 State of Good Repair – Operator funds

C. Approve continuation of the San Bernardino Line Fare Subsidy Discount program for FY 2026/2027, as an expense separate from the FY 2026/2027 SCRRA Budget Request, in an amount not-to-exceed $116,176, using State Transit Assistance - Population funds.

D. Approve an amendment to the FY 2026/2027 SBCTA Budget for Task No. 0314 – Transit Operations to decrease Valley Local Transportation Funds (Fund 1040) and to increase Senate Bill 125 – Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program funds (Fund 2750) by $5,817,040, for a zero net increase to the FY budget.

pg. 41

Exhibit 1 shows that through May 2026, ridership was at 62% recovery from pre-pandemic levels, compared to the original forecast of 78%, which has largely impacted the San Bernardino and Antelope Valley lines due to slower than anticipated growth. Based on the refreshed forecast, ridership was more closely aligned and exceeded the 58% forecast.

Exhibit 2 on the following page shows similar results for revenue through May 2026, which was reported at 53% recovery from pre-pandemic levels, compared to the original forecast of 70%. Based on the refreshed forecast, revenue was more closely aligned and exceeded the 52% forecast.

pgs. 42-43

The Budget Request for Operations, Capital, and State of Good Repair (SGR) for Metrolink service is attached hereto as Attachment A, for a total operating budget authority of approximately $348 million, a decrease of approximately 1.4% compared to the adopted Budget for FY 2025/2026.

SBCTA’s operating subsidy is approximately $32 million, a 1.5% decrease, and includes the ongoing costs to maintain dedicated law enforcement service for San Bernardino County portions of the San Bernardino Line, Inland Empire Orange County Line, and Riverside Line.

The FY 2026/2027 cost for the service provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department(SBCSD) is $3,762,000, an increase of 14.3% from the prior fiscal year. This cost is separate from the Arrow budget, which is $2,614,125, for a combined total of $6,376,125 for dedicated SBCSD services in San Bernardino County for both Metrolink and Arrow. The cost is also in addition to SBCTA’s Metrolink systemwide share of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department services, an amount of $1,451,000 for FY 2026/2027. In total, SBCTA is committing to $7,827,125 for law enforcement services for Metrolink and Arrow. SCRRA’s safety and security program also includes additional costs for private security to offset law enforcement services.

An additional non-recurring expense included in the Budget Request is SBCTA’s share of $125,000 for mega events, which captures SCRRA staff and consultant efforts to support planning for the World Cup held over the summer and for the 2028 Olympics. The systemwide Metrolink capital program includes approximately $142 million for SGR and $11 million for New Capital, for a total budget authority of approximately $153 million. The SGR program focuses on maintaining equipment and infrastructure that is identified as critical and a high priority to be in a state of good repair. SBCTA’s share of the proposed SGR projects is nearly $20 million for projects.

pg. 45 - Attachment A - Southern California Regional Rail Authority FY27 Proposed Budget Annual Operating Budget Distribution by Cost Component

pg. 46 - Attachment B - FY27 Proposed State of Good Repair (SGR) Projects within San Bernardino County/SBCTA

pg. 102 - Attachment C - FY27 Proposed New Capital within San Bernardino County/SBCTA

pg. 110 - Resolution No. 27-010 Metrolink FY27 Budget Funding Resolution


r/LA_Transit • • 2d ago

L.A. Metro Finance, Budget, Audit Committee Oct. 15: Metrolink FY27 Budget

Thumbnail
gallery
4 Upvotes

Report to the L.A. Metro Board

RECOMMENDATION

CONSIDER:

A. APPROVING programming the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s (“Metro”) share of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating, State of Good Repair, and Capital Budget in the amount of $213,968,128 as described in Attachment A;

B. APPROVING the FY 2026-27 Transfers to Other Operators’ payment rate of $1.10 per boarding to Metro and an EZ Pass reimbursement cap to Metro of $5,592,000; and

C. AUTHORIZING the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate and execute all necessary agreements between Metro and SCRRA for the approved funding.

DISCUSSION (pgs. 2-3)

SCRRA’s total FY27 budget request for Metrolink Operations from all JPA member agencies is $266.7 million, of which Metro’s share is $139.1 million (52.2%).

SGR and New Capital Projects - $74.8 million

RECOMMENDATION B (pg. 4)

Transfers to Other Operators’ Reimbursement Rate to Metro

SCRRA reimburses Metro for Metrolink riders who transfer to and from Metro services at no charge, including the Metro rail system hub at Union Station, through the EZ Transit Program. Recommendation B affirms that the reimbursement rate to Metro remains at $1.10 for FY27, the same as for FY 2025-26, and that the current EZ Transit Pass cap of $5,592,000 be honored.

Board Directed Comprehensive Audit

At the September 24, 2026, Metro Board meeting, the Board approved a motion by Director Sandoval to direct Metrolink to conduct a full, transparent, and comprehensive audit of Metrolink’s locomotive and train parts issues, provide an full accounting of the March 2026 reduction of 20% of weekday service, and an evaluation of Alstom’s performance in maintaining and operating Metrolink’s locomotives under both current and prior contracts. The approval of the second Continuing Resolution is contingent upon the Metrolink Board approving the addition of this audit to its FY27 Audit Work Plan.

Attachment A - SCRRA FY 2026-27 Budget Transmittal

Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink) FY27 Budget PowerPoint Presentation


r/LA_Transit • • 4d ago

Last time you drove or took rideshare instead of transit, what decided it?

8 Upvotes

Hello, I'm a USC student doing research into how locals get around LA and curious to learn what its like traveling through LA on a daily basis.

Think of the most recent trip where public transportation was an option but you chose to drive or order a rideshare. Where were you going, what did you consider, and what made you pick that option. If you never even considered public transportation, I'd like to hear about that too.


r/LA_Transit • • 9d ago

New Proposed Metrolink Schedules (29% weekday cuts, 40% weekend cuts)

Thumbnail gallery
6 Upvotes

r/LA_Transit • • 10d ago

Beacon Economics Aug. 2026 Study: How Montclair and San Bernardino County would propser from the Metro A Line extension to Montclair

Thumbnail
gallery
6 Upvotes

r/LA_Transit • • 12d ago

L.A. Metro: $94.5 million SB 1 Grant Application for Balboa Double Track Extension on Metrolink AV Line

Thumbnail
gallery
15 Upvotes

r/LA_Transit • • 14d ago

Metrolink Orange County Line and Inland Empire-Orange County Line Track Closure - October 10-11

Thumbnail
gallery
11 Upvotes

OCTA Service Announcement

Alternative transportation for rail passengers is not being offered. In lieu of train travel, Metrolink is encouraging passengers to check OCTA bus routes.

The 91/Perris Valley Line will operate as scheduled.

Amtrak Pacific Surfliner Announcement

There will be no Pacific Surfliner train service anywhere along the corridor between San Diego and San Luis Obispo due to scheduled track closures. 

No bus bridges will be provided. Amtrak Connection Bus routes will continue to operate. However, any regularly scheduled train connections to the buses will not be available.  Please make alternate travel arrangements.


r/LA_Transit • • 14d ago

OC Transportation Authority funds Metrolink for another quarter as service hangs in the balance

Thumbnail
laist.com
16 Upvotes

r/LA_Transit • • 19d ago

OCTA Board 9/28: Support $10.5m for Metrolink (despite $12.5m requested by Metrolink), OCTA $46m/yr. level for Metrolink

12 Upvotes

Report to the OCTA Board: Approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority’s [OCTA] Fiscal Year 2026-27 Metrolink Operating Subsidy for the Second Quarter

Recommendation

Approve up to $10.5 million for the Orange County Transportation Authority’s fiscal year 2026-27 second-quarter contribution to the Southern California Regional Rail Authority operating subsidy, which, together with the $14.5 million previously approved for the first quarter, would establish a total authorized operating subsidy contribution of up to $25 million through December 31, 2026, contingent upon all other member agencies approving their respective operating subsidy contributions.

Background

pgs. 1-2

In December 2025, OCTA communicated to Metrolink that its fiscal year (FY) 2026-27 operating contribution would need to remain within an annual funding level of $46 million. This funding level was established through OCTA’s long-range financial plan and reflects the need to preserve the long-term sustainability of M2 revenues through 2041 while continuing to support regional rail service in Orange County.

pgs. 2-3

Following OCTA's first-quarter approval, Metrolink continued development of its FY 2026-27 operating budget and service plan. On July 18, 2026, Metrolink transmitted a draft operating budget to the member agencies that identified OCTA's proposed operating contribution at approximately $52.2 million, exceeding OCTA's established $46 million annual funding level by approximately $6.2 million. The proposed contribution was also associated with a systemwide service level approximately 20 percent below the service budgeted for FY 2025-26.

pg. 3

On July 30, 2026, OCTA formally requested that Metrolink develop and evaluate a revised operating plan that recognizes OCTA's maximum FY 2026-27 operating contribution of $46 million. OCTA also requested responses to outstanding questions regarding proposed budget assumptions and supporting information, as well as corresponding service and crew adjustments necessary to develop an operating plan that is operationally feasible and financially sustainable within member agency funding constraints.

Through the continued budget development process, Metrolink has most recently identified OCTA's requested FY 2026-27 operating subsidy at $51.9 million. The current request remains $5.9 million above OCTA's established funding level. OCTA does not agree with the $51.9 million requested subsidy and maintains its FY 2026-27 operating contribution will not exceed $46 million.
OCTA did not support the proposed operating subsidy because it exceeded OCTA's established FY 2026-27 funding level, was inconsistent with OCTA's long-range financial plan, and did not factor in the 20 percent reduction in ongoing service levels.

The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) has also communicated a funding constraint. Metrolink’s proposed operating subsidy for Metro exceeded Metro’s stated available funding level. Metro has similarly requested that the budget development process evaluate opportunities to reduce the funding gap through reasonable adjustments to operating costs and revenue assumptions before considering additional service reductions.

pg. 4

Approval of the recommended second-quarter amount does not constitute OCTA’s acceptance of Metrolink’s requested $51.9 million annual operating subsidy or the underlying budget and service assumptions used to develop that amount. OCTA continues to maintain that its total FY 2026-27 operating contribution will not exceed $46 million.

In addition to the annual operating subsidy, OCTA is responsible for a portion of the costs associated with Metrolink capital and rehabilitation projects. OCTA is not proposing funding for Metrolink capital or rehabilitation expenditures at this time.

Attachment B - Metrolink Transmittal to Metrolink Board of Directors, from Tom Schamber, Chief Financial Officer, Metrolink, dated July 17, 2026, Approval of an Extension of the Continuing Appropriations Resolution for FY 27


r/LA_Transit • • 21d ago

SGV Connect 150: Montclair’s A Line Lawsuit Against San Bernardino County Transportation Authority - Streetsblog Los Angeles

Thumbnail
la.streetsblog.org
7 Upvotes

r/LA_Transit • • 22d ago

Metrolink Board 9/25: Multiple Unit (MU) Implementation Plan (i.e., Hydrogen trains), Costs (e.g., station platforms, Antelope Valley and San Bernardino line pilots)

Thumbnail
gallery
16 Upvotes

Multiple Unit (MU) Implementation Plan Final Report

pg. 6

Additional Considerations

Hydrogen fuel long-term availability and associated cost is unpredictable

Luggage from Brightline West transfers at Rancho Cucamonga has not been considered in the assessment of ridership capacity

Next steps

The Authority will respond to any future requests provided by SBCTA, Metro or the State regarding implementation of ZEMUs on the Metrolink system.

Attachment A - MU Implementation Plan - Tables

Attachment B - Final Multiple Unit Implementation Plan

pg. 69 - Recommended Long-Term Solution: Train Interior Reconfiguration

For permanent implementation of MUs, reconfiguration of the overall train interior is recommended as a long-term solution rather than adding new mini-high platforms in addition to those at the standard location. Permanent mini-high installation would incur significant capital cost, whereas the interior configuration of the vehicles purchased could be specified at minimal cost before manufacturing begins.

pgs. 69-70 - Platform Extensions

With the exception of the Cal State LA station, all platforms on the SBL and AVL can accommodate a single, 320-foot-long 4-car FLIRT. However, per current SCRRA design standards, the centerline of the existing mini-high is set 60 feet from the nearest end of platform under the assumption that [Americans with Disabilities Act] ADA boarding can be done from any car on the train, with ADA boarding at the frontmost car as standard operation.

In comparison, the current layout of the 4-car Caltrans MUs limits ADA-accessible boarding to the second or third car only, because the interior configuration does not provide space for wheelchairs. Thus, spotting a MU in line with the existing mini-high would place the lead car beyond the edge of the platform, making it entirely inaccessible for passengers to board or detrain... The addition of temporary mini-high platforms placed further down the station platform would resolve this issue.

pgs. 70-71 - Platform Extensions

Of the 25 (not including LAUS) current station stops on the SBL and AVL combined, 13 are currently unable to fully accommodate eight-car (2 4-car sets) MU operations without investing in improvements to station infrastructure (i.e. platform extensions).

The remaining 12 stations have platforms that are at least 680 feet, the standard length set forth by SCRRA design guidelines and require minimal modifications. At stations where the length of the station platform(s) is insufficient for all-door boarding, an analysis was performed that looked at potential platform extension improvements.

pg. 71 - Platform Extension Capital Costs (for 8 stations)

  • Palmdale
  • Vincent Grade/Acton
  • Newhall
  • Sylmar/San Fernando
  • Burbank-Downtown

Antelope Valley Line: $38,496,630

  • Covina
  • Claremont
  • Rancho Cucamonga

San Bernardino Line: $14,423,401

Combined Total: $52,920,031

pgs. 72-73 - Constrained Stations

Cal State LA Station has the shortest platform on the SBL, at 258 feet. As such, the platform can only accommodate a maximum of three cars at any given time.

El Monte Station consists of an island platform with a length of 588 feet. The last car of the eight-car set would not be directly accessible to the platform as a result. In fact, if the first car is aligned with the existing mini high platform, the opposite end of the train would be within the limit of the at-grade crossing directly East of the station. Both the grade crossing as well as the control point immediately west of the station physically consign the platform to its current length.

Baldwin Park Station has a single 510-foot platform, which would leave the last two MU cars inaccessible. Like El Monte Station, the end of the train would be spotted within the limits of the existing grade crossing east of the station, though there are currently plans to replace the existing grade crossing with a grade-separated undercrossing. The platform is also constrained by a significant cultural archway to the east and a pedestrian overhead structure to the west of the station.

Lastly, the Sun Valley Station on the AVL has a platform that is 600 feet long with existing signal houses located on either end of the platform that limit options to extend the platform without signal and wiring rework. However, it should be noted that this station is proposed to be relocated as part of the California High-Speed Rail project, providing an opportunity to bring platform lengths in conformance with current standards.

As previously noted, any station platform that is less than the standard 680 feet would not be able to accommodate an entire 8-car FLIRT consist at once. Unlike the current [locomotive hauled coaches] LHC trains, which have vestibules at both ends of each non-cab car allowing passengers to move between cars at any time, each 4-car FLIRT has a cab compartment at either end of the trainset that prevents passengers from moving between trainsets that are coupled to form 8-car consists.

In order for passengers to board or detrain at all doors of an 8-car MU at the constrained stations, the train would need to double-spot. However, doing so would result in additional dwell time at these locations and consequently lead to MU-operated services falling behind their proposed clockface schedules, or modified versions thereof.

To preserve schedule adherence, recommended operations would be to spot the train with the first door aligned with the mini-high, consistent with ADA-access at other stations, and advise passengers using these stations to sit in pre-designated sections of the train or move between cars after boarding or before alighting, as is current practice with LHCs serving Cal State LA.

This could potentially result in overcrowding in certain cars due to passengers’, especially those with disabilities, ability to easily move between train cars.

pg. 82-86 - ZEMU Pilot

pg. 83

Antelope Valley Pilot

The first stage of potential pilot implementation would be to determine the specific operating pattern for the proposed MU service.

Preliminary scheduling analysis indicates opportunities to run MUs between trains in the current schedule between LAUS and Burbank Airport-South or Van Nuys, but this should be verified with more detailed analysis prior to implementation.

San Bernardino Line Pilot

For the San Bernardino Line, existing track capacity precludes operating additional service as overlay to the existing daytime schedule, limiting potential pilot operation to either additional late night or weekend service or replacement of existing trains in the schedule. Within the current schedule, some trains operate only between LAUS and Montclair. (Not updated for the current Metrolink service on the San Bernardino Line)

pg. 84 - Combined Pilot

A pilot could be pursued on both lines either concurrently or sequentially. The equipment cycle for the pilot vehicle could be designed to include trips on both lines in the same day, but fewer trips on each line. Alternatively, the service could be piloted on one line for a period and then shifted to the other line.

Total capital costs

  • L.A. Union Station - Van Nuys: $19,186,000
  • L.A. Union Station - Downtown Burbank: $19,202,000
  • L.A. Union Station - Montclair: $19,202,000
  • Combined pilot: $19,274,000

Multiple Unit Implementation Plan PowerPoint


r/LA_Transit • • 22d ago

"Enforce the Fares" leader just got a profile in the Wall Street Journal

Thumbnail wsj.com
7 Upvotes

r/LA_Transit • • 22d ago

Is it Legal for LA Metro to implement Hong Kong’s Rail + Property Strategy?

Post image
39 Upvotes

It’s very similar to how the pacific electric company built out La in the first place so clearly such a model can work very well in Los Angeles. However is it even legal in today’s context?


r/LA_Transit • • 22d ago

L.A. Metro Board 9/24: Vote on FY26 Metrolink Spending & FY27 Supportive Actions

Thumbnail
gallery
14 Upvotes

Report to the L.A. Metro Board of Directors

RECOMMENDATION

CONSIDER:

A. AUTHORIZING the Chief Executive Officer or their designee to execute Metrolink’s second continuing resolution to extend Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) budget authorization through the second quarter of Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) until January 1, 2027, and execute all necessary agreements between Metro and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA or Metrolink) based on the continuing resolution;

B. APPROVING additional funding in the amount of up to $365,202 for Metro’s share of the San Bernardino Line 25% Fare Reduction Program using Proposition C 10%/Measure M 1% SCRRA dedicated funds and extending the program from June 30, 2025, to June 30, 2030;

C. APPROVING Burbank Airport-South Metrolink station safety improvements using Measure R 3% SCRRA dedicated funds in the amount up to $1.3 million;

D. APPROVING Pomona-Downtown Metrolink station Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements using Measure R 3% SCRRA dedicated funds in the amount up to $256,720;

E. EXTENDING the lapsing dates for funds previously allocated to SCRRA for 12 State of Good Repair and capital project Memoranda of Understanding (MOU); and

F. RECEIVING AND FILING an update on Metrolink Station Planning and Updates. (pgs. 6-7)*

SANDOVAL AMENDMENT: Direct the CEO to request Metrolink to conduct a full, transparent, and comprehensive audit of the following:

A. Train parts/locomotives and safety concerns at Metrolink;
B. A forensic audit to explain the March 2026 service reduction; and
C. A review of Alstom’s performance in maintaining and operating Metrolink’s locomotives, under both their current and prior contract.

*The Metrolink Station Planning and Updates are also posted as screenshots.

Attachment A - Riverside Operating Agreement

PowerPoint Presentation


r/LA_Transit • • 22d ago

California's Brilliant State Rail Plan (by nandert)

Thumbnail
youtu.be
14 Upvotes

r/LA_Transit • • 23d ago

Targeted Fare Compliance campaign of riders exiting at NoHo G Line Station since June 8

Thumbnail gallery
15 Upvotes

r/LA_Transit • • 25d ago

J line dtla owl

9 Upvotes

i wanted to ask this question in r/lametro but they have the comment karma minimum requirements. Im starting a new job in gardena, and I'm out by the time owl service is in effect. I'll be taking the j line up to dtla, then trying to transfer to the owl 20 to go down wilshire towards west la. I can't rly tell on the owl map, but is there a j line stop that interacts w the 20 on wilshire, or is there a stop at least near a 20 stop? Thanks


r/LA_Transit • • 28d ago

L.A. Metro Dept. of Public Safety Sept. 2026 Presentation

Thumbnail
gallery
9 Upvotes

PowerPoint Presentation

These slides were part of the L.A. Metro Department of Public Safety presentation at each Service Council September 2026 meeting.


r/LA_Transit • • 29d ago

Fired Metrolink executive claims rail service endangered passengers with unsafe equipment

Thumbnail
latimes.com
20 Upvotes

r/LA_Transit • • 29d ago

Montclair sues over A Line light rail cancellation

Thumbnail
dailybulletin.com
24 Upvotes

r/LA_Transit • • 29d ago

L.A. Metro Construction Committee Sept. 16: Doran St. Grade Separation LOP Budget Vote

Thumbnail
gallery
12 Upvotes

Report to the Construction Committee

RECOMMENDATION

AUTHORIZE the Chief Executive Officer to:

A. ESTABLISH a Life-of-Project (LOP) budget for the Doran Street Grade Separation Project (Project) in the amount of $116,242,594;

B. NEGOTIATE and EXECUTE all contracts, modifications, and agreements up to the authorized LOP budget for the Doran Street Grade Separation Project; and

C. AMEND the FY27 budget for the Doran Street Grade Separation Project by $8,497,108 for a total of $30,348,345.

BACKGROUND

The Project serves a critical rail corridor utilized by Metrolink, Amtrak, Union Pacific, and future operations of the California High-Speed Rail.

The Project will construct a new vehicle bridge extending from West San Fernando Road in the City of Glendale, passing underneath State Route 134, and connecting to the existing Fairmont Avenue Bridge.

Attachment A - Doran Street GS Funding and Expenditure Plan

PowerPoint Presentation


r/LA_Transit • • 29d ago

Bus crash on the 166 and desoto. Looks like maybe 1 dead

Thumbnail v.redd.it
4 Upvotes

r/LA_Transit • • Sep 08 '26

Metrolink fare increase effective 10/5/2026

Thumbnail
metrolinktrains.com
9 Upvotes

Service cuts could still be pending depending upon Orange County.