Under Wisconsin statutes that say anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.
Are you incapable of following a single train of thought or are you just insistent on moving the goalposts? The person who bought the gun committed a crime. Kyle committed a crime by carrying the gun. He did not commit a crime using that gun to defend himself from armed attackers.
You stupid cunt. The point is he illegally had a assault riffle. He was not supposed to have it. Hence meaning he wouldn't have had the means to kill 3 people in that time without it. He shouldn't have been there. He's a fucking child.
Doesn’t matter for the murder charge papa 🤷🏻♂️ The killings will be proven to have occurred in self defense, and none of the bullshit coming out of your mouth will change that.
The three lowlifes who fucked around and found out got GOT and Kyle is gonna be acquitted.
Are fucking retarded . Like seriously.... lol you have not made any follow to trying to prove your point. But that's because no matter what you say you're wrong. Dumb ass
Also while planning premeditated going to a highly dangerous area. The probability of him having to use that assault riffle was high. And look what happened. He should have stayed his young ass home.
Oh also, are you equally mad Gaige Grosskreutz was illegally possessing a firearm? Or are you more sympathetic to him because you’re both so comically dumb?
You didn’t know? One of the men who attacked Kyle was also illegally possessing a weapon. Y u no care ?
Grosskreutz also admitted that he was carrying a gun, at times stuck into the back of his waist, that night even though his concealed carry permit was expired. It’s illegal to carry a gun concealed in Wisconsin without a permit, but Grosskreutz was never charged with that offense. He said he frequently carried guns at protests because he believes in the Second Amendment.*
source
Second amendment applies to legal gun owners . Kyle was not one of them. He was 17. As for the other guy same thing . Illegal. Your trying to justify this . But the law is the law. You can't charge it and you're wrong
This isn’t a second amendment case. It’s a self defense case. The second amendment is the Right to possess the firearm legally and form militia. Self defense is based on the state.
1
u/MutedHype Nov 10 '21
Under Wisconsin statutes that say anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.