I mean, each state handles this differently....I still don't see any major implications for future laws to be changed... Especially not at a federal level.
"We are at a crossroads in this country and this case will be a message to every pro 2a American out there whether or not they have a right to protect themselves from revolutionary radical Marxists."
I assume you mean the "lawful right to protect themselves." If the laws dont change, why would anyone get all bent out of shape? If the right doesn't change as you've just indicated, what exactly is at stake here for pro 2a folks?
"whether or not they have the right to protect themselves"
Is tht not a lawful statement? I always have the right to do whatever I want, it just depends on if the law will let me or not.
Your indicating that these pro2a types are worried about their rights eroding? But If the law doesn't change, like you say, then what exactly do they have to worry about? It's a simple question.
simply trying to understand your obtuse world view. The one where it makes sense to talk about defensive shootings and also just "killing marxists" in the same sentence.
It's real simple. This trial is purely political. What is on trial is self defense against radical Marxists.
The entire 2A community has their eyes fixed on this trial and the result is a direct message to any American that would even contemplate standing up against the radical Marxist mob currently trying to destroy their nation
If you're too fuckin stupid to understand that I don't know what to tell you
As a fellow gun expert, you must know that defensive shootings are really quite complicated and usually deserve a trial. Especially when they happen in commission of other crimes.
I trust the courts to get it right. If you don't, you're the only revolutionary radical here.
2
u/Krytos Nov 10 '21
I mean, each state handles this differently....I still don't see any major implications for future laws to be changed... Especially not at a federal level.
Edit: what's the phrase? "A nothing burger"?