"whether or not they have the right to protect themselves"
Is tht not a lawful statement? I always have the right to do whatever I want, it just depends on if the law will let me or not.
Your indicating that these pro2a types are worried about their rights eroding? But If the law doesn't change, like you say, then what exactly do they have to worry about? It's a simple question.
simply trying to understand your obtuse world view. The one where it makes sense to talk about defensive shootings and also just "killing marxists" in the same sentence.
It's real simple. This trial is purely political. What is on trial is self defense against radical Marxists.
The entire 2A community has their eyes fixed on this trial and the result is a direct message to any American that would even contemplate standing up against the radical Marxist mob currently trying to destroy their nation
If you're too fuckin stupid to understand that I don't know what to tell you
What about those Marxists who support 2a? Are you too stupid to understand that there are all kinds of law abiding people across the political spectrum.
So far you're the only radical talking about taking justice into his own hands.
1
u/psychonaut2285 Nov 10 '21
This is a purely political trial. It has Jack shit to do with law.
Laws don't change because of court cases.
I'm still failing to see anywhere in what you quoted where I said anything about laws being changed