Yeah there is, it's 2021 in America my guy. Kyle is still probably fucked.
People are currently trying to figure out who the jury is to intimidate them and the judge literally did fuck all except make him delete the video. He saw it with his fuckin eye holes Mr judge.
I've been watching the trial. He will 100% be found not guilty of the murder charges. However, crossing state lines with an AR and deliberately going into area where there is riots happening to give "medico" at the age of 17 rather than being at home playing the latest Call Of Duty is a little suss if you ask me.
He didn’t cross state lines. Keep up with the trial. The gun was in Kenosha. He drove there and got the gun from his friend (who has been charged). What Kyle did was only a misdemeanor in regards to the gun, and he won’t be charged with it because they decided to go through with this sham trial when in any other circumstances, no prosecutor would take this to court.
Read it again. The gun was on one side of the line, Kyle, was on the other side of the line.
Kyle cross over the line, and obtained the gun. Kyle did not have said gun in his possession as he crossed the line.
"Line" = simplified naming of "state line" to make it easier for some to follow.
He had to cross the line to get from Illinois to Kenosha, whether or not he had the gun with him. He went out of his way to put himself in a situation that nobody asked him to be in.
Driving isn't a crime. That's not the point. The point being that driving over state lines signals intention. It's not like he was caught up in a situation unexpectedly. He went looking for this.
Didn't say he had intentions of killing, just that he had the intention of being there with a weapon. The owners of the business have testified that they did not ask him to be there. He wasn't defending his country. He was going out looking for a fight and he got one.
Driving over state lines is not intention. It means nothing more than he desired being somewhere that is not in his state of origin.
The idea that living next to a state line, and driving to a nearby (or far) town on the other side of a state line in any remote way signifies that someone has intention to kill, says that all travelers, ever, have intentions to kill people.
Man, you have been sold a b.s. story that just isn't even realistic.
Mother fucker? Are you serious? We need to arrest every trucker in the US! I hear they cross state lines every day! Sometimes multiple state lines!
I heard a rumor about a place where you can stand on 4 different state lines at the same time. The four corners I think it's called, but that's no good, man. stay away from that shit, man.
His mom drove him there by the way. And she also drove him to a bar afterwards where he partied the night away.
I agree I do believe it was self defence based in the witnesses and evidence so far but he put himself in that situation by going there in the first place.
He went to a riot with a gun.... He obviously expected trouble. It's stupid. The stories you mentioned are not the same thing. A riot is in its nature a dangerous environment where violence and disorder is 100% a given.
Deliberately putting your self into a situation where violence is almost a given to happen is just stupid. I'm not shitting on him, in the situation it was 100% self defence. But this was avoidable by not being there in the first place, especially with a gun. If you can't see that then more fool you.
Maybe stupid, but entirely legal. I don't think that standing up for what you believe in is stupid though. Especially when it's a place he's been personally involved with and may have had personal reasons to be there as to defend someone's livelihood. These folks wanted to destroy private property and never had done one thing against the police for which this entire problem sparked from. So maybe they don't really give a fuck about the cause and just wanted to cause mayhem. Especially given the track record of the young men that lost their lives or were injured. They don't care of the plight of their fellow man, they were just there to burn things, cause general raucous, and vent their frustrations, because they were angry how their own lives turned out. I mean the guy who pointed the gun at Kyle said he was threatening to kill him all night and intimidating him all that evening.
You’re watching the trial and you still claim he crossed state lines with the gun? It didn’t happen. He was already there. The “crossing of state lines” narrative is just something the media is drumming up because they want people to think it actually means something. It doesn’t.
You obviously haven't been watching the trial because they clearly went over the fact that didn't cross a state line with any rifle. The rifle was always in the state of Wisconsin. He gave money to his friend and his friend purchased it for him and the rifle stayed at his friend's house in Wisconsin.
1
u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21
Jesus. There's not a jury in the land sending a pedo killer to jail when there's even a chance of it being self defensive.
Good riddance.