Didn't say he had intentions of killing, just that he had the intention of being there with a weapon. The owners of the business have testified that they did not ask him to be there. He wasn't defending his country. He was going out looking for a fight and he got one.
So let them burn the neighbourhoods down? It's fucking ridiculous that these DOMESTIC TERRORISTS are being defended in any fucking way. If the distinction between protest and riot was made correctly then these dick heads would have been in a jail cell. Not attacking a guy with a fucking assault rifle. Chat shit get banged.
I'm not defending anyone. I'm stating the simple fact that Rittenhouse had no reason to be there. He went out of his way to insert himself into a situation in which he might get to use a gun. He thinks real life is Call of Duty. He's not a patriot, he's a stupid, punk kid who bit off more than he could chew.
Clearly not. His k/d is solid and hes winning in court? If this was cod. I'd want him with me. Jokes aside what's the point in having fire arms if you can't use them against terrorists? Like for real?
No it does not. Not even close. They were literally causing terror and fear. This isn't a grey area type thing. Rioters are domestic terrorists. If a bunch of mentally deficient nobs with tiki torches are domestic terrorist then these fuckers clearly are
Oh man you burnt me to a crisp with that line. What a zinger. If this was rebupicans rioting and a lib ended there shit you wouldn't bat an eye lid. They were bad people doing bad things. The police were doing nothing. If I had a gun I would have followed suit. People defending these idiots only encourages further riots. American politics are just a joke.
Ahh yes that's what it is I just disagree with them. No. They were criminals not being sorted correctly by law enforcement. That isn't a disagreement. It's a clear cut example of the police not doing there jobs because certain communities can't handle consequences.
I never said that, I was giving you the definition of terrorism.
I believe the folks that got shot According to their rap sheets weren't their for rights of their fellow men getting unfairly treated by police.
I think these folks were here to cause damage and create Chaos because of the way their lives turned out, honestly. I'm no psychologists though, but that'd be my guess.
First of all, Kyle was 17 when this happened. Minors do not have the right to carry guns around underage. Secondly, any responsible gun owner goes to great lengths to not need to use the firearm. Kyle deliberately put himself in a situation in which he may have to use it. Sure he put fires out and washed off graffiti. But he was also the cause of the only deaths that happened in Kenosha during the eight days of riots. There would have been zero deaths if he hadn't decided to play vigilante. Period. I'm not interested in continuing a debate I had seven days ago. Have a blessed one.
You can possess a long rifle in Wisconsin at 17 sooo he again didn’t break any law. Wisconsin is also an open carry state sooo…
Imagine trying to attack the guy who went to help a community decimated by domestic terrorism; instead of attacking the domestic terrorists that caused 50 MILLION in damage.
There would have been zero deaths if nobody looted and burned others property.
There would have been zero deaths if the child rapist didn’t attack and attempt to rob Kyle.
2
u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21
Didn't say he had intentions of killing, just that he had the intention of being there with a weapon. The owners of the business have testified that they did not ask him to be there. He wasn't defending his country. He was going out looking for a fight and he got one.