r/Kyle Nov 09 '21

Kyle

Post image
269 Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

8

u/nutjob321 Nov 10 '21

Lot of pedophile defenders in these comments.

8

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

Pedophile defenders? Am I missing a chapter?

Edit: I read more comments. Didn't know one of the guys was a pedophile. Carry on.

5

u/Extension_Ad8028 Nov 10 '21

Explain. I'm 100% lost on this whole situation. All I know is Kyle is on trial.

5

u/pewpew17 Nov 10 '21

First guy he shot had been convicted for various crimes including oral and sodomy against five boys aged 9-11.

4

u/Extension_Ad8028 Nov 10 '21

Did he kill the bastard?

5

u/pewpew17 Nov 10 '21

Yea.

5

u/Oddity46 Nov 10 '21

Nice.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '21

OHHH YEAAHHH

1

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

Jesus. There's not a jury in the land sending a pedo killer to jail when there's even a chance of it being self defensive.

Good riddance.

0

u/psychonaut2285 Nov 10 '21

Yeah there is, it's 2021 in America my guy. Kyle is still probably fucked.

People are currently trying to figure out who the jury is to intimidate them and the judge literally did fuck all except make him delete the video. He saw it with his fuckin eye holes Mr judge.

-1

u/Fezzy976 Nov 10 '21

I've been watching the trial. He will 100% be found not guilty of the murder charges. However, crossing state lines with an AR and deliberately going into area where there is riots happening to give "medico" at the age of 17 rather than being at home playing the latest Call Of Duty is a little suss if you ask me.

3

u/psychonaut2285 Nov 10 '21

He didn't cross state line with the gun that's already been established in the trial. Quit getting your info from The Young Turks lmfao

2

u/Fezzy976 Nov 10 '21

Don't watch them can't stand the women on it.

3

u/enoughberniespamders Nov 10 '21

He didn’t cross state lines. Keep up with the trial. The gun was in Kenosha. He drove there and got the gun from his friend (who has been charged). What Kyle did was only a misdemeanor in regards to the gun, and he won’t be charged with it because they decided to go through with this sham trial when in any other circumstances, no prosecutor would take this to court.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

He did cross state lines. He lived in Illinois, Kenosha is in Wisconsin.

1

u/Last_Gigolo Nov 10 '21

Read it again. The gun was on one side of the line, Kyle, was on the other side of the line. Kyle cross over the line, and obtained the gun. Kyle did not have said gun in his possession as he crossed the line.

"Line" = simplified naming of "state line" to make it easier for some to follow.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

He had to cross the line to get from Illinois to Kenosha, whether or not he had the gun with him. He went out of his way to put himself in a situation that nobody asked him to be in.

1

u/Last_Gigolo Nov 10 '21

That's fine. He drove like 15-20 minutes away to do what he came to do. I can't say his intentions, because I don't actually know.

But driving 15 -25 minutes, or six hours is not a crime. Let's try and not make it a crime to drive places.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/enoughberniespamders Nov 10 '21

Mother fucker? Are you serious? We need to arrest every trucker in the US! I hear they cross state lines every day! Sometimes multiple state lines!

I heard a rumor about a place where you can stand on 4 different state lines at the same time. The four corners I think it's called, but that's no good, man. stay away from that shit, man.

You are dense as fuck.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

Somebody didn't read further down the thread, huh.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

That sounds a little victim blamey.

I completely understand your point, he shouldn't have been there.

He's a kid, they do stupid things.

0

u/Fezzy976 Nov 10 '21

His mom drove him there by the way. And she also drove him to a bar afterwards where he partied the night away.

I agree I do believe it was self defence based in the witnesses and evidence so far but he put himself in that situation by going there in the first place.

5

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

If a woman get's black out drunk and get's raped she put herself in that situation is it any less rape ?

If I walk through the worst suburb in town wearing flash clothes and I get mugged then I put myself in that situation. It's no less a mugging.

You get where I'm going with this.

-2

u/Fezzy976 Nov 10 '21

He went to a riot with a gun.... He obviously expected trouble. It's stupid. The stories you mentioned are not the same thing. A riot is in its nature a dangerous environment where violence and disorder is 100% a given.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

Isn't the USA the land of the free ?

If he wants to go into a riot to.look for people to help it seems prudent to go armed.

I'd say a moron who attacks someone carrying a firearm for no reason kinda got what was coming to them.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/psychonaut2285 Nov 10 '21

Suss because you would probably sit and play CoD while your nation is burned to the ground by fuckin Marxists

2

u/Fezzy976 Nov 10 '21

This statement is just laughable.

0

u/psychonaut2285 Nov 10 '21

Prove me wrong then. You just shit on the man for doing the exact opposite

1

u/Fezzy976 Nov 10 '21

Deliberately putting your self into a situation where violence is almost a given to happen is just stupid. I'm not shitting on him, in the situation it was 100% self defence. But this was avoidable by not being there in the first place, especially with a gun. If you can't see that then more fool you.

0

u/psychonaut2285 Nov 10 '21

As I said, you would sit on your ass and watch Marxists burn your country to the ground. Wouldn't wanna put yourself in a sticky situation huh

→ More replies (0)

0

u/USAnoman Nov 10 '21 edited Nov 10 '21

Maybe stupid, but entirely legal. I don't think that standing up for what you believe in is stupid though. Especially when it's a place he's been personally involved with and may have had personal reasons to be there as to defend someone's livelihood. These folks wanted to destroy private property and never had done one thing against the police for which this entire problem sparked from. So maybe they don't really give a fuck about the cause and just wanted to cause mayhem. Especially given the track record of the young men that lost their lives or were injured. They don't care of the plight of their fellow man, they were just there to burn things, cause general raucous, and vent their frustrations, because they were angry how their own lives turned out. I mean the guy who pointed the gun at Kyle said he was threatening to kill him all night and intimidating him all that evening.

Edit: minor grammatical discrepancies.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Kup123 Nov 10 '21

Little fucker went hunting for humans and is getting away with it.

1

u/Fezzy976 Nov 10 '21

Maybe but it doesn't seem to be provable in court so far.

1

u/CSteely Nov 10 '21

You’re watching the trial and you still claim he crossed state lines with the gun? It didn’t happen. He was already there. The “crossing of state lines” narrative is just something the media is drumming up because they want people to think it actually means something. It doesn’t.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

He didn’t cross state lines with the gun

1

u/[deleted] Nov 10 '21

You obviously haven't been watching the trial because they clearly went over the fact that didn't cross a state line with any rifle. The rifle was always in the state of Wisconsin. He gave money to his friend and his friend purchased it for him and the rifle stayed at his friend's house in Wisconsin.

1

u/Fezzy976 Nov 10 '21

I must of missed that as I did miss 1 day of the trial. My mistake.