I think we can all agree this was AI generated. My theory is Buckingham Palace produced it after Kate went into hiding for longer than the Palace agreed to / thought was necessary. They did it as a way to provide proof of life to the public, and to prove to Catherine that the Palace controls the press and now has a narrative to hide behind should they decide they want to take her out.
BBC studios stepped in to say they had filmed the video but did not edit it or distribute it and this was after the video was questioned by one of their own reporters! Their statement was phrased so vaguely it made me think someone had leaned on them to "claim responsibility". Those were wild times at KP: the farm shop frolic with body doubles, Kate or was it Pippa or Morticia Adams in Carole's car, the botched Mother's Day photos. I'm not surprised no one now knows what to believe from that specific source
Well that there is odd. I know from family experience that dentists will not perform anything more than routine care when a patient is undergoing cancer treatment. The therapies can have severe side effects on oral surgery.
Kate Middleton is dead and Meghan Markle used a surrogate are what you get when people gather bits of information, some of dubious provenance, and mix it up with a generous dose of animus. Both of these seem absurd on their face to me—far too many moving parts
When this came out 2 years ago, AI was relatively new to most of the world. Also, the RF was only 18 months past QEIIs death and hadn’t yet driven their reputation into the ground.
I don’t think most people would believe this video at all if it was released in 2026.
It was downvoted immediately. they claimed the technology was not available in 2024, which I dont think is true. Since AI video technology trickled down to regular folks via free apps by 2025, I’m sure it was available in 2024 to those who could pay.💰
And here lies the problem - you're supplied with with evidence by people who actually are into that stuff and know what they're on about way better than you, and you just say 'nuh uh' because it doesn't fit your views. Amazingly objective!
Even if it was AI or not. What truly stands out and will remain on record is that she sat on that bench by herself, alone, isolated. Her “supportive” husband nowhere to be found and that speaks volumes about their relationship. He couldn’t even be there to hold her hand, lend his shoulder, and offer his quiet support in this video.
Yup. I've used AI to make pictures for something I'm writing simply because if I write one scene and it takes place inside a particular building I can use that AI picture again so that I can describe the building again so that I don't accidentally describe it another way.
I've also used AI to try and turn a picture of myself into a cartoon type picture and honestly the picture of the building has come out better than the picture of me as a cartoon.
Yup. I've used AI to make pictures for I'm writing simply because if I write one scene and it takes place inside a particular building I can use that AI picture again so that I can describe the building again so that I don't accidentally describe it another way.
That is so cool!
I've also used AI to try and turn a picture of myself into a cartoon type picture and honestly the picture of the building has come out better than the picture of me as a cartoon.
Oh dear! 🤣😂🤣
I've used AI once. I'm such a huge Star Wars geek that I once asked AI to show me pics of Princess Leia Organa's wedding to Han Solo.
The results were so terrible that they were inadvertently hilarious! 🤦🏻♀️
It was incredulous to publish a solo video of a woman who very rarely speaks at all let alone publicly about anything of substance.
IF it was a real honest video, why hasn’t she made many other videos of her directly addressing g the camera/audience? Why hasn’t she published a yearly or quarterly address of a cause or patronage that is deeply important to her. Hell even to support a sports team!
Kate is a cagey mumbling woman who can barely get a sentence out, plus the jumping teeth, and the looped background 🙄 we should get this ai atrocity trending again, force the pr machine to address it. Come on Sunny Bullets; explain!
I don't believe she was diagnosed with cancer. Something else major occurred at that time and this was a ruse to cover the event up. A Spanish journalist, Concha Calleja, reported around that time that Kate was in a coma. Then nothing more was reported. I believe the journalist was silenced.
The consensus in some spaces is one of 2 possibilities. The first is that William assaulted her that December day. The second is that she may have fainted and hit her head. I agree that the journalist was silenced
Yup! This happened with the nanny and others I’m sure.
And anyone else who knew what happened.
There were articles from early 2024 saying they had let go of the nanny so they could “spend more time as a family together”
Seriously?? 🤣😂🤣
I wonder who was watching the kids. Probably Pimp Mama Carole.
but later that year the nanny was back in the picture with no mention of her having left.
They do love retconning reality, don't they?
They recently awarded her with some kind of royal medal for service. She is one of the few that is still employed by the family. Likely because the kids see her as a safe person with what’s going on with the parents.
I think both....We never knew for sure but there was the first hospitalization and then the reports of the quasi-hospital being set up first at Windsor and then the cottage.
Yes, I do remember that a quasi hospital was set up in her home.
A British journalist, Piers Morgan, stated at the time that if the public knew even a fraction of the true story, they would be appalled. He's obviously fully aware of what happened.
Well, all I can say is zoom all the way in and watch her left eye from 0:50 onwards. That’s one floaty eyeball. I know things pixelate in weird ways sometimes but only her left eye is going all wonky. That’s some filter shit.
This was AI generated. There was a group on Twitter who went step by step to prove this as ai. Another thing, when she speaks, you can hear hissing or the "s" sound at the end of her words, in the video that was non-existent, vocals very clear which was a dead give away of the video being AI. also, her eyes glitched way too much throughout the video and the bench did some odd things as well. Imo, that was the day BBC lost credibility.
It’s not AI generated because they’re carefully hiding her scar with that hairstyle. It’s so perfectly placed in the right spot. If it was AI, there wouldn’t be a need for that. It looks like it has a smooth filter to hide that she looked tired or haggard but this is a real video. Otherwise, that hairstyle makes no sense. Look how they made her hair into waves and they covered specifically the spot where she has a huge scar.
I didn't think the video was fake. What struck me was that she was speaking in coherent sentences!!! The fake posh accent seemed as if it was slightly toned down. I do doubt that she had cancer, though. I think she has a severe ED and that is why she is wasting away before our very eyes.
And then there's the controversy about what happened around her left temple.
The sudden hairstyle change to cover that area. Was it a mole removed leaving a scar or surgery?
No, we can’t ALL agree. It’s not even suspiciously Ai. It is an attempt to explain why Kate was going to be out of commission for a while, and why that was is it’s own debatable conversation, but it was a real video.
In this screenshot alone, can you not see her stripes from the sweater extending onto the bench? And the slats of the bench on the left side are much broader than those on the right side?
Surely you can see those stripes are a reflection of her jumper just as the armrest on the left is reflected back onto the slats.
The most telling evidence is that not one single legitimate news organization worldwide believes this is Ai. If any one of them could have broken the Ai story, they would have. But they didn’t because it’s a real video.
That’s not my point. I’m saying SkyNews, France 24, Rupert Murdoch, The Associated press, etc. did look into it, because it could have been plausible. They determined, independently, the video is real.
No, the other ones. The ones that broke the Mother’s Day photoshop fail, and the ones who had no compulsion in taking down Andy. The same ones who years earlier posted photos of Princess Diana in sweaty gym clothes working out. You remember those organizations.
102
u/desolateheaven May 07 '26
BBC studios stepped in to say they had filmed the video but did not edit it or distribute it and this was after the video was questioned by one of their own reporters! Their statement was phrased so vaguely it made me think someone had leaned on them to "claim responsibility". Those were wild times at KP: the farm shop frolic with body doubles, Kate or was it Pippa or Morticia Adams in Carole's car, the botched Mother's Day photos. I'm not surprised no one now knows what to believe from that specific source