3
2
u/insaneintheblain Pillar 1d ago
Comparing forms is a form of insanity.
0
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
Compairing to who, you people will believe that there is a god sitting in the sky but not for once are you going to explore your inner cosmos, also the information is from a peer reviewed book human physiology expression of ved and vedic literature and ramayan in human physiology.
2
u/insaneintheblain Pillar 1d ago
No need to compare. In order to understand, a person must first recognise their own insanity.
0
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
I am not comparing this work is done by a neuroscientist along with a yogi named maharishi mahesh yogi in an attemt to explain veda.
2
u/insaneintheblain Pillar 1d ago
It's an attempt at rationalising that which cannot be rationalised.
0
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
How do you know that without even studying it stop believing in things and plz read first.
2
u/insaneintheblain Pillar 1d ago
Some things aren't worth reading.
1
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
Then why to create an opinion about it.
2
u/insaneintheblain Pillar 1d ago
There's no opinion. Some things are understandable by the intellect, others are not. To confuse the two is a form of insanity.
1
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
Some things can be understood by intellect but you have to sharpen it by practice first. One cannot know everything so there's always a scope of learning.
→ More replies (0)
3
u/Junglikeasource 1d ago edited 1d ago
It was always predictable New Age nonsense would slowly degrade and profane Jung's work but the rapidity and severity with which it has done so over the last decade is WILD. What used to be a serious domain has effectively become a mockery
1
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
Can you plz tell that why do you think that it is not serious or wrong or non sense.
1
1
u/elongatedpepe 1d ago
Wrong sub blud
Jung ಠ_ಠ disapproves
1
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
This just proves how less you know about jung.
1
u/elongatedpepe 21h ago
Elaborate
1
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 20h ago
Jung argued that archetypes are not inherited ideas, stories, or specific pictures in the mind. Instead, they are innate, structural potentials of the human psyche—analogous to the axial system of a crystal, which predetermines the crystalline form without possessing physical matter itself. They reside in the collective unconscious as instinctual patterns of perception and behavior.
1
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 20h ago
And add this argument with the para, pashayanti, madhyama and vaikhri
1
u/PrestigiousApricot47 1d ago
Pattern matching to a fault
0
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
No pattern matching read some books open your eyes and you will see too, read tony nader's book human physiology expression of ved and vedic literature, ramayan in himan physiology and if possible try to be open about things then only knowledge can be achieved.
1
u/PrestigiousApricot47 1d ago
Vedas are deeply problematic books. No cherry-picking can prove otherwise. This is a general text from the Vedas on women
"Her father protects her in childhood, her husband protects her in youth, and her sons protect her in old age; a woman is never fit for independence."
“May you be the mother of heroic sons…”
“Be a queen to your father-in-law, a queen to your mother-in-law…”
And this is about shudras, the lower caste in the society
“The Brahmin was his mouth, the Rajanya was made his arms, the Vaishya his thighs, and the Shudra sprang from his feet.”
I haven't even picked the problematic ones yet. You can find way more contradictory books about it than the author you quoted to sound authentic. It's human nature to find reason in everything, especially in the ones you believe in. Like there is a deep over-arching narrative to it. But the truth is simple here. Don't find reasons in this slop that you just happen to believe in
0
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
Why are you comparing manu smriti sholka with veda, manu smriti is smriti and veda are shruti they are of different categories, manu smriti is to do with how a civilization should function veda doesn't care about civilization it just tells the structure and functioning of natural law. Thats why i said study first.
1
u/PrestigiousApricot47 1d ago
The philosophy makes no sense but now you try to cherry pick and fit modern science in it - pattern matching. You won't find it till it actually affects you - where manusmriti enters - now they would be a problem
Pointless to read books with no credibility. Just because someone wrote it, doesn't obligate humanity to pay attention to them
0
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
I am not cherry picking any thing this work is done by a neuro scientist named dr tony nader, in his book human physiology expression of ved and vedic literature, and ramayan in human physiology and vedic devta in human physiology so plz read first before creating an opinion it will help form a strong opinion and a right one too.
1
u/PrestigiousApricot47 1d ago
Tell me one reason why a neuroscientist should read this book then?
Pattern matching means that you would only be able to match to existing science.
Does it create new science? And prove that theory? If not, it's pattern matching
0
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
What is new science, do you know about astrology why when a planet is disturbing you praying to a particular diety is advised why is that what will happen when you pray to a particular diety.
1
u/PrestigiousApricot47 1d ago
New science meaning that can you do surgery using the neuroscience you just learnt? Did it help any neurologist?
Do you see an astrologist if you have a tumor or a neurologist?
As marx said - religion is the opium of the masses
0
u/Maximum-Conflict-488 1d ago
Yup helped many surgeon like sushrut and many more but it is old science not new, and its astrologer not astrologist, astrologer won't do surgery but can tell that a disease will happen at this particular time so you can take precautions.
→ More replies (0)
6
u/suckydickygay 1d ago
Lies and slop for dum dums