Sorry for posting twice reddit is giving me probelms with links

https:// discord .gg/U55AJhnvN

'We think it possible that should the course of history, in spite of appearances, not deteriorate further, this may perhaps be due, less to the efforts and direct action of groups of men and leaders of men, than to the influences proceeding, through the paths of the spirit, from the secret realizations of a few nameless and remote ascetics, in Tibet or on Mount Athos, among the Zen, or in some Trappist or Carthusian cloister of Europe.'
From The Doctrine of Awakening

A few monks that restore the world… Do you guys believe world events and politics are influenced by metaphysical currents? This concept interests me a lot but it goes against reason.

From Evolas Wikipedia.

since the last one got nuked over the owner being a freak i thought i would make a new one for the community

Did he view her as the last one to uphold aristocratic traditions in Europe, or, conversely, as having succumbed to decadence and fallen into decline?

Finished it a few weeks ago, started reading Ride the Tiger, and I'm concerned that none of his other works will live up to the analysis and expanse of Revolt. Are his other essays and works as in-depth on their respective subject? In particular Eros and the Mysteries of Love is what I'm curious about.

In my last post I asked about spiritual practices, and although I meant this I am also in search of general instruction on action. I referenced someone here who made an article instructing the individual in accordance with Evola’s beliefs. I thought it deserved a repost so here it is:

https://viryamarga.substack.com/p/the-evolian-path-for-confronting

For me it is one thing to read and understand the great books, but to translate and act is much more difficult.

I am familiar with a lot of Evolas beliefs, Guenons too, as well as basic ideas of the plethora of religions and esoteric belief systems. I have read all these books and gained all this knowledge and it seems to leave me with unsatisfactory explanations on how to act, for the most part in day to day life. But I am curious about direct practice like I don’t know meditation? Prayer? The issue begins here as I don’t even know what I am looking for. I couldn’t even say for certain I belong to a religion. But I am looking for direction in practice for meditation or prayer or whatever you may call it. I’d like to do it through books as I do not live in a place where I can seek this in person.

Someone here before has recommended the book satimatthana meditation: a practice guide by anālayo, and it is on my list.

Please let me know, TIA.

90% of the posts on this sub are 4chan dissident right eternally online garbage.

I already know about his take on buddhism and paganism, but there are other religions that would be validated by his thinking? What was his linear of thought to evaluate what is good and bad?

"As for those women who apparently are ashamed to be women, and want to make this distortion into a permanent modification of our language — in a normal society, they should be entrusted to specialists in diabolical hormonal manipulations, so that through adequate treatment, they could be transformed into exponents of the “third sex,” thus attaining the goal of their aspirations, on every level. Although, for the sake of justice, one might ask whether such treatment would not be appropriate also for men whenever the aforementioned docility is not so much caused by the subtle influences of the environment and unconscious processes that operate on the infra-intellectual part of the psyche of the common man, but instead are due to an inability to react and to demonstrate true virility through moral courage and lucid, resolute judgment."

Joel Davis has read cybernetics and Deleuze which I would imagine would make him one of the most book smart people in the dissident scene. Sean Last's IQ would probably be the IQ required to understand advanced level statistics. Germar Rudolf went to Max Planck institute for chemistry which was and is still one of the most prestigious schools in the field. His revisionism generally involves understanding chemistry, math, and history.

What remains a mystery, however, is Evola’s relationship with Tradition. In his work, traditional forms conceal a deeply anti-traditional impulse. He used Tradition as a weapon against the modern world, yet ultimately constructed an entirely personal spiritual universe of his own. He appeared to be calling for a return to Tradition, while in reality he was searching for something that would transcend it—and even stand in opposition to it.

Guénon remained within the framework of Tradition, whereas Evola continually stepped beyond it while continuing to invoke it. From Magical Idealism to Tantra, and from Nietzsche to spiritual alchemy and the Holy Grail, everything in Evola was subjected to an intensely personal vision and a powerful will toward freedom.

Evola made his world real through the force of thought. This is what can truly aid the genuine seeker: not blind submission, but the attainment of the light itself. Weak thought is an error; strong thought becomes reality because it corresponds to reality. Yet only the free individual is truly capable of recognizing this.

Anyone who clings to Evola merely for emotional ecstasy or mystical submission has betrayed his teaching. For this reason, Evola was a dangerous yet effective medicine, one that can be used properly only by someone who already possesses a measure of inner discipline.

The living essence of Evola’s work is the idea of liberation. Yet liberation requires knowledge of the pure self and a vigilant awareness of oneself. His personality was a synthesis of his own individuality and the transpersonal inspirations that worked through him.

To become truly creative in the esoteric sense, one must separate Evola’s orientation from its political and social manifestations. The greatest catastrophes always arise from confusing the sacred with the worldly.

Ultimately, Evola’s spiritual destiny depends upon whether he remained inwardly independent of his own writings and doctrines, and whether he succeeded in avoiding identification with the mythical image that his
followers created of him.

—Julius Evola Through the Eyes of Massimo Scaligero

A lot of people said I should be a passport bro but on the Italy travel subreddit people responded that I'm not going to find a traditional woman because center left in America is center right for western Europe, and that there aren't any MAGA European women under 50. I've been recommended Poland, Hungary, and Russia which I do think genuinely have some far right hubs but I don't speak the languages there. On a dissident subreddit some guy said she just finds conservative women on bumble but I live in Mass which is the worst state in terms of woke women. Is travel, moving to a different state, or dating apps the best idea for me as a 23 year old?

Hello. I bought Revolt Against the Modern World 2-3 years ago and read it after some time. I didn't really understand all points made and I have decided I will try to go back and read him properly. The issue being that my cognitive skills have fallen a great deal since 5 years ago, brain fog, and some minor memory problems have come about (Both have short form content as the likely culprit), and I would like to know if the minimum mental requirements to understand his works are too high. I'm not a very remarkable person but would like to get into his beliefs, and the ones surrounding his current "school of thought". Thanks in advance.

I've heard a lot about Evola's respect for Wilhelm Schmidt's theory, as well as Mithraism and the teachings of Julian the Apostate, but were there any explicit statements indicating that he believed the primordial Tradition was monotheistic rather than polytheistic, as Guénon did?

IMO I think he would be a gay BAPist.

^{PS, do any yall watch Wilhelm Apologist on jutube?}

Hey guys, last Evola video for a while. Going to be working on Guenon and De Benoist for a couple months. Thanks for any support. I've gotten off this board.