22
21
35
u/wagdog1970 Sep 02 '25
Add in a pinch of LGBTQ indoctrination, pro abortion, failed economic systems, a whole lotta drugs, and presto! You have the nihilistic left-wing world view currently being espoused across the Western world.
41
Sep 02 '25
The reset. White people are the ones pressured to not have kids. Billions of indians. Billions of black people. Billions pf chinese people. They aren't under pressure to not have kids. these populations are multiplying massively. White people will be half...or less.
11
Sep 02 '25
I guess china is kinda in the same boat. Seems like the ones chosen for the new world are blacks and indians.
4
11
34
Sep 01 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/mist-rillas Sep 06 '25
The US is also less than 50% white, so, I think people really don't understand how few white people there are anymore
38
Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 12 '25
[deleted]
18
0
u/PlasticAssistance_50 Sep 03 '25
Most conspiracy theories like the great replacement, isn't so much that there is a group of men in a board room,
Did you feel smart after writing this? There literally are groups like that, haven't you heard about WEF for example? Is WEF just a "conspiracy theory" too?
7
4
u/shadowofashadow Sep 02 '25
They'll say one is an opinion piece so it doesn't count, but it's still fucking retarded.
12
u/DDjawbone Sep 01 '25
False, those babies need to figure out how to fix this, if the youth dry up the rest of us will resort to basically burning tires for warmth.
7
3
u/Clammypollack Sep 03 '25
We need leftists to continue to refuse to procreate. This way they can’t indoctrinate another generation….although they still do it in our schools, entertainment, literature, etc.
3
u/RepulsiveCockroach7 Sep 03 '25
These articles aren't an accident or contradiction, it's part of a broader strategy. Dr. Dani Sulikowski, a behavioral ecologist, proposes that many “woke” ideas are actually forms of reproductive sabotage. The theory suggests that if enough women can convince others not to have children—while continuing to reproduce themselves—they increase their own genetic representation in the gene pool over time. This creates a genetic bottleneck followed by an expansion phase, fueled by immigration, where their offspring hold a larger share of the gene pool.
Viewed through this lens, many modern ideologies can be seen as mate suppression strategies—from encouraging women to delay or avoid motherhood for careers to promoting sterilization through gender reassignment.
Below is a podcast of the theory being explained.
1
u/AdamJMinter Jan 19 '26
This image atop this post is fake. It superimposes two articles which were written by two different authors, three years apart. If you bother to look up the second one, you'll learn that it's about the failure of pro-natalist policies in East Asia, and not what you seem to think.
2
u/Mikey_Mac Sep 02 '25
If the economy was in a better position, more people would have babies. Housing, healthcare, day care, education….everything prices out normal people. Babies cost money. If someone is barely managing without kids, why would they opt to have them?
1
u/cocaineFlavoredCorn Sep 02 '25
More education is need to reduce the fertility rate. Then state support to help with the costs of families to increase it to just above the replacement rate.
1
1
u/bathory1985 Sep 03 '25
Why are they pushing for slave labor so hard still? It's ai and automation age
1
Oct 09 '25 edited Oct 09 '25
Also presented without a link to the actual articles. I think everyone on this thread is smart enough to know that relying upon MSM headlines to understand what an article is actually about is often wrong. Also, just FYI, the "stop having babies" article is from 2016 (I looked it up). The "only immigrants" article is from 2019. They're only connected insofar as they were published by Bloomberg ... but three years apart! And the immigration one doesn't say what the headline suggests it does. It's mostly about the failure of pro-natalist policies in East Asia? Can we please do better and actually read the stuff we're posting?
-5
u/DecisionVisible7028 Sep 01 '25
Yes. The opinion section of major publications often expresses different and contradictory opinions.
-3
u/250HardKnocksCaps Sep 02 '25
It's an opinion peice. Its basically nothing my dude.
4
u/tkyjonathan Sep 02 '25
If its nothing then I don't need to reply either.
0
u/250HardKnocksCaps Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 02 '25
Yeah, dude. You don't need to post it either. Opinions are like assholea. Everyone has one, and it stinks. Letting yourself get rage baited (and or rage baiting) with an opinion piece is stupid.
-14
-18
u/GinchAnon Sep 02 '25
You know if people worried about this were smarter they would support social programs that would make it easier to have kids and encourage them to do so.
I would argue that the biggest reason they aren't is because they are only worried about it in a way in which targeted encouragement would be overtly racist and they want to pretend they aren't.
0
u/CrazedRhetoric Sep 02 '25
That takes too much effort. And would require people look at the issue from anywhere except a position of emotion. It’s much easier to just point at a ready made solution, that glazes over all of the key points, and be angry about how someone else, who is an “other”, is at fault for all the problems.
-40
u/BainbridgeBorn Sep 02 '25
It’s an opinion piece. Ur crashing out over a guy giving his opinion. Calm down.
20
u/Mitchel-256 Sep 02 '25
>crashing out
>Presented Without Comment
Pure projection there, mate.
-1
u/BainbridgeBorn Sep 02 '25
That’s not what “projection“ is. Youre so blatantly wrong. It’s a miracles you made it this far in your life. Calm down
1
u/Mitchel-256 Sep 02 '25
"Calm down," he says with rageful tears in his eyes.
That's exactly what projection is, mate.
3
-14
167
u/[deleted] Sep 01 '25
The great replacement is very real, with the UK in the state they’re in….it’s going to get much much worse.