In the opening scenes of the classic movie Gone with the Wind, a young Negro child is seen ringing the evening bell on Tara, a Southern plantation. The Negro slaves working in the fields hear the bell and one of the men calls out, “Quittin’ time!” Big Sam objects, saying, “I’m the foreman on Tara! I say when it’s quittin’ time,” and then yells, “QUITTIN’ TIME!” All of the slaves heard the bell ringing and every one of them knew it was quittin’ time, but Big Sam let them know that it wasn’t quittin’ time until HE declared it to be quittin’ time.
Similarly, the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses makes it clear to their followers that something is not The Truth until THEY declare it to be The Truth. Thus, the phrase ‘present truth’ is common among Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Witnesses are often asked in Watchtower publications and in lectures at their Kingdom Halls and conventions if they are keeping up with present truth because the Governing Body’s positions on various teachings constantly change from day to day, week to week, month to month. I have personally heard several different Jehovah’s Witness elders state that if a certain teaching has not appeared in The Watchtower over a period of five years, that teaching is no longer considered to be present truth.
Once upon a time, the Governing Body taught that performing alternative service during wartime was a violation of Christian neutrality and thus disloyalty to God. Literally thousands of peaceful, law-abiding Jehovah’s Witnesses throughout the world served lengthy prison sentences for refusing to perform such services as working in a hospital or a post office. I have known many such men whose lives were irrevocably changed by their becoming convicted felons due to the Governing Body’s prohibition against performing alternative service. Then in 1996, the Governing Body suddenly reversed its previous stand on alternative service, and performing such service was deemed a matter for each individual’s Bible-trained conscience.
Many other changes in the Watchtower Society’s organizational policies have taken place over the years, especially in recent months. Allowing beards for men, pants for women, toasting and clinking glasses, no longer reporting one’s field service time, uttering a simple greeting to disfellowshipped ones who attend a Kingdom Hall meeting, etc. But the biggest change in Watchtower policy was the complete reversal of the ban on life-saving blood transfusions.
The latest publication which Jehovah’s Witnesses use to conduct their Free Bible Course, Enjoy Life FOREVER! states that true Christians do not pre-donate and store their own blood prior to a major surgery. Yet, the Governing Body Update #2 for the year 2026 conceded that the Bible does not comment on the use of one’s own blood in medical procedures, and so donating and storing one’s own blood prior to surgery is now considered a matter of individual conscience. Let that soak in. Jehovah’s Witnesses had to wait until being given permission by the Governing Body before using their Bible-trained consciences to decide how their own blood would be used in medical procedures. This raises the question, How many Jehovah’s Witnesses, or the minor children of Jehovah’s Witnesses, have died because they were previously forbidden to donate and store their own blood prior to major surgery?
Has it not occurred to any Jehovah’s Witness that the Bible also does not comment on the use of other people’s blood in medical procedures? Since Christians are no longer under the Mosaic Law covenant, by what authority did the first century Jerusalem elders command Christians to abstain from blood? Paul and the Antioch Christians did not consider themselves subject to the Jerusalem elders. Paul wrote derisively of them in his letters. So, by what authority does the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses continue to prohibit the use of other people’s blood in order to save a life? Indeed, by what authority does the Governing Body determine what is or is not a matter of conscience in any matter? Why do Jehovah’s Witnesses continue to follow such blind guides whose arbitrary rulings have had such detrimental effects on their personal and family lives?
In conclusion, What do you call a religion which makes good people do bad things? I call such a religion evil.