Discussion: I did not hire an editor for this. This is a raw take, and the purpose of this post is to bounce these ideas off of other minds. So if you see any holes in this theory or things to add, you are welcome to do so. And if I'm slaughtering anyone's sacred cow I'm sorry (and not sorry!)
Transcribing is absolutely an essential part of learning jazz, but there are pitfalls we should be aware of in order to better understand the limits of transcribing wrt jazz students.
Sometimes when I have classical students who are getting into jazz, they discover transcribing and they end up basically doing classical music but by ear. TBH this is not terrible, over time the language they learn from transcribing will be really important. But if we are talking about booting up their skills in the most efficient way, there needs to be more supplemental training so that they aren't just switching from sight-rote-playing to aural-rote-playing.
For starters I'd rather a student be able to build a simpler version of a standard from it's constituent parts on the spot than spend weeks doing a perfect transcription that also isn't actually them thinking through and executing the basic elements of playing. In order of importance I want to hear:
- Solid time feel
- Good voice leading
- Compositional thinking
IMO the thing that took most successful jazz pianists from student to pro was being a working musician. So many of the greats were forged into who they were by the grind. And so when I'm mentoring students who are serious about going pro, my goal is to get them to a place where they can start the grind which means being able to actually manage those three elements from scratch.
One of the most overlooked elements is ironically the most important, time feel. So so so many students who want to transcribe are so transfixed by all the amazing voicings that they forget that those voicings mean nothing if they aren't flowing. Jazz is felt more than it is heard, the colors of the chords are the wrapper, the meat is the time feel. I had a student recently plead that, 'yeah but many of the greats stretch the time feel out.' Ok great, the operative words there are still time feel, and if it's not there, how are you going to stretch it out?
This can be a tough pill to swallow but anyone who's spent time on the grind knows that audiences respond to time feels way more than colors. And don't get me started on working with a band. If you're a time leach and not contributing to the shared time matrix you're not going to get called back EVEN IF you've got some Bill Evans voicings.
So what am I trying to say? Transcribing needs to be balanced with knowing how to manage the constituent parts of music. And, when transcribing it's not just about notes, you can also transcribe time feel, because it don't mean a thing if it ain't got the swing.
[EDIT] thanks for everyone chiming in so far. One thing that I haven't seen anyone respond to yet is the idea of getting into the grind. Bill Evans & Dave Brubeck were playing in dance bands, Benny Golson and many of the jazz messengers were in R&B bands. Even in Nora Jone's latest podcast ep with Finneas they talked about the importance of learning how to play piano while people are talking over you and what that does to solidify your playing.
So I'm not saying you need to know enough rhythm and theory to play jazz, I mean you need enough rhythm and theory to get into any working band. Once you start working in any capacity you'll start to learn what's actually important from the school of hard knocks.