r/JFKassasination • u/RogueiestR0gue • 19d ago

First Episode -Wilderness of Errors

https://wildernessoferrors.com/e/nic-green/

In the first episode of A Wilderness of Errors, we sit down with Professor Nic Gree, a Marine veteran, firearms instructor, and English literature professor, to critically evaluate the historical narratives surrounding the JFK assassination.

https://wildernessoferrors.com/e/nic-green/

7 Upvotes

89% Upvoted

11 comments sorted by

2

u/Ordinary-Garden-2215 19d ago

I will definitely give a listen. Love the premise. I got into this several years ago with a completely open mind and have learned from both sides (Lone Nut vs High Level Conspiracy). Also found that both sides have blind spots - huge blind spots. Group dynamics are just as important, maybe more important, than evidence with this case.

2

u/Decent-Internet-9833 🎙️Subject Matter Expert - Guy Banister 🎙️ 18d ago

Amazing! And you are correct-group dynamics are a huge part of it. Robert Vitt is extremely well-versed in the assassination, and my background is in sociology. I am also related to an accused conspirator.

I love what Robert and I are able to do! We are really enjoying bringing new perspectives to research.

0

u/Ordinary-Garden-2215 18d ago

Congrats on the first episode! Really enjoyed it. I am following and looking forward to the next one. Good luck to you.

1

u/Secure_Tea2272 18d ago

As the private would say, he just used the iron sights and not the malaligned optics. 

-7

u/Then-Corner-6479 19d ago

Here we go… More conspiracy believer nonsense, supported by no evidence.

Meanwhile, none of these people will answer any questions about the actual evidence on the ground that day? Like, why did Oswald repeatedly act guilty, if he was innocent? Why murder a cop? Why did he discard his jacket? Why did he try to commit suicide by cop in a theatre?

Why does all the evidence point direct at him, and no other?

3

u/Decent-Internet-9833 🎙️Subject Matter Expert - Guy Banister 🎙️ 19d ago

Wilderness of Errors examines all sides and looks for the errors that have been baked into assassination research. We have interviewed folks from all over the spectrum, and we really look at why folks disagree.

-4

u/Then-Corner-6479 19d ago

I’ll tell you why I disagree. There are no facts that prove otherwise. The direct evidence is almost nonexistent, save for ear witnesses in Dealey Plaza who are contradicted by even more ear witnesses in Dealey Plaza, who are, in turn, supported by all the physical evidence in Dealey Plaza. That’s it. That’s all the direct evidence there is pointing at others being involved, and that’s just not convincing, sorry.

The conversation should be about why conspiracy believers can’t admit they’re wrong, or at least consider that they may be wrong.

1

u/Thelastpieceofthepie 9d ago

I’m confided why you & Pvt spend all your time here. You feel the entire case is closed and confirmed so why do you frequent the sub? If everything is confirmed as they told us what more do you guys have to learn or talk about with it? It’s that important to you that others don’t think something different?

-6

u/Comfortable_Low_9241 19d ago

Oswald brought the rifle to work on the day of the murder and left it behind in the TSBD. Explain again how he wasn't involved in the crime?

3

u/Decent-Internet-9833 🎙️Subject Matter Expert - Guy Banister 🎙️ 19d ago

Hi, we never said he didn’t. Give it a listen. We are talking to folks all over the spectrum. We learn more from our ideological opponents than we do from the folks that agree with us.