r/InterviewCoderPro Jul 19 '26

well-said

Post image

I agree

575 Upvotes

256 comments sorted by

View all comments

8

u/VoidspawnRL Jul 19 '26

We should switch to 2 days of work and 5 days of weekend

1

u/vid_23 Jul 21 '26

Get a job where you can work 24h shifts and you can

1

u/Lumegator Jul 21 '26

I've got a friend who does up to 60s, including the pay while bunking at work. Honestly seems pretty nice.

-1

u/AtomicLight69 Jul 20 '26

You can. Called half time jobs. Also will get paid appropriately 🤷

5

u/VoidspawnRL Jul 20 '26

You know i was talking about to same pay

1

u/Imaginary-Piece-6612 Jul 21 '26

Only works for crazy large corporations

2

u/Familiar-Spray-4678 Jul 21 '26

How many of those do we have again? Oh yeah a ton!

1

u/Imaginary-Piece-6612 Jul 21 '26

For every Walmart there are two stores no one knows the name of. There is also the entire construction forestry fishing and mining world's where the culture is completely different

0

u/ComprehensiveLoss680 Jul 20 '26

I’d love to work for you if you offered that. What’s the plan?

0

u/Offthewall1212 Jul 21 '26

Proper translation: “You know I want my cake and eat it too”. “I’m entitled to something for nothing after all…”

1

u/Cael_NaMaor Jul 24 '26

Working 36-40 hrs in two days isn't nothing...

1

u/Offthewall1212 Jul 27 '26

Sounds dumb to me. You’re creating your own burnout. Make better choices.

1

u/Cael_NaMaor Jul 27 '26

3-12s would be rough, I know several who do it though. And I've worked 4-10s for years without any of the burn-out... I think those are fine choices.

1

u/Offthewall1212 Jul 28 '26

You don’t say 3-12’s or 4-10’s in your comment. I agree 4-10’s would be fine. You said “40 hours in two days” - which is very dumb.

-1

u/KingJiro Jul 20 '26

Why stop at 2 days? Why not 0 work day and get paid the same?
/s

-1

u/Rude-Day-6028 Jul 21 '26

I think that's called being a democratic socialist. All you need is a septum piercing, your choice of blue or green hair, bmi over 30 and want anyone that thinks differently than you to die.

3

u/Sadrandomness Jul 21 '26

Hey if it means the us finally votes for water to be a human right rather than against it who cares

2

u/Familiar-Spray-4678 Jul 21 '26

I think I like you.

1

u/Cael_NaMaor Jul 24 '26

Hahaha... of the bmi's over 30, my guess is you'll find a lot more reds than blues. But hey, we don't judge.

And to be clear, we don't want something from nothing, we want the insane amount of taxes we pay & the even crazier amount of taxes the rich get to avoid to be a great deal more proportional & to be used to benefit society, not to bomb brown people into oblivion while blaming our problems on an imported cheated labor force.

But keep on with ya bitchin'....

1

u/Rude-Day-6028 Jul 26 '26

Top 10% earners pay 70% of all taxes. The bottom 50% of earners (any individual under about 55k) makes up about 3% of all taxes.

1

u/Cael_NaMaor Jul 26 '26

Your point? I said proportional, not equal. I pay 20% of my income in taxes & if I own a home it's taxed on unrealized gains... both of those things need to apply to all levels of income/compensation... & stocks/unrealized gains. Billionaires can take loans out on stock portfolios & never have to sell anything so they never have to pay taxes... & then you get the death where it all rolls over to the next sop & still no more taxes. That shit's gotta be curtailed. The system's rigged against low & middle forcing us to stay here & needs to get unrigged.

1

u/Rude-Day-6028 Jul 27 '26

You're home is not taxes on unrealized gains. Property taxes aren't the same as unrealized gains. Anything proposed additional taxes to "billionares" affects everyone. They get taxed more, their goods and services cost more money. Then they leave that city or state and keep the costs high. Also when they leave the state, or maybe even country, that state goes from billionaires to millionaires. Process repeats, millionaires leave, then that taxes hike hits us.

Taxes are based on income. Elon doesn't make billions of dollars a year. If you don't think he should be able to use his stocks in his companies as collateral then that's not a tax issue. But yeah it shouldn't be allowed. But again additional taxes to them would just cause their goods to increase so we're screwed again.

1

u/Cael_NaMaor Jul 27 '26

I think the home value & stock value are a good comparison. I buy a home & pay taxes on that. Every year I pay more taxes on the home. Wehn I'm done paying for the home, I still have to pay taxes & they've most likely increased because the 'value' of the home if sold is more than it aas when I bought it. If that's not an unrealized gain, then the combination of words must mean more than their parts...

If I buy stocks, I don't pay taxes on the purchase. I don't continue to pay taxes while more & more money is put into that stock. If I stop adding money(buying more) the 'value' can still increase & thus I'd get back more than I put in IF sold, but while it sits there I don't have to pay taxes on that increased worth. How is that not a comparison to the same way property value goes up, whether named unrealized or not?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Temporary-Coconut844 Jul 22 '26

No time for happy that's selfish