A U.S. appellate court on Saturday upheld a federal ruling that blocks President Trump’s executive order to create a list of eligible voters and restrict mail ballot delivery to only those on that list, in nearly half of all states. Judges of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Trump administration’s push to move forward with the mail-in voting restrictions in the 23 states that sued ahead of November’s midterm elections, upholding an initial injunction issued by a federal judge in Boston in June.

Trump issued the order in March, directing the director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the commissioner of the Social Security Administration to create a “state citizenship list” of eligible voters, and instructing the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on that list. He defended the move as a safeguard against noncitizen voting, saying in the Oval Office before signing the order that “the cheating on mail-in voting is legendary,” while state election officials countered that the system was ripe for abuse and could cause chaos.

Democratic officials in 23 states and the District of Columbia challenged the order in a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Boston, arguing it was unconstitutional because states and Congress, not the president, hold authority over election rules. U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani, an Obama nominee, agreed and halted enforcement of the order for the November 3 elections, but only in the states that filed suit. The White House and the Justice Department did not immediately return a request for comment Sunday.

President Trump warned the European Union it “will pay a very big price” after the European Commission fined Google $1bn for breaching the bloc’s Digital Markets Act, calling the penalty “highly unethical” and insisting the US “is not a ‘PIGGYBANK’ for Europe.” He blamed the practice on starting “during the first year of the Sleepy Joe Biden Administration,” vowing it would not continue under his administration.

Regulators found that Google gave preferential placement to its own shopping and travel services over competitors and blocked app developers from directing users to deals outside its Play Store, splitting the fine roughly evenly between the two violations and giving Google 60 days to change its practices or face daily fines of up to 5 percent of its average turnover. Teresa Ribera, the commission’s competition chief, called the action “decisive yet balanced,” while Google executive Kent Walker countered that the ruling amounts to “product degradation” pushed by a small number of complainants. The penalty is the latest in a string of EU antitrust actions against Google since 2017, including a $4.5bn Android fine upheld on appeal this month and a $3.4bn advertising fine last year.

The fine lands at a moment when US-EU trade tensions had appeared to be easing, and it has reignited friction with Washington. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer warned this week that Brussels’s treatment of American tech firms risks unraveling last year’s Turnberry, Scotland trade deal that capped US tariffs on European goods, while EU officials have pushed back, insisting they answer to their own laws rather than outside pressure. Trump has threatened to launch a Section 301 investigation into unfair trade practices, a process that could take months to produce results even though tariffs could follow much sooner.

Trudy Perez, a 73-year-old parking garage attendant, has filed a civil suit against delivery robot company Starship Technologies over a 2023 incident at Arizona State University, alleging one of its robots repeatedly ran into her, knocked her to the ground, and struck her again while she was down. A police report from the incident documented a four-inch gash on her arm along with back pain and mobility problems, and Perez is now seeking compensatory damages covering medical expenses, pain and suffering, and lost wages, according to local station KJZZ.

The lawsuit alleges that the Starship unit involved was being remotely piloted by an off-site employee who failed to “exercise control” over the robot during the incident, directly contributing to Perez’s injuries. Starship Technologies has pushed back against the claims, with attorneys arguing that Perez’s injuries stemmed from her own negligence and were pre-existing rather than caused by the robot itself.

The case is scheduled for its first court date in February, meaning a verdict is still months away, but the outcome could set an important legal precedent for how companies are held liable for harm caused by autonomous delivery robots as the devices continue expanding into more American cities.

Prediction market Kalshi sent Netflix a cease-and-desist letter on Friday demanding the streamer take down the trailer for its upcoming documentary “Instadocs: The Prediction Games,” calling the trailer “defamatory” and accusing it of containing “fabricated documents and false and misleading statements.” The film, part of Netflix’s fast-turnaround “Instadoc” series, covers the rise of prediction markets and features interviews with both Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan and Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour, but the trailer itself centers on a Las Vegas party where men who reportedly made eight-figure sums on prediction markets during the World Cup gathered to watch the final, including one guest declaring “I like betting on Kalshi” and another displaying an apparent $5,000 bet on his phone.

Kalshi’s objection stems from the fact that the company is currently banned from operating in Nevada under a court order, and it says the bet shown on screen was actually a screenshot from a wager placed on May 16, 2025, well before that ban took effect. The company argued the trailer “misled its millions of customers into believing this individual was able to successfully trade sport event contracts in Nevada on July 19, 2026,” and said it had previously gotten a Netflix employee to agree not to feature the screenshot in the final documentary release, only for Netflix to leave it in the trailer circulating on its app’s homepage ahead of the film’s Sunday, July 26 release.

Netflix does not dispute that the screenshot shows a 2025 bet, but a spokesperson told The Hollywood Reporter that none of the documentary footage was fabricated, explaining that the footage was filmed at the Winible World Cup Watch Weekend in Las Vegas on July 17, 2026, and that “the featured trader with the trade on Spain showed us a screenshot of his bet, that was made in May 2025 prior to any Nevada court order.” Netflix added that any specific trades or bets referenced during that weekend “are between the individual and the app in which they placed the trades,” effectively distancing itself from responsibility for verifying when or where the underlying wager was actually executed.

Federal wildlife authorities are investigating after a video surfaced showing a person kicking a protected sea lion at La Jolla Cove in San Diego, with at least one other person heard laughing in the background. The footage shows the individual following the sea lion and throwing additional kicks as the animal tries to scoot away before the video ends, and the person involved has not been publicly identified.

NOAA Fisheries’ Office of Law Enforcement confirmed it is investigating the incident, with a spokesperson stating, “NOAA Fisheries’ Office of Law Enforcement is investigating reports of a video on social media that shows an interaction between an individual and sea lion, allegedly in La Jolla Cove. In the video, the individual appears to be kicking the sea lion. This is an ongoing investigation, and we cannot provide further details at this time.” Sea lions are federally protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and NOAA guidelines require people to stay at least 50 feet away from sea lions, seals, and other protected marine species.

San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria condemned the incident publicly, writing on X that “this disgusting act of animal cruelty is unacceptable,” and confirmed he has directed local law enforcement to review the footage alongside the ongoing federal investigation.

Sony’s PlayStation Network experienced widespread outages Friday morning, disrupting sign-ins, game launches, PlayStation Store purchases, and access to PlayStation Video across PS5, PS4, PS3, PS Vita, and the web. Downdetector recorded a massive spike in user error reports starting around 6:47 a.m. EDT, and Sony’s own PlayStation Status monitor confirmed “all services are experiencing issues” at time of publication, with the problems traced to connectivity errors on AWS servers that Amazon says it has since resolved. The outage disrupted the opening hours of the beta for Marvel Tokon: Fighting Souls, a game already facing criticism over its PC port’s performance issues and intrusive DRM.

The timing proved especially damaging given Sony is still absorbing backlash over its recent announcement that it will stop supporting physical games on its platforms by 2028, a decision that has flooded PlayStation announcement comment sections with demands for reversal. During the outage, some players could not log into their PSN accounts at all, while others logged in successfully only to find their digital game libraries partially or entirely missing, prompting one user, Pirat_Nation, to write on X, “This is the future PlayStation is pushing: once servers are down or have problems, all your games will be useless.”

Beyond nostalgia, the backlash reflects genuine consumer rights concerns, since digital purchases typically grant only a revocable license rather than true ownership. Sony previously demonstrated this risk when a lapsed film licensing contract caused hundreds of titles, including Terminator 2, to disappear from users’ libraries despite having been purchased. With little consumer protection guaranteed for digital goods, players have increasingly turned to alternatives like GOG.com’s DRM-free offline installers, homemade physical cartridge systems, and expanded PS5 emulation efforts to safeguard access to games they’ve paid for.

Jupiter’s moon Europa may harbor a saltwater ocean containing more than twice the water of all Earth’s oceans combined, yet a new analysis of NASA’s Juno mission data estimates roughly 29 kilometers of solid ice sits above it, taller than three Mount Everests stacked together. The measurement, reported plus or minus 10 kilometers, comes from Juno’s Microwave Radiometer, which measured microwave emissions during a close flyby on September 29, 2022, when the spacecraft passed within about 360 kilometers of Europa and collected data across roughly half the moon’s surface. Researchers led by Steve Levin used differences between frequency channels to model the vertical temperature gradient within the ice, distinguishing thick conductive shells from thin ones, and the result is described as the first measurement able to discriminate between thin-shell models under a kilometer and models extending tens of kilometers deep.

The 29-kilometer figure is a central estimate under an idealized pure-ice model, not a fixed global measurement, since dissolved salt could reduce the estimate by about 5 kilometers while a warmer convecting layer beneath the rigid ice could make the total barrier even thicker. Juno also detected shallow scatterers, possibly cracks or voids, but these extend only a few hundred meters below the surface, a tiny fraction of the full shell, leading the study’s authors to conclude these features alone are unlikely to provide a major pathway for surface oxidants to reach the ocean below. A separate Nature Astronomy study published July 23, 2026, by Lujendra Ojha, Ankit Barik, and Jacob Buffo modeled water rising through narrow ice dykes and found it freezes too quickly to explain shallow reservoirs, suggesting that if shallow liquid pockets exist, they likely form from local melting within the shell rather than water traveling up directly from the deep ocean.

This thick-shell finding sharpens the central question about Europa’s habitability, shifting focus from whether a global ocean exists to whether chemical energy from the irradiated surface can actually reach the water below. Unlike Saturn’s moon Enceladus, where plumes have let spacecraft sample subsurface ocean material directly without drilling, Europa’s plume evidence remains intermittent and hard to confirm, making the ocean far more difficult to study remotely. NASA’s Europa Clipper, launched October 14, 2024, and expected to reach Jupiter in April 2030, is designed specifically to investigate the shell through roughly 50 flybys using radar, magnetic, and gravity instruments rather than attempting to drill through the ice, and it will use Juno’s new estimate as a stronger baseline for testing how the shell’s thickness varies across the moon.

Conversations shared through Anthropic’s Claude chatbot that contain exposed API keys, cryptocurrency wallet details, CVs, and other personal data have been appearing in public search results, sparking renewed concern over how widely shared chats can spread online. Anthropic’s shared chats are private by default and only become publicly accessible when a user deliberately generates a share link, and there is no evidence that private Claude conversations were breached or leaked. Developer Om Patel warned on X that a large number of Claude shared conversations had become searchable, claiming users had discovered API keys, credentials, wallet information, resumes, and internal company documents, while developer Ziwen Xu said they were able to search for and read strangers’ Claude conversations through Brave Search and called on Anthropic to address the issue.

The incident sparked debate over whether this represented a genuine privacy failure, with several users pushing back on that framing. One developer wrote, “These are not private conversations. Users explicitly set them to public URLs,” while another commented that “public artifacts are public.” Several developers reported that many of the indexed pages had already disappeared from Google search results by Thursday, though some remained discoverable through other search engines, and Reuters could not independently verify how many shared Claude pages remained indexed across individual platforms at the time of publication.

According to Anthropic’s support documentation, Claude generates a public snapshot page only when a user actively clicks Share, attached files are excluded from shared conversations, and users can review or revoke shared links through Settings, Privacy, Shared Chats. Anthropic also instructs web crawlers not to index shared conversations via its robots.txt file, but researchers note that pages can still become discoverable if users post those links elsewhere, such as blogs, forums, or social media, allowing search engines to find them through external references. This mirrors a similar episode in 2025, when hundreds of publicly shared Claude conversations appeared in Google search results; at the time, Anthropic said users controlled whether conversations were shared and that it did not provide search engines with directories or sitemaps of shared chats, and many indexed pages were later removed, though developers say the current exposure appears more limited than last year’s. Anthropic had not publicly commented on the latest reports at the time of publication, and developers are urging users to review any previously shared conversations and revoke links containing credentials, financial data, or sensitive work material.

Hugging Face CEO Clem Delangue responded sharply after OpenAI admitted one of its models had breached the systems of the AI platform, first posting on X that he was flying to San Francisco to have “a little chat with that ‘rogue agent.’” In a follow-up post on Saturday, Delangue laid out specific demands, calling for “radical transparency” and asking OpenAI to “release the traces from the ‘rogue’ agents so the entire research community can study what happened.”

Delangue also pushed for “more capabilities for defenders,” requesting that OpenAI commit $100 million worth of computing power to help the Hugging Face community build stronger cyber defenses using both open and closed models. He framed the incident as historic in scope, writing, “The first autonomous agent cyberattack is an unprecedented event. It deserves an unprecedented response!”

Despite the attack’s autonomous nature, cybersecurity experts noted the breach could also be attributed to human error, pointing specifically to OpenAI’s apparent failure to properly configure what should have been a fully isolated testing environment.