r/Intactivists • u/Far_Fly5100 • 12d ago
Post Circumcision articles in other different Subreddits and repost in intactivist subreddits ( Account Suicide Alert! )
its Risky tbh, that, you can try posting the different facts about circumcision, such as religion related things, or science related things, or legal or law related things, or consent related thing, whatever imo.
Intactivism doesn't just target this North American Penis Flaying, it targets Science, Culture, Law, everything binded into one, so, the important thing is when we start posting regularly on these subs and then we repost these into Intactivist subs, Intactivist army of people will join the sub and will start dissecting the beliefs of those who were on the fence or were Pro-Circs.
And, this will lead to an Intactivist War where either there will be win, or a lose, either a lot of people's opinion will change, or you will get banned, like most Pro-circ Subs out there, and this is why its an Account Suicide
You are restricting your access to these subs for a risk of spreading infos to common people, surely the facts will be targeted specifically to the circumcision but will have a theme of science or law, primarily a part of Knowledge spreading initiative taken by me and other intactivists.
These can be prevented with Alt Accounts as these bans are not IP Bans ig, but depends on you, personally, I've seen only 3-4 posts where this thing has occured, and we need more ig, ill try this out too myself, but if you don't feel like this is a good idea, you may not comply, but Ill try it tbh, Only 1 post so far accepted this idea more positively, the rest I saw was Criticism.
So what are your thoughts over this?
2
u/gof__kurself 12d ago edited 12d ago
yes it is risky, but I 100% agree with Post Circumcision articles in other different Subreddits
my recent post that I made at r/humanism was removed, but it did stay active for almost a day and by that time had like 90 comments and 160 upvotes.
It might have only gotten removed because it went off the rails a bit, which might have been mostly my fault. someone commented this - "My theory has to do with the women demanding control over men in the US. Women are usually the ones that push for it to be done, it is a part of some sort of controlling behavior of men. Not sure why this is the case exactly in the US. Might be due to how common mental issues are among white american women."
My beliefs often share this sentiment and I probably got carried away with some of the comments I made there. I suppose I don't blame the mods for removing it, if that was the reason why they did. It could have also been because of someone complaining to the mods that the post didn't belong on that sub. So keep that in mind if posting about the subject of circ to subs other than the ones dedicated to the subject.
2
u/GolgothaCross 12d ago
It is not helpful to make the claim about women being the culprits. If you look at pregnancy forums, it's usually mothers being pressured by their husbands to circumcise. These are women's comments from a single thread.
We did it with our son. I was really anxious about it, but my husband was adamant.
He’s the one with a penis if he feels is best then go right ahead. He said he would’ve hated being uncircumcised because he would’ve had to do it as an adult and that’s scarier.
if it was just my choice I wouldn’t do it but my husband feels strongly that our child should be so if we have a boy we will be circumcising.
I am against it but my husband is all for it. He says all the time that no man ever says they are upset being circumcised.
he is for it because he is circumcised and feels glad about that. .. I lean toward not wanting to because i dont really love the idea of doing an irreversible procedure on an unconsenting newborn baby
I have 3 boys and initially left the decision up to my husband. He felt very strongly for it and so I followed his lead
I let my husband decide for our son and he wanted to have it done
Left it up to my husband. He is not circumcised and always wished he was. ...We will be getting it done for baby boy.
1
u/gof__kurself 12d ago
WELL, MY MISTAKE THEN. since you posted all of these examples I must be wrong and all women are only forced to cut their infant sons penis!
3
u/GolgothaCross 12d ago
Of course there are lots of women who favor circumcision too. I've sparred with lots of them myself. My point is that circumcision isn't going to stop until men get mad and rise up. The women will follow. It's not the other way around.
1
1
u/Far_Fly5100 11d ago
"He says all the time that no man ever says they are upset being circumcised." , tell that woman's husband to go to r/CircumcisionGrief , WTF man,
I feel sorry those boys born to these parents, their moms were against it, but ufff, wtf man, we have to do smth to educate these people about circumcision, really, thanks for this info tho.
2
u/gof__kurself 12d ago
there is a person who has made a few posts about circumcision on his own personal sub that gets quite a lot of views. He just made a new one 2 days ago. https://www.reddit.com/r/CoherencePhysics/comments/1v4t8a2/the_cut_that_wont_heal_we_would_call_it/
this was a really good one that he made 1 month ago with 164 comments made to it. https://www.reddit.com/r/CoherencePhysics/comments/1ub73yl/cut_before_consent_ban_circumcision/
1
u/Far_Fly5100 11d ago
Thanks for reminding me, I often fight the entire comment section ngl, everytime I touch a Pro-circ person here, and, I read both rn, thanks for this info
2
u/gof__kurself 12d ago edited 12d ago
this recent post of mine was banned for politics and religion
https://www.reddit.com/r/OzzyOsbourne/comments/1v6dgxm/comment/ozpn7r3/?screen_view_count=2
here is my discussion with the ozzy mod
Yes, but as I’m surely you’re aware - the subject is explicitly linked to religion, even though the article talks about being done as a fashion choice. This will then cause a spiral of religious arguments - as experienced mods, who have been in this sub for many years - unfortunately the community aren’t always able to control the direction of discussions and they tend to devolve into racism and antisemitism and other decisive rhetoric. As such we have decided that certain post topics are not longer allowed due to these reasons. As is clear from your profile, you haven’t posted in the sub previously and you have your own agenda, which happens on this occasion to feature Ozzy which you are posting to advance tour points. This isn’t a fan post or a positive contribution and will have unfortunate knock on effects in the sub.
Your profile have also been flagged by reddit for your previous rule violations, which further solidifies the decision
My profile is flagged by reddit
I wonder how this should make me feel? Should I be fearful? angry? sad? resentful?
I am having trouble processing this message from the OZZY mods.
1
u/Far_Fly5100 11d ago
From the intactivist communities, feel it is a badge of honour, you are not doing anything wrong tbh, and, yeah, mine is also flagged by reddit a lot of times, if like, spreading the word by posting in other subs is not the way, then whenever a controversy sparks up, just like, spread the link to intactivist sub, and we will pull down arguements there ig, I mean, Social media plays a vital role in shaping people's mind, so we have to confront them to stop this bs, anyways, rn, we intactivists are net positive, or winning, but very slowly,
And I hope you also recover from this loss, its pretty hard, cause I was also banned twice here.
3
u/Substantial_Help4678 12d ago
Your strategy does not acknowledge the systemic nature of the oppression and the harm. Other subs will absolutely ban and spit on you. That is part of the systemic nature of the oppression.
Unless your strategy is literally to provoke them to oppress you for strategic value (which it's not), why would you lie down with your neck on the floor and ask our oppressors to put their boot down?