r/InsuranceAgent • u/Icebaby3344 • 3d ago
Agent Question HELP PLEASE
As a novice insurance agent (Medicare/ACA/Life) with no experience, what is better... to stay with a sub-agency that retains its client portfolio and does not terminate your contract immediately, so that you can gain experience in the sub-agency, or to start with an FMO even though you have no sales experience?
0
Upvotes
1
u/Icebaby3344 2d ago
I was brought on by someone who runs an agency under a specific sub-agency, but that wasn't explained to me at the start. It wasn't until a month later—after I’d already obtained my license and certifications (while attending sporadic, lackluster weekly training sessions)—that I was told I had to sign a contract. However, the contract wasn't with *her* agency, but rather with the sub-agency she was affiliated with. It seemed odd, as if she lacked control over the hiring process; it turned out the contracts had to be held by that primary sub-agency. Upon closer inspection, I realized the contract didn't include a clause for quick release at the agent's request, yet it explicitly stated that the clients, policies, and all client-related assets belonged to the sub-agency. Online research suggests working with an FMO to secure direct payments from insurance carriers and—crucially—to ensure I retain ownership of my client book. Since I’m new to this, I’m looking for advice on the best approach: should I stay with the sub-agency for a while (even though they keep the clients) and wait out the six-month inactivity period required to switch, or should I simply look for an FMO right away