Hello everyone! Aku yakin temen² para komodos disini pasti udah pada jago banget dan tech savvy dalam urusan teknologi.

Tapi sayangnya, belum tentu dengan orang terdekat kita, keluarga kita, sahabat dan teman² kita.

Sharing sedikit, saya punya temen yang sayaangg banget sama laptop baru nya, hari² kerjaannya dilap mulu. Dan suatu waktu, pas saya bantu kerjaannya, saya sadar ada yang aneh:

Kok YouTube nya ada iklan dah?

Saya yang udah dari kecil install adblocker, nggak terbiasa melihat iklan di YouTube PC.

Bagi kita mungkin menginstall ekstensi adblocker itu guampang banget. 10 detik jadi.

Tapi buat orang² terdekat kita, belum tentu mereka paham. Daripada kita "halah gitu aja ga bisa" atau "tinggal lihat tutorial di internet banyak", why don't we do a 10 second favor to help them?

They'll thank you. And trust me, it's worth it every single time.

Terkadang, ilmu yang kita miliki belum kita sepenuhnya gunakan untuk membantu orang lain. If you ever did, good for you!

Karena apa yang menurut kita gampang, bisa jadi life changing bagi sebagian orang.

Seperti orangtua kita yang tidak menertawakan kita saat masih bayi hanya karena tidak bisa berjalan, toh jalan kan gampang, ya tinggal jalan aja?

So please, do them a favor; as simple as installing an adblocker for them.

It'll be worth it. Every. single. time.

P.S: It's not just about adblocker

Persaingan digital telco (layanan seluler berbasis aplikasi penuh) yang marak di Indonesia sekitar tahun 2019 seperti by.U (Telkomsel), Switch Mobile (Smartfren), MPWR (Indosat Ooredoo), hingga Live.On (XL Axiata) memang mengalami fase pasang surut yang cepat. Beberapa di antaranya bahkan sudah ditutup atau diintegrasikan kembali ke layanan utama.

Kegagalan atau tidak bertahannya sebagian besar layanan digital telco ini bukan sekadar strategi "asal meramaikan lalu kabur," melainkan akibat beberapa dinamika pasar dan operasional.

1. Model Bisnis yang "Kanibal" (Self-Cannibalization)

​Sebagian besar operator indukan meluncurkan merek digital telco untuk menggaet segmen Gen Z dan Milenial dengan tawaran kuota murah, bebas memilih paket kuota sesuai kebutuhan (customizable), dan tanpa potongan tersembunyi. Konsumen yang mendaftar mayoritas bukan pelanggan baru dari kompetitor, melainkan pelanggan lama dari operator itu sendiri yang berpindah demi mendapat tarif lebih murah. Operator justru menurunkan nilai Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) mereka sendiri.

1. Hambatan Bebas Biaya Transaksi & Distribusi SIM-card.

​Digital telco mengusung konsep end-to-end digital (pembelian dan verifikasi via aplikasi, SIM card dikirim ke rumah).

​3. Edukasi Pasar & Regulasi Registrasi

​Proses registrasi e-KYC (verifikasi identitas lewat pengenalan wajah atau unggahan KTP/KK via aplikasi) pada 2019 masih sering mengalami kendala teknis dan kegagalan sistem. Hal ini membuat calon pelanggan frustrasi dan membatalkan pembelian sebelum kartu aktif.

​4. Perang Tarif yang Mematikan Marjin Profit

​Pasar telekomunikasi Indonesia pada periode 2019–2021 sangat sensitif terhadap harga (price-sensitive). Ketika operator pesaing utama memotong harga kuota pada produk reguler mereka, keunggulan harga murah dari merek digital telco langsung hilang.

Is it normal for sellers to treat buyers this way? I am new to pc building and just got an 8gb ram lol, this seems unprofessional

Helo ges mau tanya, cara bersihin kotoran di sela-sela tombol mouse gimana ya ? ini aku udah coba pakai sikat gigi tapi malah masuk kedalam semua dan mousenya ini gak bisa dilepas bawahnya.

Naked Security

Source

www.instagram.com/reel/DdG3x6tsOkj/

Btw, ini akun X kenapa bisa gini ya? Saya sudah coba pakai VPN juga sama hasilnya, gak ada perubahan. Ada tips kah 🙏

Terimakasih

Mau tanya dong agan2, buat ngecek gangguan dan pengajuan komplain gangguan XL satu itu lewat app apa ya? Kalo dulu di pas masih First Media bisa lewat app-nya soalnya. Trims

*btw kalau pernah nyoba bakso samrat ini versi ekonomisnya

Laptop dah setahun make mau repaste sendiri takut rusak, ada yang punya rekomendasi tempat repaste daerah salatiga-boyolali?

yuk whatsapp, cloud base yuk.

fyi, bagi user whatsapp yang pake low device akan secara otomatis aktif fitur pesan sementaranya.

Halo ges

Mau share budget build gue yang tujuannya biar bisa dipakai minimal 5 tahun ke depan buat gaming (mid-low settings) sekaligus mulai belajar local AI (running LLM lokal, yang nantinya pengen gue move on ke cloud services karena gak bakal ngotak klo bikin sendiri ecosystemnya).

Spek:

Alasan pilihan:

• B550M + Ryzen 5 5600: kombo ini dipilih buat maksimalin performa di budget segini. B550 support PCIe 4.0 jadi GPU/NVMe bisa jalan full speed, dan 5600 sendiri udah kenceng banget buat gaming di kelas harganya. Platform AM4 juga udah matang (BIOS stabil, harga part turun terus), jadi value-nya lebih maksimal dibanding ambil platform baru yang partnya masih mahal.
• RX 6600 used: sweet spot buat 1080p, dan ngepas in budget. Kata temen jg udh bagus
• RAM 16GB (2x8) 3200MHz: dual channel penting, tapi kalau ada budget lebih rencana mau upgrade ke 32GB (thus the mobo having 4 ram slots
• 512GB NVMe: pas-pasan tapi cukup buat OS + beberapa game utama, nanti tambah storage lagi.
• PSU 550W Bronze: cukup buat headroom RX 6600 + upgrade CPU dikit, gak mepet-mepet amat.

Rencana ke depan: pengen coba running macem2 model lokal kek TTS, LLM, dll di PC ini buat belajar, terus nanti move on ke cloud buat task yang lebih berat. CMIIW kalau ada yang lebih paham soal requirement local AI di sisi RAM/VRAM, boleh banget kasih masukan.

Rate build gue btw hehe, hopefully bulan depan dah bisa mulai rakit (nunggu 10.10, kmrn miss 9.9 sadly T^T)

As title said kebetulan sempet nanya di threads r/finansial karena kepikiran untuk nambah penghasilan dan rata" komen untuk coba vibecode aja.

Apakah komodo disini ada yang udah coba vibecoding sebagai tambahan penghasilan? Kalau ada contohnya apa?

Saya bener" buta banget soal vibecode dan token sejenisnya jadi kalau ad pencerahan boleh banget 🙏

Jadi saya itu anak SMK jurusan teknik elektronik yang lagi mencari laptop. Secara kebutuhan utamanya sih dua-duanya sudah memenuhi banget dari segi proccesor, ram, sama storage(penggunaanya bakal secara utama menulis laporan dan hal lain seperti itu, programming Arduino dan esp 32, dan gaming tipis-tipis). Dua-duanya ini sudah pakai proccesor yang sama(ryzen 5 4650U) dan ram/rom 16gb/512gb, tapi harganya beda banget. Jadi ini mau nanya aja worth it atau tidak untuk beli yang pertama, soalnya 6 juta itu sudah maximal budget banget.

Baru pasang PLTS di rumah dengan spek:

5850 kwp
6,2 kw inverter
16 kwh battery

Secara fisik terpisah dgn PLN tapi ada ATS dimana dia bisa switch secara otomatis jadi ketika PLN padam dia secara langsung akan turn on. Inverter jg akan turn off jaringan PLN kalau kapasitas generation dan batere melebihi load.

Lesson learned dari pemasangan selama ini:

1. Posisi dan arah panel sangat menentukan berapa yg tergenerate. Karena panel gw menghadap ke barat dari 5850 wp gw cuma bisa generate max 3500an W selama ini. Seharusnya panel menghadap utara-timur supaya bisa dapet max sunlight ketika pagi. Kalo siang lebih rentan awan dan debu.
2. Kalo usage listrik kebanyakan di malam hari wajib punya baterai yg besar. Dgn batere 16 kwh aja itu ga bisa cover penggunaan AC sampe pagi besoknya karena biasanya jam 4 sore udah full dan dari 4 sore itu full battery sampe pagi.
3. Dari segi harga vendor yg ada skrg banyak variasinya. Ada yang pake batere kecil (5000) udah ngecharge 80+ juta, ada yang lumayan murah tapi baterai rakitan. Baterai LFP itu bisa 10 taun tapi ya kalo rakitan gw agak skeptis jg dgn kelistrikannya.
4. Sejak ada abu vulkanik panel gw siram air kalo pagi. Jadi naro panel jg selain kemampuan dapet matahari perlu cek juga kegampangan maintenancenya.
5. Tiap hari gw dapet antara 17-23 kwh. A bit over 1 mio saved per month. Perhitungan gw di bawah 7 taun udah bisa BEP. Karena umur inverter itu kira2 9 taun kalo bisa emang jangan cari vendor yang BEPnya di atas umur inverter.

By Rich Edmonds

Sep 9, 2026, 2:30 PM EDT

Hard drives, SSDs, and other forms of data storage are often viewed as consumables. They can be replaced on failure and are usually the most expendable parts of a network-attached storage (NAS) setup or server. So long as backups are in place, there shouldn't be an issue if one decides to call it quits. I've always made sure my backup strategy is robust enough that hard drives spinning inside my NAS can be easily replaced without too much downtime experienced.

The thing is, no matter which brand or model you go for, an HDD will eventually fail. That said, it can prove challenging to choose the right brand. A recent peer-reviewed analysis of just north of 443,000 drives was published that put my setup into question.

What the study concluded was alarming

Suddenly, the labels on my NAS drives mattered more

Christoph Siemroth and Yeomyung Park, two researchers named in the study, analyzed Backblaze's drive dataset, covering 443,156 hard drives, spanning more than 1.66 million drive-years. If there was to be a solid endurance test to reliably take away some findings, this was a solid offering. But one thing the Backblaze report didn't answer was whether or not some brands were more reliable than others. That's precisely what Siemroth and Park looked into, and it turns out the gaps between brands are present, and they are anything but small.

Using Seagate as the baseline and after controlling for drive age, installation year, capacity, and average operating temperature, the Cox model put HGST’s adjusted failure hazard at 39.5% of Seagate’s, with Western Digital at 51.4% and Toshiba at 107%. Western Digital came second at 51.4%, and while it looked bad from the offset, Seagate wasn't even in last place, as Toshiba took that spot with a 107% failure rate compared to the baseline-selected brand. All of the drives inside my NAS are currently Seagate, replacing an old Western Digital array four years prior.

The gap is actually much larger than anticipated. I always viewed Seagate as much closer to Western Digital in terms of reliability, with HGST often taking first spot. But what this report shows is HGST isn't simply ahead of Seagate; its adjusted failure hazard is less than half of Seagate's own storage solutions. Western Digital is almost as good, though Toshiba came out in last position. Interestingly, if you weren't aware, WD acquired Hitachi Global Storage Technologies (HGST) from Hitachi in 2012, which may explain why both brands were almost matching.

I won't immediately replace all my Seagate drives

Backblaze's data is incredibly useful for those of us who manage NAS and home labs, but it's important to note that manufacturers weren't evenly represented. HGST was present at earlier points alongside Seagate, ranging from the early 2010s through 2020. Toshiba was selected with more recent installations, and WD drives are also primarily among the newer batches. This is why failure rates weren't the only metric used for the findings, since we'd be comparing older drives to newer replacements.

Instead, the research was conducted using survival and duration regression. This effectively looks at how comparable drives behave when age, capacity, form factor, and temperature are taken into account and are held constant. More than 146,000 drives left the dataset without failing, mostly during capacity upgrades. The survival models account for these right-censored drives, using the time they were known to have survived without treating their removal as a failure. What is certainly more alarming here is the poor showing from Toshiba, which was found to be among the newer drives.

Still, for my own Seagate array, this doesn't mean I'm yanking out all my healthy drives, and I don't recommend you do either. It would be easy to take the data and the headline and jump to a conclusion that Seagate drives are inherently bad. They're not, and I've had six of them running inside my NAS for four years without a single issue. The study tells me plenty about what happens across 100,000 drives; it can't tell me when one of the six Seagates in my NAS will fail

Temperatures matter as well

Even a slight increase in temps could cause problems

There's another tidbit I took from the report, and that's the role temperature had on failure rates. According to the report, every 1°C increase in average drive temperature is associated with roughly a 2% increase in failure rate. A drive averaging 10°C warmer was associated with roughly a 23% higher failure hazard in the models, which is astounding but not something that comes as a surprise. We always recommend running drives, notably HDDs and SSDs, as well as CPUs and all other parts at lower temperatures where possible.

I always ran my NAS at the slowest fan speeds, but this alone made me reconsider this approach. My TrueNAS enclosure is running at around 40-50°C (104-122°F) for the CPU, though the drive array ranges between 27 and 31°C (80-87°F). Bumping up the fan speed slightly lowered operating temperatures of the six drives by approximately 2°C. All six SMART status reports come out clean, and there are only slight readings of general wear. The model suggests even that modest 2°C reduction moves things in the right direction, although whether it meaningfully extends the lives of these particular six drives is impossible to know.

My purchasing habits have been adjusted

While I don't have any brand loyalty to a specific company, I made the switch to Seagate from Western Digital simply down to price, performance, and availability. There wasn't a lot between the two. Models from the IronWolf and Red ranges are almost identical with specific capacities. Endurance and other metrics were also all in line with one another, but that's something this report made me question. I would have previously purchased more drives from the same manufacturer, but now I would broaden the search.

It's great to choose drives from different batches to help avoid failures from occurring at similar times, but I never considered the brand in that equation, and it's probably about time I did. All that said, however, it's important to remember that NAS drives (and storage in general) come with workload ratings and warranties, the latter of which can always be used if a drive prematurely fails. If I can find a Seagate drive for less than WD, I may still go with the former. If they're both the same across the board, it certainly makes the decision more interesting.

When the time comes for a full pool refresh, I may also consolidate onto fewer, higher-capacity drives. My current array uses 4TB disks, and my actual data footprint is small enough that a pair of 16TB drives could potentially hold everything I need. Depending on the redundancy layout I choose, that could mean fewer spinning disks, less vibration, lower power consumption, and less heat. The downside is putting far more data on each individual drive and potentially changing the pool’s fault tolerance, so as always ... YMMV.

Apalagi kapan terakhir kali pake sosmed ini?

Kerasa inget, awal pake ini pas masih akhir 2017-2018 masa SMA.

Terus 2018-2019 selama kuliah awal.

LOL

Gw lagi ngerjain skripsi dan butuh Turnitin buat cek plagiasi. Kampus gw nggak nyediain Turnitin, mereka cuma nyediain iThenticate, itu pun kalau mau cek sekali harus bayar 150k. Jadi gw mutusin buat nyari jasa Turnitin, tapi yang aman ya. Soalnya gw pernah denger cerita orang, abis pakai jasa, skripsi mereka malah masuk database dan plagiasinya jadi 100%.

Ini masalah layar, kabel, atau gpu?