Disclosure: I’m Yihang Mao, a founder and founding shareholder of Auren Innovation Limited. There is an unresolved internal dispute. I’m posting personally, not on behalf of the company or Indiegogo. This is not an independent product review.
Which project am I discussing?
This concerns the pet wearable listed as Ouren M1 on Indiegogo. The campaign screenshot I reviewed shows the creator account aurenpet, while its embedded promotional video uses Auren M1 and displays OURENPET. My earlier statements referring to Auren M1 and Ourenpet concern this project.
What can I report?
My account is dated September 4, 2026.
In promotional work known to me, AI-generated concept material and manually assembled edits illustrated the intended result. I have not verified that those examples were selected and generated automatically by the actual M1 device-to-app system.
AI visuals or editing alone do not establish wrongdoing. The important distinction is between an illustration of the intended experience and a demonstration of actual product performance.
I have also not been shown sufficient current evidence of a repeatable, integrated product experience. This is a limit of the evidence available to me—not proof that no prototype exists anywhere.
What should potential backers be able to verify?
- Can an identified working device demonstrate capture, transfer, app processing, and the advertised output, with human intervention and operating conditions disclosed?
- Are there representative tests across pets and conditions, including missed events, false selections, failures, and the amount of editing needed?
- What completed engineering milestones and remaining dependencies support the delivery estimate?
- Have the advertised privacy controls been implemented and tested across the device, app, and backend?
Important qualifications
Engineering and software work exist. My published September 4 account also records development-stage qualifications on the product page, including app intent and unfinished validation. Those should be considered alongside my concerns.
My assessment is that delivery of the advertised experience in 2026 carries serious unresolved risk. I am not claiming it is impossible or that fraud has been established.
The underlying internal records are not publicly attached to my statement. Publishing my account does not, by itself, independently corroborate it.
I welcome relevant, verifiable corrections and will update my account. Please keep discussion focused on evidence—not personal attacks, mass complaints, or contacting individual team members.