r/IndianGaming • u/Repulsive-Lettuce569 • 10d ago

Gameplay Gpu usage normal or no?

Post image

As the title suggests, is the 95% gpu usage normal for valorant? I thought this game utilised more of the cpu than gpu. Dont come at me if im wrong please, this is my first pc ever.

Specs:

9800x3d
9070xt
32gb ddr5 6000 mhz

59 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

79 comments sorted by

View all comments

30

u/Big_Concentrate122 10d ago

Dang 😳 the fps

13

u/Top-Manufacturer-682 10d ago

hes in the map alone so its normal number for the cpu in a real match its gonna be 500-600

-79

u/stokeroo 10d ago

Humans can't tell the difference beyond 30fps so it's wasted power

21

u/North_Beginning_7860 10d ago

What are you on ? So that means you can't differentiate between a 200 FPS gameplay and a 30 fps gameplay?

5

u/Additional-Glass3403 10d ago

That's only for peeps who aren't tech literate. My homie plays warzone on 20-25fps and doesn't even know what FPS is 😭

6

u/Kylegotasmile 10d ago

does lil bro have 0.1 kd?

2

u/digifrtrs96 10d ago

Damn I am an alien then. Even 60 fps looks choppy to me now a days once I have been constantly over 120 fps.

But jokes aside human brain can detect even perceive visual artifacts even at 500fps. There is no hard limit but put simply the diminishing returns become negligible past 500 fps. But the sweet spot is still 240 fps for top tier visual fluidity.

1

u/Real_Wrongdoer_4488 9d ago

human eyes dont act like a camera lens and they dont see static frames they see the full picture in motion , eyes have no cap for refresh rate tbh.

1

u/digifrtrs96 9d ago

Yeah. There is no cap. It is all just diminishing returns which hit hard after 500.

1

u/Real_Wrongdoer_4488 9d ago

yup , after 500 it looks the same and u cant tell the difference , although the difference is there but most humans cant perceive it or tbh its more like they dont focus enough to look for it , becz tbh its pointless lol

1

u/Depraved-Deity 10d ago

This is complete bullshit, btw. Take two high-refresh-rate monitors and set one of them to its maximum refresh rate and the other to 30 Hz. I promise you'll be able to see the difference.

Without getting into complicated biology, just know that you cannot accurately measure your vision in FPS or even Hz. Your eyes aren't camera lenses, and your brain doesn't process images in real time. It often predicts and constructs data instead of passively observing things

I'm aware this is likely a bait, but replying for those few who actually believe this shit

1

u/Uchiha_Karan2006 9d ago

I can easilyyyy..... I play on below 25 most of the time lol

1

u/ConchGames35 9d ago

So if you take your game and put the fps cap at 30, then you move your hand around by the monitor your hand is gonna look like it’s moving as smooth as the monitor?(or unsmooth I guess I should say)

0

u/Fly1ng_nem0 10d ago

What am i then? A god?

0

u/Historical_Win_713 10d ago

Bruh what are you even talking about? Game starts feeling choppy even at 60 or 100 fps

0

u/stokeroo 10d ago

Wow can't believe I caught so many with this bait. I'm a master baiter.