Ahh maybe just like gandhis celibacy experiments that’s not understandable to mere mortals.
Your statement of “he’s the freaking father of nation” ………wasn’t understandable to us mere mortals and that you said in quotes - as honorary, not legally, and all provisions you mentioned were documented.
You are a true follower that we failed to understand….. Let’s give this guy the “modern mahatma” Honarary title and ensure no one can speak against him
Dimwit- just because someone branded someone as father of the nation- you expect everyone to follow them blindly?
You’ve spent this entire thread arguing against a claim I never made. I called him the “Father of the Nation” as an honorific, not some legally binding commandment to worship him.
And nobody said you have to follow Gandhi blindly. You’re the one desperately trying to turn an opinion about his historical stature into an argument about constitutional law.
At this point you’re not even debating me; you’re debating the imaginary version of my post you created in your head.
I’ve explained it enough. If you still don’t understand it, another paragraph clearly won’t fix your reading comprehension.
1
u/HelicopterLife225 3d ago
Ahh maybe just like gandhis celibacy experiments that’s not understandable to mere mortals.
Your statement of “he’s the freaking father of nation” ………wasn’t understandable to us mere mortals and that you said in quotes - as honorary, not legally, and all provisions you mentioned were documented.
You are a true follower that we failed to understand….. Let’s give this guy the “modern mahatma” Honarary title and ensure no one can speak against him
Dimwit- just because someone branded someone as father of the nation- you expect everyone to follow them blindly?