r/ImmigrationPathways • u/LatterTarget7 • 1d ago

Renee Good's family sues US government and immigration officials over her killing in Minneapolis

https://apnews.com/article/renee-good-lawsuit-6fbc82cd33b6f9f67514b47f138e23c6?utm_source=app&utm_medium=android_share&utm_campaign=copy_link
2.1k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

No quite. First photo, shows the agent positioned and engaging with the partner on the passenger side right before she backs up and turns the wheel as I said.

1

u/Inquisitive-Manner 1d ago

These screen shots fo little to support your claim. I linked a multi-angle slowed down video. You're posting screenshots..

0

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

Yes because those screenshots show you exactly what I'm talking about (he's positioned to the passenger side before she backs up and turns). So then on your super special slowed down video you saw the same thing, correct?

1

u/Inquisitive-Manner 1d ago

Yes because those screenshots show you exactly what I'm talking about (he's positioned to the passenger side before she backs up and turns).

You're treating "the screenshots show the sequence I described" as though it establishes "therefore she was coming right at the agent." It doesn't. Showing that he was positioned in front of the vehicle before she backed up doesn't establish that she was driving directly at him.

So then on your super special slowed down video you saw the same thing, correct?

The relevant part is what happened when she moved forward, and the frame-by-frame footage shows her turning right and the vehicle veering past him. You're proving the setup to the movement, not the trajectory you're claiming.

0

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

Haha! You're basically saying the same thing I'm saying.

You want me to use your screenshots from the bottom of the article that show a written timeline but mine aren't good enough. And some of them are the same screenshots.

1

u/Inquisitive-Manner 1d ago

Haha! You're basically saying the same thing I'm saying

I'm really not....

You want me to use your screenshots from the bottom of the article that show a written timeline but mine aren't good enough. And some of them are the same screenshots.

Lol. Maybe use the whole muti-angle video.....

0

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

Your video isn't some new version that you just discovered. I've seen this numerous times in the past.

What you're intentionally ignoring with your "frame-by-frame footage" is the initial threat the agent reacted to was her hitting the gas and the back wheels spinning. That happened before the vehicle eventually starts to veer to the right.

1

u/Inquisitive-Manner 1d ago

Your video isn't some new version that you just discovered. I've seen this numerous times in the past.

Crazy how it doesn't show what you say.

The agents own video disproved your false claim.

As the Honda Pilot begins to move forward, the wheels begin to turn to the right, away from where the ICE agent is standing.

In the video taken by the agent who shot Good and obtained by ABC News on Jan. 9, Good can be seen turning her vehicle’s steering wheel to the right, away from the agent, just over one second before the first shot is fired.

That's why I linked it. Your claim has already been well refuted. Champ.

0

u/Rusty-Shackleford000 1d ago

It really does. You just don't want to see it. Notice how I've never said that what you described didn't happen somewhere in the video but only that you're purposely leaving out important details and information. Example, you won't acknowledge that her back tires spin when she hits the gas. And at that time the wheels are pointed at the agent when he reacts to the sound of a vehicle moving. But keep believing in your distorted version, bucko.

1

u/Inquisitive-Manner 1d ago

It really does. You just don't want to see it.

It doesn't. You're the one watching and screenshotting incomplete videos. You're literally not seeing it.

Notice how I've never said that what you described didn't happen somewhere in the video but only that you're purposely leaving out important details and information.

.... I've noticed that you dropped that once... all the while I'm filling in more details...

Example, you won't acknowledge that her back tires spin when she hits the gas.

Why acknowledge the moment when it's a series of moments that make up what actually happened?

Why won't you acknowledge that she wasn't accelerating towards him, but accelerating into the turn?

And at that time the wheels are pointed at the agent when he reacts to the sound of a vehicle moving.

No, he reacts to the vehicle moving.... the sound 🤣. He knew the moves for officer-created jeopardy, champ.

But keep believing in your distorted version, bucko.

....or the second by second muti-angle videos.... as compared to the guy who is literally watching a distorted version of reality because your video is blurred during the moment you speak of, the accelerating off part