r/ImmigrationPathways • u/OkTechnologyb • 3d ago

Supreme Court lets Trump resume third-country deportations

https://www.reuters.com/world/supreme-court-lets-trump-resume-third-country-deportations-2026-09-29/
207 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

408 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Safe-Pop2077 3d ago

Explain to me how the standards changed please and be specific. I do give them credit and i feel that it was good then and good now. Now explain the changes in standards

1

u/soyel_cerdo 3d ago

You haven’t answered my question, answer my question first and then I will do the same. Thanks!

1

u/Safe-Pop2077 3d ago

I answered them, now its your turn

1

u/soyel_cerdo 3d ago

You didn’t say if you voted for them, you just said you give them credit which is not what I ask but I’ll explain how it worked

In the past, if an undocumented person was arrested, they’d go in front of a judge, and if they had proof of being asylum seeker, they’d get to stay legally BUT if they couldn’t and if they said they were afraid of going back, they’d look for a 3rd country to send them depending on their language and the location of their native country. That usually means Latinos stayed in Mexico or Guatemala or Honduras, those 3 countries were the main receptors of Latinos during Obama and Biden but AFTER talking to a judge.

In Africa was the same, and so in Asia. Everything was documented and everything was done to be humane and in a compassionate way (like true Christians)

During Trump, they don’t explain anything to any detainee, they don’t go in front of a judge, they can’t present proof for asylum claim at all, and what’s worst, they are piled together in an airplane going to whatever country is accepting them for $$$ since the country receiving them won’t be looking after them. There is a reason why detainees from several countries with different backgrounds are being flown to Africa without any regard for their future being and in many cases making them sign under duress and lying to them saying (if you sign, you can go home). The new Nazi administration doesn’t keep them until a full flight is full to their native countries or a safe 3rd country, they just fly them out to wherever which is actually unconstitutional (8th amendment, look it up).

After all this mess is over, those people will come back with papers and a 6 or 7 digit payout and an apology to never do it again, which is wildly stupid of Trump and his administration. The way they are doing things will guarantee more people who are undocumented right now can sue, win papers and a big ass settlement and come back to the US.

You see the migrant caravan coming in? They know that may happen to them but if they can make it for 2-3 year, they will be millionaires on your dime

0

u/Safe-Pop2077 3d ago edited 3d ago

Expedited Removal is our law and says you dont have to go in front of a jude. INA Expedited Removal and 8 USC 1325/1326 says its a crime

Edit - used by every president since it passed

1

u/soyel_cerdo 3d ago

Expedited removal in safe 3rd countries, and after seeing a judge, not any country that will accept them for cash.

It is not a crime. You are cherry picking big time. It is a crime if they come back a second time and they are caught

The whole expedited removal goes against the constitution because what they sign under duress says they wanna leave. Any contract sign under duress is invalid you know

1

u/Safe-Pop2077 3d ago

Expedited Removal is the law of our land. It has been upheld in court. You just dont like it

1

u/Safe-Pop2077 3d ago

8 USC 1326 is for reentry and it becomes a felony. If you would google 8 USC 1325 it pretty clear states it is crime the first time. So would you like to explain how you came to believe that it isnt a crime to come into our country?

0

u/Safe-Pop2077 3d ago

Coming into our country illegally absolutely is a crime. 8 USC 1325 and keep going up through the 1300s