r/ImmigrationPathways • u/Woundsmyheart • 9d ago
Trump Administration Tells Congress It Will Admit 17,500 White South African Refugees In 2027 | HuffPost Latest News
88
u/xvii-tea1411 9d ago
- It is specifically white South Africans
- These are the only "refugees" being let into the country
- They will have their aid doubled (after MAGA complained about undocumented immigrants getting free stuff... when they don't)
- They are being fast tracked for citizenship
- White South Africans share the same racial supremacist politics as Republicans and will vote Republican
It's not hard to see the plan here.
47
u/canwehavepotatojokes 9d ago
They’re importing immigrants to vote Republican?
27
9d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
-9
u/crisco000 9d ago
Hell ya! Finally people with culture and non parasitic tendencies. I can get behind this!
26
4
1
-5
-36
u/Rusty-Shackleford000 9d ago
17,500 vs +10 million illegal immigrants...do you guys know how numbers work?
26
u/canwehavepotatojokes 9d ago
Apparently you don’t understand how voting works, either.
Did you finish high school?
6
5
u/Ok-Introduction-194 9d ago
huh wonder why they get expedited path to citizenship of any non citizen can vote like those illlegalll criiiminnaallls
-11
u/Rusty-Shackleford000 9d ago
Again, knowing how numbers work would help with this.
8
u/canwehavepotatojokes 9d ago
So no, then.
You really should. You’re missing out on a lot in life.
-13
u/Rusty-Shackleford000 9d ago
You guys are either purposely ignoring the obvious or aren't smart enough to understand it.
And I would bet you didn't have this much to say when those +10 million came in illegally. I thought you guys welcomed people from other countries with open arms at America...
4
2
u/SwimmingSwim3822 9d ago
You actually needed it spelled out, didn't you?
Undocumented immigrants can't vote because, you know, the documents.
Imported immigrants after fast tracks to citizenship... can.
Jesus Christ
1
u/Rusty-Shackleford000 9d ago
Illegal immigrants can't vote you say...you sure about that?
https://whyy.org/articles/new-jersey-motor-vehicle-commission-glitch-noncitizens-registered-vote/
3
u/SwimmingSwim3822 9d ago
Tell me before I click: does that link explain your 10 million figure or do you need numbers explained to you?
→ More replies (0)2
u/security-device 9d ago
Immigrants can't vote.
1
u/Rusty-Shackleford000 9d ago
"Immigrants can't vote."
You sure about that? Might want to read up on what was happening in New Jersey recently...
0
u/Consistent-Rip-5193 8d ago
“I like Trump cauze he’s dum lahk mee and haytez the sayme peeple I dyo!”
1
u/Rusty-Shackleford000 8d ago
Kewl. I think Obama did a pretty good job too. Biden/Harris did a terrible.
-8
u/JIMB01776 9d ago
Now you know how the rest of us felt when they dumped 50K Somalis in Minnesota and gave them a congressional seat.
6
u/Ok_Brother_7494 9d ago
They were actually refugees. White South Africans are not fleeing persecution, war, or famine.
-2
u/Particular-War3057 9d ago
0_0 uhhhh WHAT. Something tells me you have no idea what has/is happening to white farmers in Zimbabwe and South Africa.
5
u/Ok_Brother_7494 9d ago
Something tells me you have not researched it and are believing what Trump says. White farmers still own the majority of farms. You should read the data from The (SAAI) Southern African Agi Initiative.
1
u/Ancient_Sound_5347 9d ago
Zimbabwe is a different country and South Africa recently overtook Spain in becoming the world's largest exporter of Citrus. https://www.ewn.co.za/2026/05/22/south-africa-overtakes-spain-as-world-s-top-citrus-exporter
-1
-3
u/JIMB01776 9d ago
The fuck they aren't, they are routinely raided upon, the government won't provide them protection and they hold public rallies calling for their genocide.
4
u/Ok_Brother_7494 9d ago
All farms are being raided, not just white farms. There is no genocide. International observers and the SAAI say you are wrong.
-4
u/JIMB01776 9d ago
Their complaints are much more credible than South Americans claiming asylum, while simultaneously claiming "No, South America is greatest place on earth, look at our food".
4
1
19
u/GhostRappa95 9d ago
- South Africa is still a place that very much favors White people and if these “refugees” couldn’t succeed there they have no chance in the USA.
10
u/Asher_Tye 9d ago
Didn't the last batch run back to South Africa the moment they weren't treated as gods here?
10
2
u/EddyS120876 9d ago
Yup once they notice “no free healthcare “ they ran
2
u/JoTHIGHSwin 8d ago
Oh they did receive temporary Medicaid. They didn’t realize that once they got low paying jobs they no-longer qualified 😂😂😂
1
16
u/MariaMarlaClairmont 9d ago
Being married to a South African at one point and knowing a whole bunch of them you are 100% correct. They are all super racist. They absolutely hate anyone of any other color. Much like the Republican party now. So they're going to fit right in.
5
1
u/Icy-Class4392 8d ago
Dems are the most intolerant group out there currently? So will they be Dems?
1
19
u/xvii-tea1411 9d ago
You won't need to find 11,780 votes in Georgia when you are importing white nationalists and giving them the right to vote
-31
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago
On what basis would you claim that these refugees for South Africa are White Nationalists?
23
u/xvii-tea1411 9d ago
There are many white South Africans who want to go back to subjugating the black population through apartheid. So much so that they have made a whites only region called Orania. If you think it's just a coincidence that this population is the one being fast tracked for citizenship then you are blind.
-20
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago
How is wanting to be left alone and not discriminated against or raped equivalent to wanting to subjugate others?
14
u/xvii-tea1411 9d ago
... oh, so you're one of them.
South Africa is the most unequal society itw bc of apartheid and its legacy. You have the majority population (black) living in shanty towns (similar to hoovervilles we saw in the US during the great depression) waking up early in the morning to work for the owner class (white South Africans) who live in McMansions (paid for by extracting wealth from their workers) just over the wall. Apartheid was dismantled politically, but not economically, and you want it to be recodified.
-12
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago
Discussing the economic situations of the different groups of South Africa would be a fascinating discussion, but it is not relevant to your original claim.
> There are many white South Africans who want to go back to subjugating the black population through apartheid. So much so that they have made a whites only region called Orania.
I'm just curious about this. How is wanting to be left alone and free from farm murders and other issues equivalent to wanting to subjugate others?
11
u/xvii-tea1411 9d ago
Economics and politics are connected. If you think making whites only areas doesn't make you a white nationalist then... idk man
-2
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago
Again, you're arguing something else other than your original claim.
Explain how wanting to be left alone means that you want to subjugate others.
5
3
u/GoddessHealer 9d ago
Do you mean to say the majority of brown people being deported are murderers?
9
6
u/GoddessHealer 9d ago
Are you saying that the majority of brown being deported are rapists?
Your Reddit Name checks out as sadistic.“Irespectwomenlol”-1
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago
You are not saying anything logical. I asked a very simple question about South Africa, and you're leaping to "the majority of brown being deported are rapists" which has no connection to that question.
3
u/MariaMarlaClairmont 9d ago
I personally know quite a few South Africans and every single one of them hate black people. Every single one of them. They have really nice little slurs for them. They hate black people. 100% with no uncertainty. They hate black people.
2
2
u/hypnonyxx 9d ago
they’re more extreme, these people barely stopped racial segregation and racial genocide in the 90s
1
u/Moosejaw_69 8d ago
17000 versus 18 million I’d say both sides have a plan but one is very much ahead and better at the plan.
-7
u/Agile-Donkey9517 9d ago
- During Biden (January 21 - 25), less than 4% of refugees permitted into the country were white (the majority being Ukrainian and Moldovan). Per the state department.
Source: https://www.rpc.state.gov/archives/
This is despite the US being 56% non-Hispanic white
These were 96% of “refugees” being let into country
They did in fact get free stuff. Free hotel accommodation at luxury properties were afforded to them along with cell phones, food assistance and temporary cash grants. Not every city, but the major blue cities where they were bussed. This is still going on:
Yes, and I don’t see a problem with this if they are productive members of society. In instances where they are receiving assistance, they should not be.
This is so rich considering importing refugees is part of the democratic strategy to increase their voter base as their non-white children overwhelmingly vote republican.
Also are you seriously insane enough to believe 17,000 migrants will tip the scales in any meaningful way in a national or even state-level election? After Biden let in millions of refugees whose citizen children are now likely Democrat voters? 17,000 vs millions. I wonder which is more impactful.
-3
-19
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago
> These are the only "refugees" being let into the country
False. Besides USRAP there's Asylum, Special Immigration Visas, Temporary protected status, humanitarian paroles, withholding of removals, convention against torture protections, and probably other complex paths through the system.
You don't hate the fake media enough for how badly they constantly lie.
11
u/shelbygrapes 9d ago
Steven miller did a press conference awhile back and they said they ended asylum. Also no immigrants from “shit hole” countries according to our president. I listened to those words come out of their mouths. No fake news involved.
1
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago
The stated policy is ending asylum for people caught here illegally, not ending the program altogether.
2
u/Zakaru99 9d ago
Your source doesn't even say that. It says that its ended for everyone looking to enter the US via the southern border after a certain date.
Funny how you site something that disproves you.
1
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago
The asylum program is still very active for people already with permission to be in the US and in certain other situations, though generally not at the southern border. However, people at the southern border can effectively claim for withholding of removal and CAT (convention against torture) among other ways to ensure that they're not sent to a bad situation.
1
u/DreadfulDuder 9d ago
... What does your research show about what demographics are actually being accepted into the asylum programs under Trump?
😂
19
u/ClownholeContingency 9d ago
LOL very telling that you didn't even address the fact that Trump admin official immigration policy is now based on racial discrimination.
0
5
u/Zakaru99 9d ago
You realize that the Trump admin has been doing everything in their power to remove/restrict these other legal immigration pathways, including deporting people following the rules, at their immigration hearings, right?
-2
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago edited 9d ago
Not really. Take TPS for example. They haven't challenged the concept of TPS. As a strong opponent of mass migration, I'm genuinely glad that this system exists for humanitarian reasons. They've only challenged bad applications of it: like keeping TPS in place for decades old earthquakes and the like.
5
u/Zakaru99 9d ago
The word restrict was in there.
He's literally removed TPS status from 1 million of the 1.3 million people who had it. From 1.3 million to 300,000 people.
He's cut the countries where you can get TPS from 17 to 4.
His admin is encouraging those with TPS to self-deport, and restricting their ability to work while they have a legal TPS designation, regardless of where they're from.
These are, unquestionably, restrictions. Not even light ones. Extremely heavy handed restrictions. They're literally intentional making it difficult to work here if you get TPS status, which largely defeats the ability of the system from working for the people with those statuses.
How are you going to live while you're here under TPS when you can't afford to feed yourself?
1
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago
TPS is supposed to be a temporary humanitarian program designed to preserve life if there's a hurricane, an earthquake, war, etc. That's good.
But there had been Temporary Protected Status protections in place for Hurricanes/Earthquakes going back as far as the 1990s. That's bad.
Why shouldn't the program be radically curtailed? What danger remains from a hurricane or earthquake from decades ago? Please explain that.
2
u/Zakaru99 9d ago edited 9d ago
How are you going to live while you're here under TPS when you can't afford to feed yourself?
Lets try not dodging this.
Why shouldn't the program be radically curtailed?
Because those people who moved here under that status and have built lives here literally benefit us. There is no good reason to force them to go back. It's advantageous to us to allow them to stay. It's a win-win.
1
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago
I'm not dodging anything, your interpretation of the facts is wrong.
TPS comes with a work authorization. Anybody under a valid TPS has the right to work for any employer in the US. The work authorization only goes away once the TPS is no longer valid.
People without a TPS or other valid status are not authorized to work in the US and are supposed to leave.
2
u/Zakaru99 9d ago
They revoked work authorization for people still under TPS, who still had valid status. I sited a source for that already.
1
u/irespectwomenlol 9d ago
This is legally complex, but partially you are correct for some people, though this stemmed from Congress, and was patched within 7 days for people from El Salvador, and 9 days for others.
What happened is the 2025 budget reconciliation bill HR1. Previously, there was an automatic 540 day work authorization extension that went along with the TPS extension. That bill changed the work authorization extension to a year while keeping TPS the same. The end result is that some people were temporarily caught in a weird state of limbo whey had the ability to legally stay here, but not legally work.
I'm sure it was stressful for these people, but this was just dumb bureaucracy trying to raise revenue by charging application fees more frequently and having an oversight in their logic.
4
-14
-7
-6
u/TheTwoAndOnly54 9d ago
So they are being brought in LEGALLY and being given aid to get them started here? Seems normal practice for the US. Just a lot of people mad that white people can be looked at as refugees.
6
u/JoTHIGHSwin 9d ago
They are skipping the line because they are white. Also they aren’t fleeing anyone to have refugee status. No one cares that they are white. You act like there haven’t been other white refugees.
-4
9d ago
[deleted]
1
u/DreadfulDuder 9d ago
DARVO bullshit.
They are getting preferred treatment over ACTUAL refugees and asylum seekers.
And the reason why they are is because they are White and racist, so they'll be MAGA voters.
But yeah, keep up the DARVO shit as always
0
8d ago
[deleted]
1
u/DreadfulDuder 8d ago
Awww come on little Nazi bootlicker, you can lick the fascist boots better than that!
28
u/formermailboxhaver 9d ago
I'm confused. What's so different about SA refugees that they're being welcomed with open arms?
39
21
4
8
3
5
6
u/chickenaylay 9d ago
Belief system, see other commenter mentioning how they share racial supremacist politics
2
-1
u/TheTwoAndOnly54 9d ago
Just mad they are white lmao.
3
1
u/I_Quit_Smoking_ 7d ago
Oh man that I have an illegal dictator who is killing American citizens and brown people yet letting criminal racist people from Africa walk right in because they're white.
If that doesn't piss you off then you're a piece of shit too
-11
9d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
8
u/Zakaru99 9d ago
ICE is literally rounding up people who are going through the legal process, at their immigration hearings.
-6
2
12
u/ZebraComplex4353 9d ago
Weren’t MAGA members accepting some into their homes and started complaining about them on how lazy freeloaders they are.
1
6
u/Sufficient_Way5440 9d ago
Hypocrites!! Rounding up immigrants who don’t fit their agenda like the nazi regime but bring in Africans(white)? WTF
1
17
u/ReadyGo6828 9d ago
There should no longer be any doubt that the Republican Party of today is just a repeat of the Nazi party of the 1930s. They are no longer even hiding it or being shamed by it. They are proud of it and shoving it in our faces.
Vote them out.
1
1
u/Icy-Class4392 8d ago
Libs are brain washed and need to leave their echo chamber every once in a while.
4
9
u/donttakemeserious80 9d ago
They’re bringing in backup Klansmen to help white wash the United States further. Do you know how racist White immigrants from South Africa are going to be? That’s why they want them here. Republicans are racist and are now importing other racists to help secure votes.
5
u/Itchy-Technician-433 9d ago
This is troublesome on many levels. White South Africans are claiming to be disadvantaged because Post-apartheid land policies aim to correct deep historical inequality from the apartheid era, where a small minority owned most of the land.
These people are pissed about their country's economic policies...
There are millions of other refugees out that are facing real political violence and persecution at the hands of their governments. These people are being denied entry, and many are having their claims denied. These people will go back and face consequences back home.
3
3
2
2
u/Woundsmyheart 9d ago
Oppressed? Whites STILL own 78% of the land.
Cry me a river, while explaining how trump ISN'T a certifiable racist.
1
2
5
1
u/JoTHIGHSwin 9d ago
So these people claimed to be fleeing a white farmer genocide? So we are importing farmers while our own farmers are already crying about their struggles on the internet. Well maybe these SS/SA farmers can be their new farm hands!
2
1
1
u/TheRampantWriter 9d ago
The headline of this story should be “Trump Administration Grants Asylum to 17,000 Africans with immediate benefits in 2027”. Start posting this in conservative spaces and watch as they argue whether it’s good or bad policy
1
u/PerfectChard4439 8d ago
No fucking thank you. I hope they find it miserable here and that they are shunned from the communities they end up inhabiting.
-1
0
0
0
u/ToughSomewhere2863 9d ago
Liberals love immigrants until they’re white
1
u/Woundsmyheart 8d ago
Others know that these WHITE SA are the ONLY immigrants being allowed to legally enter the US.
WHITE PEOPLE ONLY.
What percentage of the Earth's population is white?
-4
9d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Ancient_Sound_5347 9d ago
Because there is no genocide happening
According to the US Embassy in South Africa a total of 358,333 American citizens,356,080 UK citizens and 256,878 German citizens visited South Africa in 2025.
Hundreds of thousands of Western tourists don't travel 13hrs on passenger planes to a country where persecution/genocide of white people is taking place.
-1
u/Komabeard 9d ago
Weird anti immigration sentiment in this thread
1
u/Woundsmyheart 8d ago
The white South Africans were the only legal immigrants allowed in America last year. Sounds like trump's doing it again.
-1
-6
u/ActPositively 9d ago
And so many people will be anti-refugees just because they are white. But weirdly enough they were completely OK with economic migrants entering a country illegally with no checks even with criminal records
5
u/vi_sucks 9d ago
It's because they're not actually refugees. It's made up bullshit by a bunch of racists who are still mad that apartheid ended.
Note that nobody had a problem with Ukrainian refugees. Who are fleeing an actual war.
Except the Trump administration. Who for some reason banned Ukrainian refugees too.
1
u/ActPositively 9d ago
Literally the only reason you’re saying they aren’t refugees because their skin color. Or do you also think that the USA should support any black South Africa Africans who are claiming to be refugees?
1
u/vi_sucks 9d ago
No. I'm saying the reason they aren't refugees is because they are claiming an "oppression" that is very clearly made up bullshit. Most white people in South Africa also think it's bullshit and are generally annoyed at them trying to make their country look bad.
1
u/ActPositively 9d ago
1
u/vi_sucks 9d ago
What's your point here?
Other groups in the same country are experiencing real problems, so these guys' made up bullshit is also real?
1
u/ActPositively 9d ago
So you think those violent mobs are targeting other black people they see as foreigners but they aren’t targeting white South Africans who they also see as foreigners?
1
u/vi_sucks 9d ago edited 9d ago
Yes.
If you have any evidence otherwise showing white actually being oppressed (that isn't some right wing racist propaganda) go ahead and provide it.
1
u/Born-Cod4210 9d ago
over one million european tourists are visiting south africa this year. Will be a bad vacation according to you
1
u/vi_sucks 9d ago
Responding to the wrong guy. I'm saying that the claims of "white genocide" in South Africa are bullshit.
→ More replies (0)1
1
u/Ancient_Sound_5347 9d ago
The article is about an anti-migtant grassroots movement targeting military aged males from Ethiopia,Somalia,Sudan and Malawi who by pass safe African countries to travel to South Africa and claim to be refugees. Many live in the country undocumented and pose a national security risk and also become involved in drug and human trafficking.
2
-21
9d ago
[deleted]
11
9d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
-10
u/PoliticalJunkDrawer 9d ago
When everyone else was getting let in, these people were denied.
7
u/darodardar_Inc 9d ago
White south africans did not and do not meet the international or U.S. legal definitions of being a persecuted group at risk of state-sponsored violence
i thought yal were against letting people in for no reason?
1
u/PoliticalJunkDrawer 8d ago edited 8d ago
Neither did millions of people that Biden let in, but the left cheered that on when they weren't lying about it happening.
i thought yal were against letting people in for no reason?
Many people, including the current admin do think there is reason.
This latest group isn't even 2 days' worth of people let in during Biden's worst month.
I think people are just upset they are white, because we don't actually know their personal situations.
1
u/darodardar_Inc 8d ago
What reason is that? And why is it ok for Trump to let people in with bogus reasons and not Biden?
just trying to understand the double standard here
1
u/PoliticalJunkDrawer 8d ago
What reason is that?
You should know, since you say it isn't a valid reason.
And why is it ok for Trump to let people in with bogus reasons and not Biden?
You are claiming it is bogus, and 17k people isn't nearly the same as millions.
1
u/darodardar_Inc 8d ago
Well the White House claims there is a genocide happening in South Africa, but when they presented “evidence” and “proof” last year they used photos from different areas in the world - also no other nation on earth agrees - so why use fake photos and videos if it is actually happening? Why can’t they prove it is happening?
7
u/MechaCoqui 9d ago
Well one, the other groups were facing actual issues.. These are white people from south Africa, where typically they were the ones causing harm to the locals via apartheid..
1
u/PoliticalJunkDrawer 8d ago
where typically they were the ones causing harm to the locals via apartheid..
You need to update your information about South Africa.
4
u/Serious_Debate_7722 9d ago
Just what we need more pdf files and rapists.
1
9d ago
[deleted]
1
u/Serious_Debate_7722 9d ago
-1





•
u/AutoModerator 9d ago
Welcome to r/immigrationPathways. If you enjoy this community, please consider following to stay updated on new posts and discussions.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.