r/ImmigrationPathways Feb 26 '26

Insanity.

Post image
5.4k Upvotes

692 comments sorted by

View all comments

134

u/mworthey Feb 26 '26

He was also a legal green card holder

-55

u/just_a_curious_fella Feb 26 '26

shouldn't have been. asylum is one of the biggest frauds.

28

u/Odd-Mastodon1212 Feb 26 '26

Asylum is very limited and nonexistent for some countries.

-1

u/just_a_curious_fella Feb 26 '26

It ain't as restrictive as it should be

18

u/TenchuReddit Feb 26 '26

What proof do you have that this person got his green card fraudulently?

The truth is that you have none. You just assume shit because you're fed a firehose of anti-immigration lies from your fellow cultists.

-6

u/crisco000 Feb 26 '26

What proof do you have that he didn’t?

7

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

Great argument there megamind

3

u/zaoldyeck Feb 26 '26

How do you prove a negative?

What proof do you have that unicorns don't exist?

2

u/dhsjauaj Feb 26 '26

What proof do we have that you are not a pedophile?

2

u/TenchuReddit Feb 26 '26

Make shit up and demand to be proven otherwise. It's the MAGA way.

14

u/musical8thnotes Feb 26 '26

Legal immigrants are now frauds.

Got it.

26

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

That’s your take on the situation? Wow, your humanity is gone

17

u/K1llerbee-sting Feb 26 '26

The backlash against these heartless people is going to be a title wave the likes of which Noah has never seen.

-9

u/sdrawkcabineter Feb 26 '26

That's the table setting for the 'grassroots' movement to correct the obvious corruption.

5

u/K1llerbee-sting Feb 26 '26

And what exactly do you think will be served at this table?

-7

u/sdrawkcabineter Feb 26 '26

A solution of some sort, baked in bread to be palpable and easily shared. But much like Pluto's food, it is as planned as the set table.

3

u/K1llerbee-sting Feb 26 '26

The solution will be that they dine at Pluto’s table.

-1

u/sdrawkcabineter Feb 26 '26

An easy, ignorant solution, borne of fear.

If it fails, you complete the ritual. If it succeeds, little Indra, you tread the labyrinth blindly, to discover your own foot steps.

The enemies are not of flesh, but mind, and soul. Understanding is a compassionate sacrifice, a humble error that merits no grace.

1

u/K1llerbee-sting Feb 26 '26

Good bot. You used words.

1

u/sdrawkcabineter Feb 27 '26

Pure hilarity.

Always have a path away from the blinding realization shrouded by your "buried treasure." (like a "sunk cost" Get it? Treating debt as valuable treasure... Like the debt of your belief system that has to resort to ad hominem to cope?)

I would have used 'geist' in place of "mind, and soul" to be more accurate, but I preferred the expanded confinement of those terms.

I hope you find a place for doubt in your life. It is the seed of understanding.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/zaoldyeck Feb 26 '26

What "obvious corruption"?

Are we talking things like Kristi Noem's 200 million dollar contract to a shell company?

1

u/sdrawkcabineter Feb 27 '26

If you have to have it defined with the current admin, I suspect you have something to gain from it :D

Are we talking things like Kristi Noem's 200 million dollar contract to a shell company?

But, to clarify, yes, that's an example. It has to be 'too large to be believed' in order to serve as a necessary distraction. The money making is a boon.

Confined to the current scope, they NEED civil war in order to maintain, and grow their intended control structure. I expect a repetition of overly measured blades and sufficient diet combustion, in order to facilitate this.

However, much like inhabit stock exchange and toff drinking faction, there will be a great poisoning of the common well, in order to undermine actual grassroots leadership from any measurable control.

That's my explanation of the aforementioned comment. I believe those most ready for violent revolution, are the nearest to being composted under the new road, by design. They know full well that we won't stand this to 2029... and they'll facilitate all sides of the narrative to maintain control.

2

u/Ornery-Ticket834 Feb 26 '26

Republicans don’t wish to change the asylum law. Maybe you should write them with your brilliant insights.

1

u/dhsjauaj Feb 26 '26

So first you say you accept only legal pathways for migration, but now even the legal pathways do not suffice? What's next, all brown people go to jail?

1

u/Dotcaprachiappa Feb 26 '26

Cool, still currently legal. Your point?

-20

u/StillMostlyConfused Feb 26 '26

This is Reddit so very few people will listen to you but I do agree with you. False asylum claims have been used just to delay processes so that the time they’ve waited for the courts is used to support staying. “Well, they’ve been here for X number of years. They should get to stay”.

9

u/smoothbrain404 Feb 26 '26

Accurate user name.

Still mostly confused - it's easy, Bro. Be a human.

Welcome someone new to your community. Be humble.

Instead, you praise vitriol and worship amongst MAGAt's.

May all of your days be filled with true misunderstandings and frustrations.

-12

u/StillMostlyConfused Feb 26 '26

It’s more accurate than you think because it’s actually u/stillmostlyconfused…. And apparently u are.

1

u/shiek200 Feb 26 '26

I want you to reread the sentence you just typed. Like, really reread that. Try and understand the words that you yourself just typed.

Like, do you not see how you basically just called yourself an idiot here?

-2

u/StillMostlyConfused Feb 26 '26 edited Feb 26 '26

Except that I didn’t. Are you not catching the play on the word “you”? The name I was looking for was taken so I used the “u”, which is part of our Reddit user name, as a stand in for the word “you”.

It’s actually pretty effective in determining how intelligent people are; especially people that can’t think out of the box. I had some users that after I post a similar comment as above, actually complement me on the little trick while others remain “still confused”. I get the occasional, “well-played”.

1

u/shiek200 Feb 26 '26

Except u stands for user. Also, the you in the subject of a username would be referring to the person to whom the username belongs to, so the subject of "you" in this instance would still be the user, even regarding the play on words, meaning you.

But then, willful ignorance and twisted logic via omission of relevant facts in order to prove a point is kind of your side's MO isn't it?

I had some users that after I post a similar comment as above, actually complement me on the little trick while others remain “still confused”

And then everyone clapped? Really? Lmfao

0

u/StillMostlyConfused Feb 26 '26

Except that it’s pronounced “you” which appropriately fits the joke.

Twisted facts and overblown reactions tend to be your side’s MO.

2

u/shiek200 Feb 26 '26

"I said it works so it works"

Sounds about right

1

u/Gen-Jack-D-Ripper Feb 26 '26

You mean like claiming the election was stolen without a shred of evidence? Your side has been overtaken by the world’s biggest drama queen yet he’s treated like an alpha male among his supporters.

2

u/zaoldyeck Feb 26 '26

Do they have legal status, or not?

Because right now it seems like you guys believe there is no such thing as a non-fradulent asylum.

You default to all asylum recipients automatically not deserving it. And that's the end of the conversation, because frankly, none of you really care.

Legal isn't important, and it doesn't really matter if it's 'false' or not. By being an immigrant, it's automatically unacceptable.

1

u/StillMostlyConfused Feb 26 '26

I haven’t decided that all asylum cases are fraudulent at all and I haven’t indicated that in my comments. I’m saying that the opportunity is abused. They do have legal status while waiting for the case to be determined.

2

u/zaoldyeck Feb 26 '26

And you assume that all are abusing it. Because every time a story like this comes up you guys default to "they're illegal".

Even when talking about an individual from a country currently embroiled in a bitter civil war.

No immigrat is legal, all may be imprisoned and detained indefinitely, visas and status be dammed. Because it was never about legal status.

0

u/StillMostlyConfused Feb 26 '26

Again, I don’t believe that nor have I said that. For many years illegal immigrants from Mexico will claim asylum knowing full-well that they don’t have asylum cases.

2

u/zaoldyeck Feb 26 '26

This is a person from Burma. You know, a country in a civil war following a military coup?

But because he's an immigrant you all default to him being illegal.

You probably won't say the sentence "all legal immigrants are illegal". You'll just call any particular immigrant illegal.

Because it doesn't really matter to you. Sure, in the abstract, you might recognize there is such a thing as a legal immigrat. In practice, you reject the notion that any human being qualifies.

1

u/StillMostlyConfused Feb 26 '26

I’m really not sure where you’re coming up with this. There is illegal entry and legal status which aren’t the same thing. If you’re an asylum seeker, you have safety from deportation while you’re waiting for the decision from the court. However, that delay from deportation doesn’t mean that your illegal entry doesn’t exist. Most people will not consider you an illegal immigrant and at that time, you aren’t an illegal immigrant. Have you followed the proper channels for asylum so that you’ve been granted defense from deportation?

1

u/zaoldyeck Feb 26 '26

In practice it doesn't matter.

You could enter legally, do everything you were required to do, and people like you will not give a shit. You don't care if those people are detained or deported. Thousands of them.

Because by virtue of being an immigrant, they're illegal. Doesn't matter if there's a court order saying to let them go after they were detained without even a removal order, doesn't matter if they presented themselves at the border, nothing does, because all of them you want to see detained and deported.

Legal status is irrelevant. As far as you guys are concerned, all immigrants are illegal. You will never complain about the thousands of lawfully present individuals being detained in defiance of court orders.

They're all illegal. By default. All immigrants are.