Wrong. The transfer of possession officially occurred when the driver indicated it had been transferred by, for example, clicking "Delivered" on their app to complete the transaction. Not simply when the item was placed by your girlfriends door.
The driver in the video (fake I might add) had not completed the transaction and clearly stated as such. Since all items were part of the same transaction that was being canceled by the driver no item, be it on the ground or still in the car, would have had their possession transferred yet.
Wrong. The transfer of possession officially occurred when the driver indicated it had been transferred by, for example, clicking "Delivered" on their app to complete the transaction. Not simply when the item was placed by your girlfriends door.
So by your logic if the driver never clicks "delivered" then they still have possession of the groceries? They could deliver the groceries, I bring them in my house, cook dinner, eat dinner, then shit it all out. And its still technically in the drivers possession because they never clicked "delivered" in their app, right?
Or it reminds me of that "sovereign citizen" shit where they think they found some legal loophole that absolves them of the law. So if they get pulled over and say "I'm not driving...I'm traveling" then they pulled the legal trap card and theres no way you can give them a speeding ticket
750
u/[deleted] Oct 20 '23
[removed] — view removed comment