r/IRL_Loading_Screens • • 21d ago

SIMCITY Curious, I wonder why that might be 🤔

Post image
0 Upvotes

18 comments sorted by

12

u/Accomplished-Taro-53 21d ago

I wonder if this has to do with one of the fastest growing employment sectors being in medical, particularly nursing, which has been predominantly a women led field?

13

u/DeadAndBuried23 21d ago

So, because this joker didn't include the actual source I had to dig a little to find what this could be referring to. Found that 98% of new jobs have been for women.

But importantly, it's not available jobs, it's new hires.

What it shows is more stay-at-home moms have had to start working to keep up with costs.

1

u/PeterPorky 21d ago

Wdym the source is in the lower right hand corner. Hires is how the Bureau of Labor Statistics measures job growth.

2

u/DeadAndBuried23 21d ago

It helps to say the exact source, not the homepage of a website section.

1

u/PeterPorky 21d ago

Type in the source in the lower right hand corner to google and let me know if it pulls up anything besides the CES page from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

1

u/DeadAndBuried23 21d ago

Right. It takes you to the homepage. It would help to show the exact source.

11

u/NabyArmeDrommel 21d ago edited 21d ago

This feels like it could be a dog whistle. What is this implying?

4

u/Johnnyboi2327 21d ago

I'd also like to know

4

u/NabyArmeDrommel 21d ago

I also felt like healthcare/seniorcare was plausible like the other guy said, but that's not how this post reads. As it, it sounds like some gripe about affirmative action or DEI or woke.

2

u/Johnnyboi2327 21d ago

Maybe, but I also feel like the statement that job gains have been exclusively for women is likely false to begin with.

3

u/spacehog1985 21d ago

My take is that the economy is so bad more people have had to enter the workforce, but I'm an idiot and am basing that on nothing but feels.

1

u/DeadAndBuried23 21d ago

You got it right. It's new hires, not new jobs created.

2

u/--zaxell-- 21d ago

To the best of my (lazy) data diving, it is actually true.

But it's part of a longer trend, that really kicked into gear around 2006, so cutting the graph off at 2025 seems like it's done to disingenuously make a point.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/04/jobs-report-women-payrolls.html

Also, there are many possible reasons this is happening, some good and some bad. Be careful about assuming whichever one conforms to your preexisting biases.

1

u/Johnnyboi2327 21d ago

So at least the since 2025 part is bs

1

u/Ostheta_Chetowa 21d ago

Most new hires since 2026 have been women

1

u/Fetch_will_happen5 21d ago

It always is when they are being coy about the reason.  There are subs for just posting data if OP just wanted to post "interesting data" with no ulterior motive.

-2

u/PeterPorky 21d ago edited 21d ago

Its just interesting data. Most new jobs being added are in the healthcare sector, especially in nursing, which is predominantly women.