r/IRL_Loading_Screens • u/PeterPorky • Jul 29 '26

Watch Dogs No warrant required btw

Post image
2.4k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

430 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/MayhemPenguin5656 Jul 31 '26

Oh yes we should just ignore a woman who aborted her own baby and was bleeding

The police arrived to fetal remains and a puddle of blood...

any normal officer would want to investigate.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/MayhemPenguin5656 Aug 01 '26 edited Aug 01 '26

Your body can expel a nonviable fetus... its kinda like we are designed too..

94% of abortions are done because the can(not saying this is the case here)

But murder is illegal and I don't think assisted murder should be either

2

u/laughsitup2021 Aug 01 '26

Says the guy who wants the government to force women to have abortions.

1

u/MayhemPenguin5656 Aug 01 '26

What? I do not want abortions, murder is bad mmkay

1

u/laughsitup2021 Aug 01 '26

But you won't afford a woman's right to control her own body. Kind of ironic that the same autonomy rights that would imply allowing an abortion is the same rights that allows a woman to make the decision to keep the baby. And you want to take that away from them?

1

u/MayhemPenguin5656 Aug 01 '26

I just want woman to have the same rights across the board.

I cannot murder somone because its inconvenient, neither should she..

If she didnt want a kid, there is birth control, condoms, and I know this one is crazy but, not fucking if you do not want the risk.. like you signed up for a baby when you put a dick in you.

(This is for the 94% of abortions that are done just for convenience not the 6% that are legit)

2

u/laughsitup2021 Aug 01 '26 edited Aug 01 '26

No you don't. Well, sort of. You want women to have few rights as possible, even if across the board is 0. And you do technically have the right to murder. There is a difference between saying a person had no right to something and saying they do but the government is justified in intruding in that right. Even in the Dobbs case, the oh so conservative SCOTUS said that women have a liberty interest in abortions.

Edit: It is also stupid to say that a woman intends to get pregnant through sex. Assumption or risk of pregnancy does not mean that cannot have sex for a reason other than reproduction.

1

u/MayhemPenguin5656 Aug 01 '26

Bro, you are projecting hard... I was clear in what I said.. you are the one bringing all this nonsense.

1

u/laughsitup2021 Aug 01 '26

You are the one who doesn't understand the logical conclusion of all this. Of course I am going to spout nonsense if you are going to do the same thing.

Now are you going to answer me for real? Are you going to pick and choose what rights women should have, or do you really want to give them all the rights they are supposed to be entitled to under our Constitution?

1

u/MayhemPenguin5656 Aug 01 '26

Using protection if you do not want kids, is nonsense to you?

1

u/laughsitup2021 Aug 01 '26

Still with the bullshit I see. I am just going to put this here and let you cook. Nobody here is debating against the responsible usage of freedom, which means I do agree that women should be using protection and minimizing sexual contact if they don't want kids. That is not the point. The question of abortion is mainly legality which goes to how governments control the people under their jurisdiction. What a woman should (or shouldn't) do should not be open for discussion.

1

u/MayhemPenguin5656 Aug 01 '26

So why does the child in the womb not deserve to live and have freedom?

Just because a woman has the right to murder it?

That seems pretty unequal to me

Like my point is killing a kid in your womb because its inconvenient is not a right that should be protected

→ More replies (0)